Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Admin To Remove Endangered Species Protection From Gray Wolves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:07 PM
Original message
Obama Admin To Remove Endangered Species Protection From Gray Wolves
 
Run time: 03:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqMg3uWGEFI
 
Posted on YouTube: December 07, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: December 07, 2009
By DU Member: democracy1st
Views on DU: 1137
 
Salazar Approves Removing Gray Wolves From Endangered Species List

In a move that is certain to rile environmental activists, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar today upheld a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remove gray wolves from the list of threatened and endangered species. The Endangered Species Act currently protects wolves living in the western Great Lakes and the northern Rocky Mountain states of Idaho and Montana as well as parts of Washington, Oregon and Utah.

“The recovery of the gray wolf throughout significant portions of its historic range is one of the great success stories of the Endangered Species Act,” Salazar said in a statement. “When it was listed as endangered in 1974, the wolf had almost disappeared from the continental United States. Today, we have more than 5,500 wolves, including more than 1,600 in the Rockies.”

Much of that success is attributable to the reintroduction of wolf populations into Yellowstone National Park in the 1990s. Wolves were transplanted to the Rocky Mountain region from Canada as a check on burgeoning populations of elk and bison. As a result, wolf populations in the park have ballooned from 30-40 wolves to the 1,600 that Salazar cited in his announcement.

When plans to remove gray wolves from the endangered species list were initially broached in February 2008, environmental and animal-rights groups filed suit to keep the wolves on the endangered list. A federal court judge in Montana sided last year with the groups and determined that the animal's survival was at risk. In particular, the judge cited Wyoming as a state that did not have adequate provisions in place to ensure the animal's long-term survival after it is de-listed. In deference to this, the department will not remove Wyoming gray wolves from the endangered species list.

Environmental groups expressed disappointment and some seemed poised to mount additional legal challenges to the department's decision today.

“We are disappointed the new administration has missed this opportunity to change course, and rethink the failed wolf persecution policies of the last eight years,” said Jonathan Lovvorn, vice president & chief counsel for animal protection litigation with The Humane Society of the United States. “We urge the Department of the Interior to reconsider this ongoing effort to strip wolves of all federal protection, which has been repeatedly struck down by the courts, and is no more likely to succeed here than the previous failed attempts.”

The Fish and Wildlife Service announced a revised plan to remove the wolves from the list in January, but Salazar put it on hold as part of an overall regulatory review of Bush-era policies by the Obama administration.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/06/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4849589.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sucko. Pandering to the 'guns first' crowd.
No creature should ever be removed from that list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So you are in favor of uncontrolled predation by wolves?
Just sayin, that is not the intent of the endangered species act, please study the science and thoughtfulness that went into that legislation, and stop arguing from a position of an uninformed free predation advocate.

Nature has a balance in mind, not a plan to allow for wolves to overpopulate, and over-run all other species in a given area. That's the intent of the endangered species act, to restore something close to the balance of nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wolves help keep the deer in check.
The deer are always a problem, mainly because tend to think of predators as bad. Never mind we humans are the worse predators because we always take the biggest and best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Salazar is one of the president's mistakes - this is disgusting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It is indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is wrong and stupid ....
we have enough species of animals in peril without adding the gray wolves who have only just begun to regain their numbers. Besides most wolves have more ethical and kinder social groups than most politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually Salazar is following commonly accepted protocols as to
what constitutes "endangered species", within the endangered species act, under which he must work.

To tell us that he is not to follow the law, well, that's not what I would support.

Of course there must be continued protections for the increase of any species, but growing from 50 to 1600 in one US area in less than 20 years bodes well for the wolf population. Then there is the issue of genetic diversity, freedom of range, and several other factors to ensure success of the species. I don't want wolves over-running my back yard, but I am glad they are sufficient in numbers that they will not become endangered anytime soon in the US. That is the intent of the endangered species act.

If some have a problem with the intentions of that legislation, take it up with a Democratic Congress under Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanwy Donating Member (461 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Eggsellent points Robo50
I see no issues with pulling wolves from the protection of the endangered species act, as long as states have solid plans to maintain the populations at current or higher levels. They have recovered and I have had the privileged of seeing and hearing them in the wild. Now its time to manage them and the big game populations so they all maintain survivable levels with the current habitat available to them, and not let the ranchers convince us they don't get fair compensation for their losses, they do.

Its pretty funny Wyoming was left off the list. We have allowed the ranching lobby in the state to delay, denounce and otherwise wreak havoc on state officials trying to come up with a workable plan. I hate to say it, but was a slap in the face of the powers that be in our State. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creationismsucks Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I actually thought it said "gay wolves"

...and that it was an Onion post.

Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I am in favor of gay wolves having the right to marry, even in red states like
Wyoming.

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. And let's not forget the most important cause.


This is an issue I totally support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. NOooo!
very disappointing . x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, suck up to the beef industry who already kills buffalo on PUBLIC
lands to increase their profits. Wipe out an endangered species so that they might keep two or three more calves for the slaughter. Great.

Nail in the coffin Obama. I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC