Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Olbermann: 'The House of Secrets' (w/ John Dean)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 04:55 AM
Original message
Olbermann: 'The House of Secrets' (w/ John Dean)
 
Run time: 08:33
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvYKeImzC5c
 
Posted on YouTube: July 28, 2007
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: July 28, 2007
By DU Member: Hissyspit
Views on DU: 1786
 
Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann - JULY 27, 2007. Gonzales, Comey, Tony Snow, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting clip, thanks. WRT John Dean's point that Nixon was sensitive to ridicule
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 07:00 AM by DemItAllAnyway
and that's what drove him from office, and that Bush is different b/c he doesn't get it—I wonder did he mean that Bush is blissfully unaware that he is a ridiculous figure (he just doesn't 'get it'), or that he is actually not receiving any ridicule, not getting it in any appreciable measure from the media? Hmmm. Because I have always believed that he is vulnerable to being told "shame on you," ever since he famously mangled an ordinary cliche because he just couldn't say "(Fool me twice,) shame on ME."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope. It's the psychopathy...
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 09:29 AM by truth2power
"...and that Bush is different b/c he doesn't get it..."

You know how Bush has been described as "incurious," and how that seems so odd? Would "indifferent" be an equally accurate term?

You know how he smirks and shrugs and has that creepy chuckle when describing events that, to us, are extremely distressing? For instance, the hideous injuries inflicted on our troops in Iraq? Do you feel there's something "off" about that, but you can't adequately describe it?

How about when he states (and he has) that he sleeps well at night, or when he said, shortly after 9/11, "All in all it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me?"

Well, take a look at this:

"While most of us have strong inhibitions about physically injuring others, psychopaths typically do not. For them, violence and threats are handy tools to be used when they are angered, defied, or frustrated, and they give little thought to the pain and humiliation experienced by the victims. Their violence is callous and instrumental --used to satisfy a simple need, such as sex, or to obtain something he or she wants -- and the psychopath's reactions to the event are much more likely to be indifference , a sense of power, pleasure, or smug satisfaction than regret over the damage done. Certainly nothing to lose any sleep over.

-- Robert D. Hare, PhD, Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us p. 88-89


Textbook case.



> > >

edit: Yikes! Wrong book title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You said it!
Spot - on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Gonzolies (verb. nov.) English, May 17, 2007
When Boston Globe reporter Bill Cardoso read Hunter Thompson's "The Kentucky Derby is Decadent and Depraved" he proclaimed "That is pure Gonzo!" Cardoso used the South Boston Irish slang describing the last man standing after a drinking marathon.

"Gonzolies" is the English neologism describing the last man standing after a lying match.

"Gonzo journalism" refers to when an author cannot remove himself from the subject he investigates, often referring to a style of writing a story as perceived in the moment in the mind of the writer. Thompson believed objectivity in journalism was pure myth.

MORE: Gonzolies (verb. nov.) English, May 17, 2007
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x907626
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good Point: Parse-lies do not count as chargable crimes.
If we can prove that any one "I do not recall" is a lie, we are in the perjury business.

If you just analyze Gonzolies attorney-speak, it simply says, "I'm working around an obvious lie I cannot tell, so I'll parse a string of bull crap together for you that will make you think I answered your question the way I would if I told a direct lie that would sound a lot like what this seems to say."

Parse-lie, definition: a "parse-lie" is a political plant that blooms all year long. A parse-lie is not a real lie, it is just a florid string of crap that makes one believe something not said. It is a clever construction that makes one believe the lie it replaces. At the same time, it end runs the actual lie by parsing truth to sound like the lie it averts.

Gonzolies is still the number one cop.
Parse-lies really stink like the BS they are.

You need more than "I do not recall" to prosecute someone for perjury.
Gonzolies has been parse-lying like a professional attorney!
Nonetheless, this has all the odor of a lying contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "cannot" seems an odd choice of words in the phrase, "when an author cannot remove himself...",
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 03:41 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
when HST's technique was deliberate, because he considered that no-one could report on US politics objectively. And he was surely right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabies1 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. I love listening to John Dean.
This man has great insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Impeachment is too good for these shameless thugs

Bush and Cheney deserve nothing less than the death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. We all miss what my old friend Mr Dean alluded to: the truth, IS worse... or rather
the hair splitting of the truth is worse. Maybe they were talking about the patriot act + data mining(right from the phone lines, every name, every piece of data) + a little known Vegas created computer program which all add together to make one BIG nasty open ended "may I peek into every one's life surveillance program PLUS. What is the plus? Not only does it violate your right to freedom from unlawful search and seizure, but also your right to free association. You see the truth, as Mr Dean said, could and probably is worse. If you have never heard of this "crime tool" you're not alone. I only heard about it being used once in Vegas. The software was created there. Check it out. Christmas time, bomb threat (of course) and a Frontline investigation. I don't think they found a bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC