Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9 TRILLION Dollars Missing from Federal Reserve,Fed Inspector General Can't Explain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 07:42 AM
Original message
9 TRILLION Dollars Missing from Federal Reserve,Fed Inspector General Can't Explain
 
Run time: 05:24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYNVNhB-m0o
 
Posted on YouTube: December 12, 2010
By YouTube Member: amy2x
Views on YouTube: 14432
 
Posted on DU: December 14, 2010
By DU Member: Pharaoh
Views on DU: 4555
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where did it go?? I know! POOR PEOPLE! IT WENT TO POOR PEOPLE! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. The way to find a missing something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
52. It's those welfare queens again. Look at 'em in their Mercedes
Why don't they get real jobs?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Our government is so incredibly, wholly and completely corrupt...
watching these types of kabuki exchanges makes me ill. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. great god -- another incompetent idiot. -- how? how can you come before
that committee so unprepared for such obvious questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. If nothing else, plausible deniability proves incompetent is a better defense than complicit.
which is no defense at all.

What is insulting is they don't bother with even remotely plausible anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. As Obama says
Time to move forward, we don't have time to look back.

Here is another regulator, asleep at the wheel. The buck should land on Obama's desk but we already know he'll blame the professional left for being purists and putting this in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's a few trillion here, a few billion there? No-one knows how
much is really missing. The money that is missing in Iraq is probably in the hands of some sheik, the Federal Reserve? This one is scary. Who really keeps the government books? I wonder if anyone knows? Bet not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
54. DOD missing over 2 trillion prior to 9/11
Federal Reserve mission trillions. No wonder WikiLeaks scares the hell out of US. Easier to steal in the darkness and cover of patriotism/money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who appointed this women to the inspector general position?
Nine trillion can't be accounted for. That equals 30,000 for every man women and child in this country. Yet people who were hoodwinked by unscrupulous banking practices are being blamed for irresponsibility, and are being kicked out of their homes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. She was appointed during the Bush Administration
Elizabeth A. Coleman was appointed Inspector General for the Federal Reserve Board effective May 6, 2007.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/oig/oig_bio.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. lost money?
Have they checked the folded-up newspaper in Potter's office? What about at the airport? We put a microscope up granny's butt however when $9 trillion is missing the authorities take 8 months to even know something is missing? My totally ignorant and unsubstantiated opinion (thus qualified for the Beck/Rush conspiracy hour) is that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has it---they are the finance experts. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Put it up "grandpa's butt".
I get the outrage...but getting a little tired of the ugly, patently sexist use of "grandma" for every vulgar expression of imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. ?
Settle down, Beavis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. You "settle down"
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 11:35 AM by whathehell
Butthead...My point is a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
55. Probably wasted it bribing Iraqi's n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. My eyes are popping out of my head Q@(*$&@#*(*@&# n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. I am sure she is spending her time and efforts in investigations of
employee travel vouchers to insure lowest airfares were used for official travel and that meal allowances were not over-expensed.

As the Inspector General, she should not be expected to have any knowledge of Off Balance Sheet transactions of $9T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. A rallying cry for 'AUDIT THE FED' in Congress starting next year?
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 08:38 AM by tomm2thumbs

If one thing can come of the Tea Bagger rebellion in the GOP, perhaps that one thing will be to initiate an ongoing and continuous Congressional-oversight report & hearings on the Fed, to which no doubt the Republican (& even Democratic) Wall Street puppeted representatives would rather not see happen.

We'll see if they really do anything (so far they seem to only scream and rant when running for office put then become lap poodles once elected), but they will certainly have pressure from their minions to shed light on this if they have anything to say about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swampguana Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sounds like her job to is to hide the money rather than keep track of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. the bigger the crime the smaller the punishment
if any
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. Isn't this a 2009 video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. yep
its the same old video with a new headline. Lets not forget who spawned this whole crisis with the TARP bill - Bush bank scam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. No, you've never seen this video before, move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civilisation Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. The rate of rampant fraud and thievery has gone logarithmic..,
The Banksters (including their buddies on wall-street) have long had their hands in the till, skimming and scamming every little bit they can in their role as the vampiric controllers of the money supply, and this thievery has always been expanding. In the last 20-30 years the rate of this wealth shift from the many to the few has seen logarithmic rise, with little to no accountability. The rate of bubble creation and popping (when the wealth is shifted i.e. stolen!) has been getting faster and faster. These evil greedy thieves see that the system is about to implode and are currently ratcheting up the money grabs. All pyramid schemes have a life-cycle and the bottom is falling out of the current money system, the whole thing is coming down. But what should we expect when no one is held to account for their actions?? Without a real democracy, and actual enforced regulations on banking and greed-based corprate-capitalism this is the inevitable outcome. Yuo reep what you,. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
48. Trudat. And belated welcome to DU! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. I hope they get to the bottom of this.
Too bad Rep. Alan Graham is on his way out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. I think you meant Alan Grayson. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. NOWHERE in that clip does it say that...
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 10:09 AM by SDuderstadt
$9 Trillion is missing from the Federal Reserve.

The financial illiteracy and outright ignorance of what the Fed actually does and how it does it by DU members is simply stunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Fine. Missing $9 trillion in Overnight Window transactions at the NY Fed. Make you happy?
That's still a huge amount of use value that's gone unaccounted for all this time. Much of it simply fled offshore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Do you realize how silly that...
claim is? Do you honestly think the Fed could be missing $9T and still function?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. It's not really "missing", just not on the public record, and no questions asked by the NY Fed
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 11:34 AM by leveymg
about what counter-parties did with it.

"Missing" is journalistic license - maybe some people take it literally. But, hey, they don't make institutional decisions. Their lives are just run by those who do know what's really going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Do you understand what Overnight Window transactions are?
Why don't you explain it to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Short-term low-interest loans to Fed Members (PDs), some collateralized
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 11:43 AM by leveymg
What else do you want, a primer on the Repo Market?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. There are posters here that believe...
that $9T is literally missing, as in stolen. It makes DU look silly.

You're not helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm telling the unvarnished truth - the use value is in the billions. The use of these funds
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 11:55 AM by leveymg
have not been accounted for in the public record, the identities of the banks and the amounts they borrow is not revealed, and neither the source nor amount of the profits made on investments on these funds are not reported to the Fed by the Primary Dealers that have had access to the window in these special post Q3 2008 "emergency" transactions.

How is this not helping? Who am I not helping? What's wrong with the information I'm giving out?

What do you want me to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. You could start by telling those who think $9T has been...
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 12:08 PM by SDuderstadt
stolen that it's simply not true.

Do you honestly think that whipping up anti-Fed hysteria (referring to the OP) is helpful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Ok - the profits on $9T have been given away by the Fed 0-interest. Principal wasn't stolen.
Happy now?

I'm not whipping up anti-Fed hysteria. I'd just like to see all the mechanizations and profits involving Fed funds, liquidity injection and bank stimulus on the public record. That's not too much to ask in your opinion, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. You obviously missed the part where...
I referred to the OP whipping up anti-Fed hysteria, not you.

P.S. When do Overnight Window loans have to be repaid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I got the feeling there was a bit of guilt by association in your remarks. Aspersions, anyway.
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 12:50 PM by leveymg
It used to be settle same business day, repayable the next. Not sure if that rule still applies to PDCF funds. The primary difference between this program and the previous is that basically any sort of collateral, even basically worthless CDOs and MBS can be put up, and the amounts borrowed by each Primary Dealer is not publicly reported by the Fed.

Please correct me on any of these details. I used to work on the Floor of the NYSE, not in bonds. What is your interest in this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. There was no "guilt by association"...
that's why I made it clear I was referring to the OP.

My interest in this is making sure legitimate questions about oversight and transparency don't get drowned out by silly anti-Fed propaganda aimed at DU's shoot-first, ask-questions-later brigade.

I appreciate your factual contribution. I don't think proper oversight and increased transparency should come at the cost of the Fed's independence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. OK - we're square.
I do my own share of patrolling around here. Sometimes I enjoy the fire for a while, before I start hosing the crowd, though.

My advise to you is approach with humor and sympathy if you want people to listen to you. They turn on those who offer correction that aren't immediately perceived as friendly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I don't believe...
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 01:02 PM by SDuderstadt
the shoot-first, ask-questions-later brigade is really interested in facts or corrections, no matter how humorous or friendly the offer. It's like DU's version of FR. They just happen to be good people on our side who, nonetheless, aren't interested in getting the facts straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
53. Why don't you explain what you mean in terms that the uninitiated
can understand, leveymg?

Please share your knowledge. We all come to DU to learn from each other. Each of us has something to give to others, some knowledge or experience. Rather than just putting other DUers down, please state in a patient, compassionate way whatever it is that you feel you know and that others don't know.

So far, your post leaves me thinking that you enjoy feeling superior to others on DU, but that you can't really clearly explain what you believe that others don't know. I mean that I have the impression that you enjoy feeling superior but either don't really understand whatever it is that you know that is justifying your superior attitude or you want to keep the knowledge that makes you feel so superior to yourself.

This is a community. We share our knowledge. Please share yours without being snide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. really? you don't understand why people could think that
the Fed drastically needs transparency and oversight and that there should be a public accounting for shuffled funds?

Gee, why could people possibly think the Federal government is incapable of policing itself???

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/10/iraq_billions200710

The Spoils of War
Billions over Baghdad
Between April 2003 and June 2004, $12 billion in U.S. currency—much of it belonging to the Iraqi people—was shipped from the Federal Reserve to Baghdad, where it was dispensed by the Coalition Provisional Authority. Some of the cash went to pay for projects and keep ministries afloat, but, incredibly, at least $9 billion has gone missing, unaccounted for, in a frenzy of mismanagement and greed. Following a trail that leads from a safe in one of Saddam's palaces to a house near San Diego, to a P.O. box in the Bahamas, the authors discover just how little anyone cared about how the money was handled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. No, I said that...
$9T wasn't stolen.

Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klingon Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
57. Nowhere in the clip does it say anything
She's just stonewalling.

She "does not know" the answer to any of the questions.

She's always "in the process" of looking at that. She gives the impression of being hired last week.

As for the financial illiteracy on this forum, do you believe that the DU members are worse than the average public? If not, who's fault is it that people cannot understand what the Fed actually does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Try taking a macroeconomics class...
dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. Did you check the sugar jar?
Sometimes some missing coin in our house winds up in the sugar jar.

Better check it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
24. The PTB
will sure be glad when Mr. Grayson is gone.
What a loss for Americans..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
45. Did anyone check with Dick Cheney and KBR and the biggest banks?
I'm sure if they look under the table......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
List left Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
46. what impressive self control he has
I am greatly impressed by this mans integrity and self control. I would have lost it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. Unacceptable.
Wrong answer--NO ONE loses 9 trillion dollars. Money NEVER disappears, it only changes hands. Time for an investigation.

American People must demand this money be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
50. Five TRILLION that the Federal Reserve can't account for
and the several TRILLION that the Pentagon can't find AND these Fed Reserve folks and the Pentagon want to shake their fingers at the poor folks on Social Security to make up for their deficits. SHAME. SHAME. SHAME!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
51. K&R
Monkey with the paper

When the U.S., and then the world's money economy started to crumble, the first thing capitalist economists could think of to do was to monkey with the paper. That's all they knew how to do. It was unthinkable that the tertiary virtual economy, that great backroom fraud of debt manipulation and fiat money, might have finally reached the limits of the material earth to support. That the money economy's gaming of workers and Mother Nature might itself be the problem never occurred to the world's economic movers and shakers. It still hasn't. (Except for Chavez, Morales, Castro and Lula).

Jobs disappeared, homes went to foreclosure, and personal debt was at staggering all time highs. America's working folks were taking it square in the face. Not that economists or financial kingpins cared much one way or the other. In the capitalist financial world, everything is an opportunity. Cancer? Build cancer hospital chains. Pollution? Sell pollution credits. The country gone bankrupt? "Nothing to do," cried the mad hatters of finance, "but print more money, and give gobs of cash to the banks! Yes, yes, yes! Borrow astronomical amounts of the stuff and bribe every fat cat financial corporation up and down The Street!" All of which came down to creating more debt for the common people to work off. They seem willing enough to do it too -- if only they had jobs.

http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2010/07/waltzing.html">Joe Bageant, "Waltzing at the Doomsday Ball"


I'm sure Obama will appoint a Blue Ribbon Commission to look into it all and they'll discover that the money went into the black hole of Social Security and that's why we need to privatize part of it and get rid of the rest.


- Oh. And also to disallow the importation of cat food into this country from Canada..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
56. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
59. That woman is a CLOWN!
Every response was the very definition of "evasive" and "mealy-mouth".

It would appear that the job of the Inspector General is to handwave and deflect and make sure no one takes too close a look at the books.

That was a shockingly bad performance on her part. You would think that, knowing she would be questioned by Grayson, she would have prepared. Instead, she obviously did not prepare to do anything other than stonewall, which is yet another sign of the utter contempt these people have for the government and us citizens.

K&R for Grayson's excellent skewering of another empty suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
60. The end of the Empire, the looting of Rome
this is like the Rodney King riots being held inside of the Fed. Smash, grab and run.

Oh wait... "we can't comment bc the investigation is on-going and I haven't seen the Bloomberg article and I don't have authority"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC