Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joy Behar, Matt Taibbi & Jesse Ventura Translate The 'Gibberish' From Palin & Bachmann's Hate-Fest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:25 AM
Original message
Joy Behar, Matt Taibbi & Jesse Ventura Translate The 'Gibberish' From Palin & Bachmann's Hate-Fest
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 02:30 AM by Turborama
 
Run time: 08:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O4RBhC1xQY
 
Posted on YouTube: April 09, 2010
By YouTube Member: MoxNewsDotCom
Views on YouTube: 65
 
Posted on DU: April 09, 2010
By DU Member: Turborama
Views on DU: 3749
 
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbbsAL3pyQg

BEHAR: Two stars of the GOP, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann, joined forces yesterday in Minnesota before 11,000 adoring fans.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. MICHELE BACHMANN (R), MINNESOTA: The last 18 months we have seen nothing less than an economic coup transpired before our eyes.

SARAH PALIN (R), FORMER GOVERNOR OF ALASKA: What`s happening to politicians especially in Washington, they`re becoming addicted to OPM -- O-P-M -- other people`s money.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BEHAR: She is so witty.

Here to help he translate this gibberish are Matt Taibbi, contributing national affairs editor for "Rolling Stone" and Jesse Ventura, former Minnesota governor and author of "American Conspiracies: lie, lies and more dirty lies that the government tells us."

Welcome guys.

JESSE VENTURA, FORMER GOVERNOR OF MINNESOTA: Thank you.

BEHAR: You know these two women are getting famous; pretty famous in the country. Is it helping the GOP?

MATT TAIBBI, CONTRIBUTING EDITOR, "ROLLING STONE": I think it`s helping Sarah Palin. I think if the election were to happen today she`d be the runaway favorite for the nomination.

But the problem is if you add her to Michele Bachmann that`s a ticket that cannot win a general election. So I think the Democrats have to be thrilled that they`re doing this kind of road show together.

BEHAR: Yes. A lot of things they`re doing at the RNC are happy -- making the Democrats happy. Michael Steele, that whole S&M thing -- they`re loving it.

VENTURA: Well, to me, I can`t figure out how they can hold Sarah Palin in such esteem when she quit her job.

BEHAR: Yes.

VENTURA: You know, how come she`s not being questioned on why did you quit? Just to cash in and make a bunch of money and become wealthy?

BEHAR: Well, they give her a pass, Jesse.

VENTURA: I know.

BEHAR: I mean let me tell you what -- some of these things that they`ve said.

Bachmann has said, "I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous." That was Michele Bachmann. Then she also said, "A pedophile, someone who considers themselves gay," first of all, the term -- the one`s a plural and one`s a singular. That annoys me right there.

But is she a liar or is she just stupid when she says something like that? That is so not true.

VENTURA: Right.

TAIBBI: Michele Bachmann makes Sarah Palin look like Marie Curie; I mean she`s a complete ding bat. The more she gets on television the better the Democrats are going to do. I think this has to -- it`s a windfall for the Democratic Party.

VENTURA: I would go the other way. The country has been so dumbed- down now that she may be very successful because it seems to me that the dumber you are and the stupider you are on things you say and positions you take seems to make you more popular right now.

BEHAR: Is that why the Republican Party is -- you know -- takes these people under their wing? They want them to be stupid or they have no choice?

VENTURA: No, I think it`s more a case of these two are puppets and they can be controlled easy. And that`s what they`re looking for. They`re not looking for true leadership; they`re looking for puppets.

BEHAR: You think so? That`s interesting.

TAIBBI: I think it`s just that these are two politicians who resonate with a certain hardcore demographic within the Republican Party but they have absolutely no appeal beyond that. And that`s going to be a limiting factor for the Republicans.

BEHAR: I know, 11,000 people of adoring fans. Ok, big deal. We`re 300 million people in this country.

VENTURA: Well, you can also bet that the 11,000 is a bit pumped high. What`s interesting is when we did the counter-convention to the Republicans with Ron Paul there, Ron Paul and I drew over 15,000.

BEHAR: Oh, so you were a bigger hit than they were.

VENTURA: Oh, yes, we do bigger than that.

BEHAR: And you know Michele Bachmann is from your state. Your state is so interesting.

VENTURA: She`s actually my Congresswoman. I live in here district.

BEHAR: Uh-huh. Really. I mean you have Al Franken, Jesse Ventura and Michele Bachmann. Who ever thought Minnesota was so wacky? You know what I mean? You never think of --

VENTURA: If you call us wacky, what it really truly is, we`re the Mecca of the third-party movement. We have four major parties in Minnesota, not two.

We have my party, the Independents` Party, the Green Party, the Democrats and the Republicans. We all have major party status.

BEHAR: But do you think there will ever really be a viable third party in this country?

VENTURA: No, because the two parties won`t allow it. They make up the rules and they make the rules in essence so that a third party cannot survive. There`s where you`ll see the Republicans and Democrats get in bed together because anytime --

BEHAR: Against the third party?

VENTURA: Against the third party. Any time you see any rise of the third party you will see the Republicans and Democrats then climb into bed.

BEHAR: Go ahead Matt.

TAIBBI: I think the situation is right for a third party, national third party movement.

BEHAR: You do?

TAIBBI: I think both parties have demonstrated in the last eight years that they`re both completely in bed with Wall Street and that they`re incapable of reforming themselves.

And I think there`s widespread frustration out there. You`re seeing it among the Tea party folks and among people on the other side of the spectrum. So I think, you know, if there was a legitimate attractive candidate for the third party that would get a lot of attention.

BEHAR: Yes. Are you running right now?

VENTURA: No. I was just clearing my throat.

BEHAR: I think you`re right. The Tea party is filled with people who are pissed of --

TAIBBI: Correct.

BEHAR: -- and they`re on the right and the left in the country.

TAIBBI: And they should be.

VENTURA: Here`s the key to it, Joy. If you`re going to be a legitimate third-party candidate you cannot be farther left than the Democrats or farther right than the Republicans. You must be a centrist like me.

I`m fiscally conservative, but I`m socially liberal. That eliminates you from the two parties but it`s still centrist. That`s how I won. I occupied the center.

They had to sell out to their wings to get their nomination. Then they immediately beeline back to the center but they couldn`t defeat me because I already had the center. And it`s the center who elects you; not the left or the right. It`s which way they sway?

BEHAR: Isn`t it the way the Republican Party used to be, when Eisenhower was around? You know --

VENTURA: Oh, very much. Elmer Anderson, the former Minnesota governor, he gave me the best quote on abortion that I`ve ever heard. You know what it was? "Abortion is religion`s failure to persuade so now they must legislate." And that came from a Republican, an old Republican.

BEHAR: That`s an old Republican.

VENTURA: An old Republican.

BEHAR: Maybe it will go back to that eventually.

VENTURA: I don`t think so.

BEHAR: All right. After the rally the two starlets appeared on Hannity`s show where Sarah Palin surprisingly came to the defense of RNC chairman Michael Steele who is under fire after it was reported the RNC dropped $2,000 at a bondage-themed nightclub.

Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PALIN: I support Michael Steele. I am glad that he is the leader of the party, administratively. I think it`s been good to have an independent outsider kind of create some change in the Republican Party.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BEHAR: Would you conclude that she`s interested in bondage from that?

VENTURA: No, but what I find -- again, the initial, call it the double standard. Here are the Republicans who are supposed to stand for "family values". Yet behind the scenes they`re as decadent as anybody else walking around on the planet.

BEHAR: But they`re not -- they`re more annoyed with the fact that they spent all that money rather than it was a bondage club, right?

TAIBBI: That`s part of it. But you have to look at the irony of Sarah Palin sharing the stage with somebody who thought that "Aladdin" was pornography. And meanwhile she`s ok with Michael Steel who`s going off to S&M clubs. It doesn`t make a whole lot of sense.

BEHAR: Do you think she -- is she just a hypocrite or she doesn`t understand stuff. I never can figure it out.

TAIBBI: Both. That`s the beauty of Sarah Palin.

BEHAR: Yes. I mean "The Daily Beast` is reporting that the GOP spent $1,000 at Tiffany`s on office supplies. We`re thinking gold-plated nipple clamps. What did they buy? What did they buy?

TAIBBI: That`s actually only $900.

BEHAR: Oh, is it really? How much longer do you give Michael Steele?

VENTURA: I would say I`d give him through the election because I don`t think they want to show weakness and change at this point in time. I think that you`ll see him gone, especially if the results of the 2010 elections don`t come in the favor that they want.

BEHAR: And don`t you think that they`re worried that they can get into trouble by dismissing a black man?

TAIBBI: Absolutely. And he`s sort of sent off a warning flare about that just last week by saying that a black RNC chairman has a slimmer margin of error than maybe a white one would. And that`s kind of like a warning to say, you know, "If you fire me there`s going to be consequences among black Republicans."

BEHAR: Right. He said Obama is in the same margin.

TAIBBI: Exactly. Exactly.

BEHAR: He put him in the category with him.

TAIBBI: Right.

BEHAR: Why? They`re so inconsistent.

Ok. Stay right where you are. We`ll continue this after the break.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BEHAR: During the Palin/Bachmann/Hannity love fest last night the two Republican divas bashed President Obama for signing a nuclear arms treaty. Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PALIN: Unbelievable. Unbelievable. No administration in America`s history would, I think, ever have considered such a step that we just found out President Obama is supporting today. You know, that`s kind of like getting out there on the playground a bunch of kids ready to fight and one of the kids saying, go ahead, punch me in the face and I`m not going to retaliate.

BACHMANN: We need to be adults about terrorism and adults about keeping the American people safe.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BEHAR: So are they right? Did Obama just sign away our safety?

TAIBBI: I don`t see how nuclear weapons are a deterrent against our real threat, terrorists. You can`t really use nuclear weapons against roving terrorists. These are outmoded weapons that are used to fight the old Cold War. And I think it`s sensible for us to have a cooperative agreement with the Russians.

BEHAR: Ok.

VENTURA: What I find most intriguing is what President Obama did here. It goes exactly with the pinnacle of the Republican who they want to put at Mt. Rushmore -- Ronald Reagan.

BEHAR: Right.

VENTURA: When you see what Ronald Reagan said about nuclear bombs when he made a speech in China, it paralleled Barack Obama completely to what he said. So how can they have it both ways? Reagan is their icon, and yet Reagan felt the same way about nuclear weapons as President Obama has.

BEHAR: Yes, that`s true.

VENTURA: Yes. How can they do that? How can Ronald Reagan, the greatest Republican of the century --

BEHAR: Oh my god, he`s canonized --

VENTURA: Yes. And yet he sits right where President Obama sat when you heard him talk about nuclear weapons. How quick they forget, huh?

BEHAR: That`s true.

But is it a false notion Democrats are weak on national security? I think it`s a false notion because after Bush invaded Iraq, we became much less safe around the world. More terrorists came out. And it really felt like we were less safe when he was there.

VENTURA: You know what bothers me, Joy, is here they`re talking about now building -- like I saw what`s his name -- the guy with the mustache that used to be in the U.N. --

TAIBBI: Bolton.

BEHAR: Bolton.

VENTURA: Bolton. Bolton`s talking about we need to build more nuclear weapons.

BEHAR: Yes, I know.

VENTURA: I`m going, excuse me, so we can`t have health care, you can`t go to the doctor but they`ll waste our money on building another bomb? How many times do you need the capability to blow up the earth? We already have that capability.

BEHAR: What is their point then? What are they trying to say? I`m wanting to --

VENTURA: That`s what they`re trying to say. They`re trying to scare the public into believing that we`re in some sort of mega-danger because Barack Obama signs a treaty with the Russians.

TAIBBI: And it`s going to work because this -- if there`s one thing every politician in Washington knows is that if you vote against any weapons system you`re going to be painted as soft on defense. And you`re going to have trouble losing and election. That`s why the defense budget always goes up regardless of what the situation is around the world.

BEHAR: But this seems a ridiculous argument in my opinion. I think people are not that stupid that they would think that if you reduce nuclear weapons in the world you will not be more -- you know safer. It`s outrageous.

TAIBBI: I cover the campaign -- both of the last two campaigns and I`ve seen this in action. People really believe that if you cut weapons systems it`s going to make this less safe. And I think it`s going to -- it will resonate with Republican voters.

BEHAR: Really?

VENTURA: Yes.

TAIBBI: Yes.

BEHAR: How do you rate Obama on foreign policy, in a word because we have to go.

VENTURA: I rate -- on foreign policy, other than increasing the wars I think he`s done exceptionally well on foreign policy. But I hate the fact that we`ve escalated the wars instead of pulled out.

BEHAR: He promised to go into Afghanistan and that`s what he did. Right?

TAIBBI: That`s true. That`s true.

BEHAR: You know, but Palin calls him professor-in-chief. Why does she hate smart people?

Thanks very much, guys.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1004/08/joy.01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Why does Palin hate smart people"
Simple jealousy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the post turbo. It's nice to see some MSM commentary on the dimwitted duo.
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 06:29 AM by geckosfeet
The fact that they get so much attention is alarming. Do people really watch this tripe? Do their ratings warrant continued network airtime?

How dumb/stupid/ignorant has the television viewing audience become?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I fear
that Jesse Ventura is right. Former "pro Wrestler":wtf: about how already "dumbed down" our country is. The only way we will ever get a viable third party is to own a major media outlet. Thank God for "FREE SPEECH T.V.", but it would have to be a major media outlet and be able to compete with faux and the others. Maybe then, the voice of truth could be heard. We will never (at this rate) get the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE reinstated. We are quickly becoming (already there?) an Idiocracy owned by the corptocracy.... America is not a good place to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Palin and Bachmann
are real life female counterparts to Beavis and Butthead. The cold hard fact is, Beavis and Butthead are the rank and file of the Republican Party. The rubes and dupes who buy into the jingoistic hatred fomented by the Palin/Bachmann jihad are essentially frightened, ignorant and impotent.
Running on fear and loathing has been the Republican strategy for years. Palin and Bachmann are just fresh makeup and a new dress on an old whore.
Men tend to believe whatever an attractive woman tells them. Palin and Bachmann are both physically attractive and able to sell anything to the pistol packing moron element that has been prominently on parade since the 2008 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Wizard, you write good stuff. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Thanks for the kind words
DU provides me with a platform that stimulates thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sarah Palin has Juniper Creeker hair
gosh, everytime I look at her I think of Mary Kay Place's hair in Big Love.

Fundie Mormon polygamist hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. +1 from another big love fan. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. I thought the same.
"Fundie Mormon polygamist hair."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just further evidence that we have to rally to defeat these assholes
in 2010. We can NOT allow the repukes to gain ANY power in these next elections. I'm afraid that we will have a weak turn out at the poles because of a false sense of security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Anyone in this country that has a sense of
security, false or otherwise, is kidding themselves. We live in the most dangerous of times. That should be apparent to anyone with the slightest knowledge of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Really?
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 11:07 AM by liberation
Anyone with the slightest knowledge of history should be able to put this idiot Palin and her ilk in their proper context: plain old run of the mill fear mongering.

This is not even close to be the most dangerous time in history.

These people should be laughed at and ridiculed publicly, and I mean a good ol fashion constant humiliation whenever they open their mounts, taking them seriously just gives them more power to their hubris than it deserves. Palin and Bachmann belong in the trash bin of history, and we need to realize it is up to us to put them there.

We have gone through far worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Tell me that after the 2010
and 2012 elections when the fascists have regained power. They already control the media and run the country as is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. watched the show this morning
Joy's show is very entertaining and pithy. Jesse just gets better and better. Thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I would have to agree.
TAIBBI: I think both parties have demonstrated in the last eight years that they`re both completely in bed with Wall Street and that they`re incapable of reforming themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. "Incapable of reforming themselves."
I'm sorry to agree. And this is the entire problem.

I'm with Jesse in that I don't think a viable third party would be allowed to win. Both the Republicans and Democrats would join forces to stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. 3rd parties
Sometimes the "3rd party" is actually funded by the rePIGs.

Whatever happened to John Anderson, who stole 6 million votes from Carter in 1980 and was promptly never heard of again?

And I don't want to inflame the Naderites, but he did get donations from the GOP.

The only "pure" 3rd party guy I can think of since La Follette is Perot, and he was self-financed wacko - but sometimes those wackos help America.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. We need a real & viable third party,
one that represents working America once again. One that believes in a public social safety net that legislators can't get at. One that is actually concerned for the well being of a majority of citizens, not the few connected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. ahh that was refreshing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Reps are 40 years behind us with a Female leader and they're desparate for ANY woman
Us Dems have had female leaders in our party really since starting slowly in the 1950, and blossomed in the 1960's. The Rep women are so desperate for any female leadership (especially before the elderly ladies die). They are 40 years behind us and will take any idiot in a dress. We on the other hand actually expect our female leadership to be intelligent and know what the heck their talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. So their answer is to recruit
brainless bimbos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Too bad the Dem party is hellbent in vaporizing all that...
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 11:10 AM by liberation
... by trying to become more and more like the reps.

The Repugs keep doing what the conservative movement has always done: moving backwards, and a lot of the Dem leadership seem to be all too comfortable with following them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. ".......and a lot of the Dem leadership seem to be all too
comfortable with following them." Can you elucidate by pointing out those Dem leaders who are moving backward ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC