democracy1st
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-25-09 02:05 AM
Original message |
Franken reads 4th Amendment to Justice Department official |
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-25-09 03:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Al Franken is one funny guy. |
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-25-09 03:24 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Franken's radio show used really brighten my day at work. He used to tear Rush and OLielly apart nt |
tclambert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-25-09 06:17 AM
Response to Original message |
3. That was funny, and a good question, but I think David Kriss answered it ably |
|
and sensibly. The Patriot Act is a little loose on how you identify targets for "roving wiretaps," but the 4th Amendment allows a little looseness because it doesn't require naming names, just "particularly describing" the target of the warrant. A constitutional challenge could lead to a silly argument about the definition of "particularly." Probably not the most promising pursuit for the ACLU.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |