HarveyDarkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 08:06 PM
Original message |
Bill O'Reilly's Pathetic Argument For Intelligent Design |
|
Run time: 06:10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtDsaLWcFEI
Posted on YouTube: February 09, 2011
By YouTube Member: C0ct0pusPrime
Views on YouTube: 308
Posted on DU: February 10, 2011
By DU Member: HarveyDarkey
Views on DU: 1033 |
|
Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The Prince of Tides is at it again |
DrGee5
(142 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
AlbertCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Of course the actual story, as science understands it, of how the moon got there and why it's the size and distance it is from the Earth, and the implications of these calculations, is amazing and a great story.
Bill should watch the Science Channel....or Discovery Channel sometime, since I'm sure he hasn't time to repeat 9th grade science.
Actually I think Bill=o's shit is full of shit. He's just playing to his audience. Of course he knows science explains those things; He just doesn't really care how the tides work. And he will never ever admit he said something stupid.
|
liberation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
4. That's why circular arguments are so hilarious. |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-09-11 08:46 PM by liberation
And why religions that encourage them can be dangerous.
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. well, loofah boy is certainly an argument that there is no such thing as INTELLIGENT design |
AsahinaKimi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
6. O'Reilly probably believes he did it... |
|
After all his ego barely fits in the universe.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |