Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geologist who predicted 1989 Bay Area Earthquake says major one will occur March 19th on West Coast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:50 AM
Original message
Geologist who predicted 1989 Bay Area Earthquake says major one will occur March 19th on West Coast
 
Run time: 05:01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQXDt4VdS0E
 
Posted on YouTube: March 16, 2011
By YouTube Member: TheZenoEffect
Views on YouTube: 304
 
Posted on DU: March 16, 2011
By DU Member: stockholmer
Views on DU: 8796
 
he offers a multitude of predictive signs and causational factors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. There have been a lot of different groups saying there are more
major quakes to come. Seems a lot of them are really worried about the Pacific Ring of Fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. another interview with Berkland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. stop!
yikes.

and he did not predict the 1989 earthquake. he's been putting out a newsletter for years (which he charges for) and the way he writes it, can claim to predict any earthquake anywhere.

please stop, this is alarming people and Berkland is really problematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. please don't quote this crackpot --USGS staff (where he worked) wouldn't even say his name to me
this was back in the 1990's.

he has this newsletter that sadly, one of my relatives used to receive. it was nonsense and he was always sort of "predicting" something, but it was all so vague, it was like astrology or cold reading in that it could always be right but never could be wrong.

then he started going on Art Bell all the time.

he had one interesting idea (about the lost pets index) without a causal link, but then he just took it and other things to very nonscientific levels.

huge unrec.

if you're going to panic, never do it because of this man.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhippydude Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. fokkks news
is quoting art bell for science?...actualy art probably does have more facts!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. actually, once I heard Art Bell's name, he lost all credibility.
I think that you can learn more about Art Bell here: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crackpot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrawlingChaos Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. ah yes, it's coming back to me now
As a Bay Area resident who was hit hard by Loma Prieta, I remember being irritated by the local media promoting his predictions, which were playing havoc with my raw nerves. Didn't he predict a second large quake in the Bay Area to take place shortly after Loma Prieta which, needless to say, never materialized? And yet Cavuto refers to his impressive track record. :eyes: I'm pretty sure he's not even a real geologist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. he is a real geologist (Im not claiming this guy is 100% correct,just opened this up for discussion)
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 06:31 AM by stockholmer
50+ publications in Geology Listed in 8 Who’s Who publications, including Who’s Who in America

Fellow, Geological Society of America
Member, Assoc. Engin. Geologists
Member, Assoc. Earthquake Engineering Research Inst. (Past VP San Francisco Section)
Member, Peninsula Geological Society (Past Treasurer)
Member, American Association for the Advancement of Science
Member, American Archeological Soc.
Co-founder and past President, SABER SOC. (Soc. for Adapting Building to the Environment Reasonably)
Taught Geology at Appalachian State University and San Jose State University

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Berkland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrawlingChaos Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. I thought I remembered a lack of qualifications...
...so I gave it a quick googling. The following article mentions that he does not have a graduate degree:

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_13574281

So I guess it depends on how you define geologist. I assume he had a hand in that Wikipedia page.

I hear what you're saying about opening something up for discussion. I just know from firsthand experience that stuff like this creates anxiety for people in quake-prone areas in a way that doesn't translate to anything helpful, and it should be underscored that this person has made many, many predictions that came to nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I heard Berkland's thing about the lost pets (this was on a local radio show in
about 1990), and shortly after we had a quake. I went to the library to look up the Seattle Times on microfiche (!) and the number of lost animals had tripled in the two or three days prior to the quake, which was interesting but really kind of made sense. I never really bothered to 'track' it, though. I heard him on Art Bell several times but as you say, his 'predictions' were so vague I never really paid attention. I know when he'd do a follow up show he'd go "and I predicted a X magnitude quake in this area between the dates of X and X, and there was this quake.... so that was a hit. I'd go "huh?" -- soooooo not on the mark. I wouldn't pack my bags and head for the hills based on what he says.

Now just watch, this one will come to pass! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I was at USGS in Menlo Park (his former workplace) and...
While at a fair down there, I asked some staff there about him.

The staffer said, "we don't say that name around here".

:rofl: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. This guy is 100% right!
Work with me here.... I see a huge opportunity.....maybe we can induce mass suicide of Fox vieweres if we spread enough of these rumors. I am sure we can get Glenn Beck involved since he already has an apocolyptic theme going on his show. In fact, if he can sell them Gold before the end of the World, he will be in for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, I already told my
relatives to not even come looking for me when the big one happens here. My neighborhood will turn to liquid and empty into the Strait.
A 9.0 has been predicted here, due to the Ring of Fire, for years but that did not stop those in charge from building the only hospital on a cliff, build a town on fill next to the harbor or have only one road out of here.

A local man writes a letter to the editor periodically, instructing people how to prepare but no one takes him seriously. That is too bad because he is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Where are you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Sequim n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. You know I just read something in the last couple of days
that was talking about a fish kill that happened off the coast of Japan about a week before their quake hit. Can't remember where I saw it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. That would certainly fuck up the global economy. Keep your eyes on Solar activity,
and therefore that of terrestrial magnetosphere.



The sun is quieting down as the last of the recent big sunspots, AR1169, rotates off the western limb. NOAA forecasters estimate a slight 1% chance of X-flares during the next 24 hours.
http://www.spaceweather.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. Puts on my incredulous hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spicegal Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's pretty scary. Seems like California is about due for
an earthquake. We've had some biggies lately - Haiti and now Japan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Haiti, then Chile, then New Zealand multi, now Japan multi, just draw the path on the rim of fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. And the world is going to end in May. Or in 2012. Or something like that.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scottybeamer70 Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. and, and, and.......
all the crazies are coming out of the woodwork now!
They have all suddenly become experts and predictors of doom. Ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. MArch 19th would be my guess, too......
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 07:42 AM by Uben
...since we will be experiencing a "super moon" on that date. That means the moon will be the closest it's been to earth since '92.
I think he suspects the gravitational pull from the moon will cause the disaster, and it may well happen.

As a precaution, I'm gonna go ahead and eat all my M&Ms now so they don't get wasted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. You could have warned this was on Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. Well, I'll let you know after Saturday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. My fear too
I have tracked the clockwise motion of the quakes for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. Just saw on another thread that a dog predicted one too?
Not sure if the one in Japan or the dog is predicting one to come?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. Weather forecasters do better than earthquake predictors
and that's not saying much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC