lame54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 04:54 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Mon May-17-10 04:54 PM by lame54
by lame54 Don't forget - they made up the name
|
Grassy Knoll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. :rofl: love that sign nt |
happygoluckytoyou
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. gotta love those TEABIRTHERS... with a special shout out to their band the RUSTY TRUMBONES |
|
so why are they intent on kicking the dirty sanchezs out of arizona
|
butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
3. kick,kick,kick &recommend! |
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Should have bought tea stock |
jfkraus
(378 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message |
Francisco
(132 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-17-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. lol @ down with sodomy up with tea bagging |
ThatsMyBarack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-18-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Welcome to DU, Francisco! |
Francisco
(132 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-18-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
unapatriciated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-18-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
unpossibles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-18-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
it also shows that quite a few of them were using the term for themselves knowing full well what it meant.
|
lame54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-18-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
lame54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-19-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message |