thomhartmann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:55 AM
Original message |
| Thom Hartmann: Scott Walker is the face now - but the first culprit was 100 years ago. |
|
Run time: 05:43
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQzim2UI9M
Posted on YouTube: March 14, 2011
By YouTube Member: TheBigPictureRT
Views on YouTube: 73
Posted on DU: March 14, 2011
By DU Member: thomhartmann
Views on DU: 1394 | The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann on RT TV "live" 9pm and 11pm check www.thomhartmann.com/tv for local listings |
| jemelanson
(254 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
| craigmatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I knew this wasn't a new thing. |
|
As a matter of fact we had a whole era of this kind of class warfare it was called the guilded age. Come to think of it, it feels like this is a new guilded age only instead of the governemnt being small and do nothing, it's large and actually helping these companies rape the middle class.
|
| Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
>>>>only instead of the governemnt being small and do nothing, it's large and actually helping these companies rape the middle class.>>>>
Politically, the situation is MORE of a challenge now than it was then.
|
| usrname
(134 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
It's worth reading Mark Twain's book, "The Gilded Age." It's subtitle is "A Tale of Today" and it definitely reads like today.
|
| dotymed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 20score
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 12:36 PM by 20score
|
| dotymed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. If "the short summary had no legal standing whatsoever" |
|
then how, in the last 100 years, and this has been brought up repeatedly, has that false "cliff note" version of this case not been corrected? Lawyers have argued huge cases based on that false case summary heading. I knew this fact previous to this post but I still do not understand how a false header note has had the weight of law.
|
| 90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Thom is a national treasure.
And I have the exact same question as the post directly above.
-90% Jimmy
|
| pam4water
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| LaPera
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Thom always an interesting history teacher-Especially history Republicans desperately try to hide! |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 04:09 PM by LaPera
|
| guruoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Does any written record of the decision exist other than this court reporter's notes? |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 12:22 AM by guruoo
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
