Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Olbermann: Top Secret Manual on Dealing w/ Protesters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 11:15 PM
Original message
Olbermann: Top Secret Manual on Dealing w/ Protesters
 
Run time: 05:50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfXIo81pIsQ
 
Posted on YouTube: August 23, 2007
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: August 23, 2007
By DU Member: Hissyspit
Views on DU: 2492
 
August 22, 2007 - Countdown w/ KEITH OLBERMANN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. How did I know they were gonna have Rachel on for this
Damn she is great! Too bad she plays for the other team :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've never seen her before.
I love her on the radio. She definitely needs to be on the TeeVee more often. easy on the eyes and the ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Go look up her Campaign Asylum vids on youtube
They are fantastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The M Double Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Rachel?
Talk about easy on the eyes..... ALISON STEWART!


& nice post Hissyspit. Unfortunately people need to be reminded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'd wondered if that might be so
Never mind - KD Lang is good singer too. That's her affair not ours. I notice you say "plays for the the other team" whereas we say "bats for the other side"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. You wondered???
Lol She's about as out as someone can get. Allison even introduced her on-air as "our own Gay Bomb" for one segment. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Haircuts, cleavage & "which team".
Great.

A commentator from our side (i.e. factville, capitol of the state of Sanity) with something to say gets on national TV and half the posts here are about how "Hot" she is and "Which team she plays for".

Does it bug you when the media digresses from substantive issues with bits about Edwards' haircut or Hillary's cleavage?

Then why engage in the same sort of time-wasting disrespect here?

Perhaps you're sincere where Faux & CNN are merely looking to talk about anything other than the issues, but it's time to have a bit of discipline, be adult and ask yourself "Is what I'm about to post on subject?"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynthia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rachel comes across as intelligent and articulate
of course it helps to have the host not screaming at her and talking over her, as so often happens when you get the usual conservative blowhards - I can't stand to watch that crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djjimz Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh how proud he must be...
to have those cheering throngs...
:puke:
Seriously, that does make me want to puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. FASCISM IN ACTION
This is how our taxes are spent. CURBING FREE SPEECH

BASTARD REPUBLICANS, GOD I HATE EVERY LAST ONE OF EM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMFORD Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Second that.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Read also this article
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/01/04/INGPQ40MB81.DTL

When President Bush travels around the United States, the Secret Service visits the location ahead of time and orders local police to set up "free speech zones" or "protest zones," where people opposed to Bush policies (and sometimes sign-carrying supporters) are quarantined. These zones routinely succeed in keeping protesters out of presidential sight and outside the view of media covering the event.
When Bush went to the Pittsburgh area on Labor Day 2002, 65-year-old retired steel worker Bill Neel was there to greet him with a sign proclaiming, "The Bush family must surely love the poor, they made so many of us."

The local police, at the Secret Service's behest, set up a "designated free-speech zone" on a baseball field surrounded by a chain-link fence a third of a mile from the location of Bush's speech.

The police cleared the path of the motorcade of all critical signs, but folks with pro-Bush signs were permitted to line the president's path. Neel refused to go to the designated area and was arrested for disorderly conduct; the police also confiscated his sign.

Neel later commented, "As far as I'm concerned, the whole country is a free-speech zone. If the Bush administration has its way, anyone who criticizes them will be out of sight and out of mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. this is sickening, again they are shielding boy-king from the
truth and do not want to burst his bubble, have you ever heard of such, before this dictator abusively came onto the scene.
free speech zones??? what BS, why don't they come right out and say NO DISSENTERS OF BOY KING!!!! truly disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Monkey see no evil, hear no evil, speak no... oh forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Rachel is One Sexy Babe....
i'd protest with her anytime, anywhere.

love that lipgloss action, Ms. Maddow.

are you married?

if not, wanna get married?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Sorry, she's got a very cool, totally committed spouse
Too bad for us guys as well. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Books from Bush, Tanks on Tienemen (sp?) they attempt to do the same thing
Shut us up, stop dissent, keep order at the cost of liberty, it may be working in both places to well. But the times they are 'achanging, Wake up people before it's too late!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Of all the evil the Wregime has perpetrated
it's this that most inspires my ire.

There's a reason Americans' right to express our opinion was granted in the First Amendment to our Constitution — it's the most important right we have. Any dictator would tell you the first step in eliminating an opponent is to silence him, one way or another.

Yet, here's the executive division of our elected (yeah, well...) government, not only denying us that First Amendment right, but employing a coordinated, pre-emptive plan to do so.

Can someone tell me why that alone isn't grounds for impeachment?

And, to top it off, I've never heard a reporter ask anyone in the Wregime why this is done. It's such a basic question, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC