Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow: OH THE HYPOCRISY!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:10 AM
Original message
Rachel Maddow: OH THE HYPOCRISY!
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 02:08 AM by democracy1st
 
Run time: 10:59
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1vIbVIHync
 
Posted on YouTube: December 30, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: December 30, 2009
By DU Member: democracy1st
Views on DU: 3225
 
http://MOXNews.com/
December 29, 2009 MSNBC Rachel Maddow

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/


Rachel breaks down the hypocrisy coming from republicans over national security measures. This is a Must See video,thanks Rachel.



Bush Waited Six Days To Discuss Shoe Bomber With No GOP Complaints



The bellowing by Republicans over the Obama administration's supposedly lackadaisical response to the attempted bombing of an airliner over Detroit seems as much about political posturing as legitimate national security concerns.

How else to explain the GOP's relatively quiet reaction eight years ago to President George W. Bush's detached response after a similarly-botched terrorist attack?

On December 22, 2001, Richard Reid -- known more infamously as the shoe bomber -- failed in his attempt to blow up a Miami-bound jet using explosives hidden in his shoe. Coming less than four months after September 11, there already were deep concerns about a potential attack during the upcoming holiday break. Nevertheless, President Bush did not directly address the foiled plot for six days, according to an extensive review of newspaper records from that time period. And when he did, it was only in passing.

The day of the attempted attack, for example, the Associated Press reported that "White House officials" were monitoring the situation throughout the afternoon and that "President Bush received two briefings" on the matter while at Camp David for the holidays. Spokesman Scott McClellan, meanwhile, told reporters that administration officials were consulting with acting Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift -- the plane Reid boarded made an emergency landing at Boston's Logan International Airport.

"The White House has been monitoring the situation since early on today," McClellan said, according to a Washington Post article published on December 23. The lead statement came from Swift, who lauded the "heroic acts" of "the flight attendants and passengers who helped subdue the suspect."



Little changed in the days ahead. The Washington Post, citing administration sources, also reported on Sunday December 23 that Bush would seek an increase in domestic security funds as the centerpiece of his 2003 budget request. On Monday December 24, CNN reported that Bush called members of the U.S. military stationed overseas to pass along holiday wishes. He was joined at Camp David that day by "the extended Bush clan... including the President's parents, the former President and the First Lady."

That same day, The New York Post quoted Thomas Kinton, interim executive director of the Massachusetts Port Authority, discussing how Reid was ultimately subdued. In addition, U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), was quoted saying: "The message here... is that terrorists are going to hit us again." The final edition of USA Today that day reported that: "A White House spokesman said President Bush was monitoring the incident." As for an on-the-record comment, The Boston Globe noted that: "Bush has not issued any statements about the incident."




By Wednesday, December 26, Bush had left Camp David and was en route via Air Force One to his ranch in Crawford, Texas, according to ABC News. While there, another equally pressing national security concern entered his radar: Osama bin Laden released another videotape. On the scene in Crawford, then CNN correspondent Major Garrett was asked whether the administration had any reaction.

"No, Wolf," he said to host Wolf Blitzer. "The White House is really a bit hamstrung in this regard. First of all, it didn't expect the tape to be released. Second of all, many senior advisers are not here with the president at the Crawford ranch. Many of them are taking what the president considers to be a well-deserved vacation. And they're scattered around the country. They're trying to get in touch with each other."

By the end of the day, a response was issued -- but from a deputy press secretary and not the president himself. "The Bush administration says Osama bin Laden's latest statements are -- quote -- "terrorist propaganda,'" relayed Blitzer.

"That itself is a story, Wolf," Major Garrett remarked. "Because the White House really feels that now if it responded in any more formal way, any more lengthy way, it would be he elevating bin Laden in a way that's simply not in the United States's or its coalition partners' overall interest."

The real kicker came the next day -- Thursday December 27. CNN led off its report by noting that the president "decided to keep quiet" about "the latest bin Laden tape" in what was a "quiet day at the Western White House." Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, however, held a press conference in which he announced -- to the amazement of some observers -- that he'd "stopped chasing" reports on the terrorist leader.

In that press conference, Rumsfeld was also asked about Richard Reid -- now five days after the incident. "That's a matter that's in the hands of the law enforcement people and not the Department of Defense," he said. "And I don't have anything I would want to add."

It would be another day before Bush himself publicly mentioned the shoe bomber. In a press conference on December 28, in Crawford, the president said that incident was proof that "the country has been on alert."

"A stewardess on an American Airlines flight - or a flight attendant on an American Airlines flight - was vigilant, saw something amiss and responded," he added. "It's an indication that the culture of America has shifted to one of alertness, and I'm grateful for the flight attendant's response, as I'm sure the passengers on that airplane."

And so there you have it. The Bush White House downplayed not just the Reid incident (handing over lead responsibilities to federal law enforcement officials) but also consciously deflected attention away from bin Laden out of concern about elevating his latest antics.

In contrast to that response, the current White House has been quite active. The attempted bombing of the plane over Detroit occurred on December 25. That night, Obama convened a secure conference call with his Homeland Security and counter-terrorism advisers. He did the same the next morning and the morning after that. On the 27th, the president dispatched his press secretary, Robert Gibbs, and the head of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, to the Sunday shows to take questions on the matter. And on December 28, he gave a public statement while still on site in Hawaii.

Obama may not have worn a tie while giving those remarks (which has annoyed more than a few conservatives). But he did host a public address specifically on the situation (which Bush did not do). And while Napolitano may have gaffed during the first round of interviews by proclaiming that the system worked, it was nothing worse than what then-Attorney General John Ashcroft said about Richard Reid back in 2001.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/29/bush-waited-nine-days-to_n_406307.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck the GOP in the ass with a broken glass dildo - two times
If Barack Obama was hiding in the bathroom on this flight and he SPRUNG from his perch at exactly the PRECISE correct moment and pulled a Jack Bauer on this guys ass and dragged him to the front of the plane while handing a freshly baked chocolate chip cookie to a three year old cute little white girl in the second row the right wing would complain that the freshly baked chocolate chip cookie was not a freshly baked TOLL HOUSE chocolate chip cookie and therefore Barack Obama was a Muslin anti-american godless commie and should be impeached.

That's how they roll.

But, that's like my opinion man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raoul Donating Member (666 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I disagree
Nope, that is not 'just your opinion' as you put it. That is the 'absolute f-ing truth'.. Good job! The bastards complain about everything no matter what.

But I did notice that the flag pin on Obama's lapel is a little smaller than the one bush wore.. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. What Janet Napolitano should have said is
"If Republicans hadn't been sitting on the TSA chief's nomination, and If Funding wasn't constantly cut during the Bushie administration we wouldn't be having so much trouble with security"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm glad Rachel showed so much of Uncle Pat's bullshit.
Uncle Pat has never respected Rachel. Fuck Uncle Pat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Uncle Pat
.....is a failed far-right politico who spouted almost fascist bullshit during his time in politics in the 1990s. I wouldn't respect the fool if he was the last man on Earth.

Rachel, by contrast, is the shit. :D Her and Keith and Ed keep making life miserable for the Republicans, and may God smile on 'em for doing so. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. What sadistic idiots these Republicans are.
Didn't they take any psychology at all in college? The stupidest thing to do with this underpants bomber would be to torture him. You do a psychological profile on the guy, study his personality. If he knows anything, you will find it out. Torture is not necessary and would be the wrong approach especially with this would-be terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do they think he should use the Bush tactics for addressing
the country after a tragedy/terrorist attack/anything else that comes as a shock?
He pretty much only had two.
"Huh? What the fuck just happened?" and "Jesus Christ! We're all going to die!"
Which one do Republicans feel is appropriate to the situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rachel really nailed them to their own idiocy - the old admin reps are a joke

thanks for posting - I missed the show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. What worthless hypocrites republicans are!
The mindless idiocy from the right is simply endless. The constant lies! The horrible, explicitly un-American attitude! It's unbelievable. We Americans should rise up and protest this awful behavior by conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I agree !!! I'm sick and tired of them all, and want them to be
made accountable, questioned by competent interviewers!

The media sucks in not doing what Rachel does so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm glad Racheal put
them on blast. But we all know that this was the republicans and their pundits time to have a field day on the underwear bomber. They have used this as an opportunity to raise money for their election campaigns(DeMint and Hoekstra).And DeMint has a lot of nerves he is the one holding up the confirmation of the head of the TSA,and his reason for doing so is because he feels that the new head will let the baggage handlers form a union. Then he grandstands all over network television saying the President needs to improve security.All this is a ploy to take our eyes off the fact that they are holding up progress. Hey trolls,we see you. And we got something for your ass in 2010. Let us let you in on something, we know you are corrupt,no good,full of s--t,crawl on your belly,stench of the earth,and all around f--ked up.We will not let you stay in power we are coming to get our country back for our children and their children you rotten cons.Yes we will ,yes we can.:* :* :*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganDemocrat Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. You go girl!
Keep telling the truth, Rachael. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W T F Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Can we stop ignoring the 800 lb gorilla in the room?
The GOP's position:

It's OK when a WHITE president does it, but it's not OK when a Black president does it.

There! I said it. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC