Lieberman: 'Impossible To Me' on Health Care

[tomm2thumbs]

Run time: 00:56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvnpH24Rb8c   Posted on YouTube: July 20, 2009 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: July 20, 2009 By DU Member: tomm2thumbs Views on DU: 908

 

Joe Lieberman has health care, but he obviously doesn't want anyone else to get it.

Can we tell this turncoat wannabe-Republican that he is no longer welcome to caucus with the Democrats. Can someone please tell me the reason he wasn't stripped of all his leadership positions because I'd love to hear it. Anyone?

[tomm2thumbs]

1. With friends like these... /nt

[billyoc]

2. Getting rid of him seems impossible to me.

:evilgrin:

[Manifestor_of_Light]

3. He missed his calling.

He would do a splendid job as a

LAWN GNOME. :rofl:

[tomm2thumbs]

4. he too depressing to make grass grow

and I wouldn't put him on the lawn either in case dogs find it an appropriate target - but this makes sense

[sasquuatch55]

5. Get busy reading it Droopy Dog!

nt

[lame54]

7. He is busy trying to remember which month comes first.

October or September. He says it would be better to come back in September to work on health care after talking to his constituents in October.

[Hulk]

6. That'll give us time to talk it over with our constituents....and lie like dogs!

We'll have a couple months to blitz the ignorant American public about how "socialism is coming to steal their children" and "big government will watch you die on the side of the curb".

Such absolute BULL SHIT!! I see President Obama's reasoning for getting this done BEFORE the break. The repug/rightwing/lobby interests will do everything in their power to lie, cheat and steal this away from Congress.

THESE are the scumbags that need to be taken out and horse whipped!

[mascarax]

8. I can't answer your question

At least, to my own satisfaction. I think his cushy leadership positions should've been taken away.

And, if you write him (non-CT citizen), you get the "I only read CT emails" or something to that effect. Not even "I'll only *answer* CT emails" - his office's auto-email is "read"! Ass. But I'm SURE he'll use that info to solicit donations! In which case, we're ready with our "Sorry, Joe, we only read solicitations from our state. Except where your primary opponent is concerned - in which case, we donate to him/her!"

[snake in the grass]

9. What the fuck is he talking about?

Talk with the constituents in October, then continue the debate in September? When, 2010? We've waited long enough. It's time these turds started earning their money and with that I mean their salaries, not the money they have blown up their fine-powdered asses from the lobbyists.

[stlsaxman]

10. WTF? Do we NEED 60 votes? That's for a veto-proof bill, right?

do they really think Obama's gonna veto this?