Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Nuclear Warhead Blunder Prompts U.S. Defense Stand-down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 02:59 AM
Original message
CNN: Nuclear Warhead Blunder Prompts U.S. Defense Stand-down
 
Run time: 03:22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-QucOHjarA
 
Posted on YouTube: September 15, 2007
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: September 16, 2007
By DU Member: Hissyspit
Views on DU: 1766
 
September 14, 2007 - CNN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Small marker on the outside to designate the missile as having a nuclear warhead"
Seems like I recall conversations here on DU from former mils that there was NO WAY to confuse a nuclear equipped vs a non-nuclear equipped Cruise Missile.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
307 MMS Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nukes
Correct...there is no way! The fact that this happened has "the unitary executive" written all over it...re: Dick Cheney.
For 4 years, I was a weapons mechanic on B-52s, loading nukes stateside and live ordnance for a year in Thailand while we illegally bombed Cambodia, per Nixon/Kissinger. I was there when they got caught by Congress and we stopped in August of '73.
But, I digress. Something very covert or very wrong happened at Minot AFB to get that bird to Barksdale, which happens to be a "superwing". There's more Buffs there than any other base. It's like a "launching pad" if you will, for staging to war zones. Was there, too, TDY from Loring AFB, ME in 1972. Crazy place.
Just the fact that those nukes went airborne and no one knew...sorry, I'm not buyin' it. Some true patriot had to rat that out and foil someone's covert plan, on probably Iran. How many may have already been successfully staged can not, at this point, be known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. This is the Nightmare having a Crazy idiot in charge of the red
button

this proves it that this was a MISTAKE is not feasible this was intentional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why a small marker, why not a large marker? These are atomic weapons for Christ sake!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
307 MMS Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Marker
There should be a red "flag" about 12" long with a ring with a pin on it at the end. That pin goes into an area of the pylon where a shackle is and assists in inadvertant release of the weapon. Pin is to be pulled before flight by the crew chief.
Who knows what they had planed for those "pickles".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. hmmmm......CNN keeping story alive? Is this good or a set up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well Congress needs to investigate this
and the death of soldier who leaked it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm lost. Are there more mils who say that it is a bogus cliam then
those who say that a real nuclear transfer took place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't get why Cheney would use nuclear to take out nuclear. Why
contaminate the very embassy-city you built (obstentationally) and why take out the guys who are going to protect YOUR pipelines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I wondered the same thing Nukes are not a deterrent
but it reminds me of the madness of Atlantis where civilization destroyed itself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Very simples, neocons want America to use nuclear weapons
...to bring total submission and surrender by the enemy target and also any other nation which challenges U.S. dominance. They want supreme power and unchallenged control, period! They believe that by using nuclear weapons they will have that and no one will attempt to take that away from them because, they, the neocons will not hesitate to use nuclear bombs against anyone. They also believe that the majority of Americans will support them in their insane quest, basically for the same reasons, total fear and terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimba Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. They may not have dropped it on a target
What if, say, a low yield nuke went off in a remote part of Iran? Would that not be the perfect excuse for Bushco to execute their planned bombing campaign? Nobody would believe crazy Iran when they say it wasn't them testing a nuclear device, and the US can deny using nukes, but could still take out Iran with conventional weapons. Some years ago I would never have believed something like that could happen but now I'm not so sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. So this stand down was on the 14th?
Edited on Sun Sep-16-07 02:29 PM by iaviate1
I was under the impression the stand-down was planned for a while... even before the incident. And now it seems CNN seems to be tying it to the nuke error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC