Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Stern on Victoria Jackson homophobic statements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
romantico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 03:36 PM
Original message
Howard Stern on Victoria Jackson homophobic statements
 
Run time: 13:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E07QCyLOI0M
 
Posted on YouTube: March 27, 2011
By YouTube Member: trentmorrison
Views on YouTube: 247
 
Posted on DU: March 27, 2011
By DU Member: romantico
Views on DU: 6411
 
I know a lot people have issues with Howard Stern, but I have been agreeing with him more and more lately. He nails it here while discussing hate monger Victoria Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not usually a Stern fan, but this is excellent.
Listened to all of it, and glad I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He made some very good points.
Especially about adoption and kids.

Agreed, Worth the 12 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savalez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Good clip. I really like what he says from the 5:00 mark on.
He slams Republicans for their crazy attacks on Planned Parenthood, Gays in the military and Abortion. Then he wraps it up with a pro-adoption rant and caps it off by slamming the birthers. I'm glad the said this stuff because lots of people listen to his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I've been listening to him over 15 years
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 12:57 PM by Hawaii Hiker
He's very socially liberal (he's voted for every democratic candiate for president since 1992)...Some don't like his jokes and the skits, but I've always enjoyed his show...He had a great rant on Sarah Palin a couple months ago that someone posted here as well...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kag Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. More power to ya'
I had to stop about half way through so I would have to listen the nails-on-chalkboard that is Victoria Jackson's voice. It's not bad enough that she's an idiot. That voice is just painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. not watching it
because at best, even if he nailed this issue, he's one hell of a hate mongering hypocrite.

"I just wanna take that piece of ass body, put tape over her mouth, and do things to her. . And then like, I reach in, I yank out her vocal cords and then she just orally satisfies me by the pool. Oh, she’s totally a mute Kim. And she’s totally nude. . And then I break her legs and position them in the back of her head so that she’s sitting, and they’re permanently fixed like that." -- Howard Stern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Stern trades Homophobic statements for Mysogynist ones..Sorry, not watching either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. and then people defend with no, he doesnt hate women. look robin, his wife... scum is
what he is.

and i agree... not watching either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Ditto
I don't do Stern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. And the first hit he takes on her?
She's fat. Cheap, stupid and obvious shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. She's fat.
Let's see... he mentions she's fatter than when he used to have her on his show. Then, after she rants and rails about the Bible saying being gay is a sin, Howard points out that gluttony is also a sin and maybe Victoria should look to herself first before pointing fingers at everyone else.


Didn't seem so cheap and stupid to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. It's also relevant to the fact Vicky thinks Hollywood had abandoned her....
....because she's a Christian conservative. I say it's because in addition to having little talent, her looks were vital to the only role she could play, the cute blonde ditz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Stern's a hypocritical hate monger himself...He's a mysogynist...Not watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. you keep repeating that
so why come on the thread??

you would do yourself a favor to watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
33.  so why come on the thread??
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 12:31 PM by AlbertCat
Must be the "new" liberal open mindedness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. Because I feel like it.
Apparently the (not so new) liberal "open mindedness"

thinks homophobia is bad but shitting on females

isn't.

Sorry, a lot of us in the latter group call bullshit hypocrisy on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
53. Yes, I do
because some here appear

to be slow learners.:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. An amusing footnote to the whole Victoria Jackson thing
Edited on Sun Mar-27-11 09:36 PM by WhoIsNumberNone
Here's what one small time right wing blogger had to say about Victoria Jackson:

Victoria Jackson is a Shill for Obama


President Obama has been secretly manipulating Conservative media. An anonymous hack of HBGary Inc's emails reveals that US Secretary of State personally appealed to former SNL Alum Victoria Jackson to maliciously spread ridiculous claims on the site. I'd love to see her source on this- I just went to anonleaks and couldn't find anything to support this claim- #0)Employing thousands of fake accounts on World Net Daily Jackson would attain an inflated role in Conservative media- leaving real conservatives no choice but to repeat Jackson asinine ravings. This would in tern lead the intellectual backers of the conservative party to leave and become Libertarians.

Experts agree that so far the plan has worked. so far. CNN political analyst David Gergen calling it the most Orwellian way to destroy what used to be a valid political party. Gergen went on to explain "What people don't understand is that 5 years ago- the Republicans weren't all fat, old, white men afraid of everything- there used to be smart people too, but when you've got people like Jackson talking about Obama's transgender army , of course everyone with a shred of dignity is going to leave. Then you end up with a party of fat old guys jacking it to that pig faced Asian lady."

It will come as no surprise to Obama's critics that his Obama's own arrogance may have been what caused the plan to ultimately be revealed. In his mad desire for control over the Conservative movement, Obama is said to have ordered 15,000 fake accounts on World Net Daily. This would give Obama the ability to control every third message posted to World Net Daily. HBGary inc, was the only company capable of delivering the accounts. It is unknown how many accounts were created, but it is known that the accounts are still active. World Net Daily Founder Joseph Farah, who spoke on the condition of anonymity replied to accusations of assisting Obama by saying "Obama was offering to pay me to use my site. As a conservative- I had to let the market decide. Anyway the Obama bots are easy enough to spot if you look closely enough."

The leaders of the Conservative movement have been calling for Jackson to step down in the wake of the scandal. Others, have been demanding all their leaders submit to a lie detector while taking a conservative purity pledge. As of press time there are only two figureheads who refused to take the test: Victoria Jackson, and former RNC Chairman Michael Steele.

(Again- no sourcing anywhere in the article- The only link she includes is to a World Net Daily article about Obama trying to force the military to accept gays/transgenders.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Oooooo... interesting! Can you say "tin foil helmut"?
:tinfoilhat:

But what do TERNS have to do with it?

This would in tern lead the intellectual backers ... to use the right word, perhaps.

Others, have been demanding all their leaders submit to a lie detector while taking a conservative purity pledge.

That's really funny! Lie detectors! When are they gonna demand lie detector tests while they ask "are JOBS your #1 priority, Mr. Boehner?"

"What people don't understand is that 5 years ago- the Republicans weren't all fat, old, white men afraid of everything-

They've been "fat, old, white men afraid of everything" for as long as I've lived! And I was born in 1957. Just because William F. Buckley APPEARED intellegent...

Don't blame Liberals for allowing the John Birch Society and fundigelicals to have power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. she deserves to be excoriated and Stern does it with aplomb
jackson should never be allowed any space between herself and her comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. This was great! He used to endorse the republicans when he was on radio in NY
Good to hear he's not on board with this brand of crazies.

He's so funny and I hope he comes back to terrestrial radio on day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
57. That was until he got in trouble with the FCC.
Now he's a born again progressive.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I detest them both. Not watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. I don't understand
why do the Stern haters come on this thread, just to tell us they hate him.

This isn't about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. People believe what they want to believe
I've listened to Stern for years. I never really listened to it for the T&A material. That is not my cup of tea. But about 80% of his show isn't T&A material.

Like thousands of other comedians, he's a performer. He's not a misogynist. He built a career saying shocking things to do just that...SHOCK. Just like George Carlin, Richard Pryor, Robin Williams, Sarah Silverman, Joan Rivers, Gilbert Gottfried, etc.

As someone who did talk radio I can tell you many times you say things to "get the lines going." You say things to get the competitor to talk about you. You say things to get people to call the station GM and complain. You say things to make people talk about you to other people. You say things to get ratings. Stern is the master of doing this. He's built a media empire based on this.

I always ask Stern haters to reference one time he's been in the media for doing ANYTHING bad off the air. They can never name anything. I know people that know him directly. He's a pussycat off the air. He's never had a DUI, drug overdose, been reported to beat his wife (either one of them), never harmed his daughters, never stirred the pot. It's an act folks, not reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. He's playing a character
He's every bit that angry white male frustrated with the world but reveals his own feelings of total inadequacy and self-loathing while doing it. The other difference is that unlike Rush Limpballs or O'Lielly (who never reveal their own shortcomings and weakness), he doesn't expect anyone to take him seriously and make political decisions based on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Agreed. I've never been able to listen to Carlin for more than three minutes
without wanting to throw up; nevertheless he appealed to a certain audience and maybe that audience might otherwise not have ever heard his rather enlightened perspective. Same thing with Stern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Because their outrage must be heard!
And you must accept it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Because people speak out against bigots here.
I'm surprised you're surprised.

If someone presented a video of David Duke talking intelligently about a select form of bigotry, I would speak out against that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. because some duers embrace a sexist scuz when we are suppose to be progressive
and if we were to put up something limbaugh said that we agreed with, you would have many on to call him out for what he is.

stern doesnt belong on du, regardless how many times his words are brought here.

any progressive should reject the man. but then sexism is not so much an issue. racism, homophobia, whole different animal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aryo Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. Stern is a disgusting racist as well
Routinely calls for the mass murder of Arabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. See Post No. 15...
It's an act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Who cares if it's "an act?"
It's an act he's been banking on for almost thirty years, and frankly it's an act that de-legitimizes any decent opinions he might hold in real life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. As I say above--Limbaugh says it's all an act, too. I'm not about to let him off
with that--same with Stern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Except Rush Limbaugh expects to be taken as a serious political influence
Stern does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Carol O'Conner Banked on it also
Everyone knew it was just Archie Bunker but it was an act.

Limbaugh is an act. Yes I don't like what he says...but he's an entertainer. He has a right to say stupid shit and we have a right not to listen. But it's an act with him.

For whatever reason I don't think Sean Hannity is an act. He seems a little TOO serious about his spew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Um, Carol O'Connor was a professional actor, playing a character named
Archie Bunker on a sitcom, for which writers wrote scripts. He didn't go on the air as HIMSELF calling people dingbats and meatheads.

In a similar vein, James Earl Jones isn't really Darth Vader.

In short: analogy fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. No fail at all Chorophyll
Actually you made my point. These ARE actors. Whether you are playing a role on a sitcom, a TV talk show host, a radio talk show host, it is an acting role. Stern and his crew WRITE the show every day. Yes some of it is spontaneous, but much of it is done through planned bits and parodies.

Do you think you KNOW Oprah because you watch her show? You don't know anything about who she is off the air. How about Dr. Phil? Dr. Laura? You don't know anything about who these people are because they are actors/entertainers.

People thought they knew Mel Gibson...especially the religious folks. Then he gets shit-faced in public and goes on a verbal tirade against the Jews. Then later tapes release of him threatening to kill his wife and a bunch of other horrible things.

How about Jerry Springer? He has a rather interesting show. He has come clean many times saying he never watches his own show. He's an entertainer and does the gig because it pays a fortune.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. This is ridiculous.
Once more:

Carol O'Connor played a character named Archie Bunker. He did not have a radio show called "Carol O'Connor" on which he spewed a bunch of opinions that he didn't hold in real life.

Oprah, Dr. Phil, Dr. Laura, Jerry Springer -- ALL have shows on which they are ostensibly portraying THEMSELVES. It's not "Oprah Winfrey as Margaret Krabappel in 'A Room Full of Schmucks,' it is merely Oprah Winfrey, despite scripts and directors.

Personally, I don't feel that I "know" any of these people, nor do I care to.

Now go study television and learn the difference between a sitcom and a talk show. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Not ridiculous at all my friend
Your original statement was: "it's an act that de-legitimizes any decent opinions he might hold in real life."

The question is why? An act is an act. Why would that de-legitimize anything he says? You said your self that it's an act and yet he has a "real life" outside of being on the air. What's the difference if it is radio or TV?

YOU might not like a certain brand of humor...and YOU might think his act de-legitimizes any other decent opinions...but to ME that is short cited and narrow thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. It's a bad analogy, my friend
and I would bet that any criticism of Stern would consititue "short cited (sic) and narrow thinking" to you.




P.S. It's "short sighted", not short "cited".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. I stand corrected on cited versus sighted. Long day.
You'd lose your bet about Stern criticism. This isn't about defending Stern. There's been plenty of things he has said over the years that turned me off. The same thing goes for many comedians.

But that still doesn't change my opinion that because an entertainer says something stupid occasionlly de-legitimizes any other opinion they have in "real-life." That's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Sorry, but I don't buy the he's playing a "character" bit...That's used as a "cover" for
when he says something particularly heinous.

Chlorophyll was right..Archie Bunker is a "character" -- Howard Stern is Howard Stern

As for the idea that he "says something 'stupid' occasionally"..Many of us

would change 'stupid' to "abusive" "ugly" and "bigoted" and the "occasionally"

to "lots of times".

I'm sure that it's likely even a KKK member says SOMETHING worthwhile about SOMETHING

once or twice in their lives, but that doesn't mean I intend to listen to him when he does, especially since

it's unlikely to be something I've YET to hear from anyone else interested in this issue.

Sorry, but there's lots of better minds than Stern's I can turn to, if I feel the need.

BTW, I notice that, like most who like Stern here, you're a male.

Big Surprise, because in Stern's world, everyone EXCEPT White progressive Males

deserves a put down and it's easy to be "tolerant" of his "stupid" remarks, when YOU

are not the Target of them.

Too many "progressive" here men have yet to "get" that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #51
61. Once more, my friend:
Carol O'Connor: played a character named Archie Bunker on TV.
Howard Stern: goes on radio (and has been on TV) as HOWARD STERN.

And yes, as Howard Stern, he has said a lot of truly loathsome shit. If I want my opinion of Victoria Jackson seconded, I would not "cite" Howard Stern as a source.

Ta-ta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. You are correct, Chorophyll...Stern distances himself as a "character" for occasions when
he's said something more hideous than his usual spew.

It's bullshit for the apologists and the attempt to analogize him

him to "Archie Bunker" could hardly be more tortured.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #50
59. What about Jack Benny?
He played himself, sort of. Was he a miser and a terrible violinist? Did he hate Fred Allen?

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. So is Limbaugh--or so he says. Just sayin'--I don't have a dog in this fight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Limbaugh says the same thing.
Do you excuse him for his "act?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Limbaugh says the same thing.
I think the difference is:

Stern expects his audience to know he is an act.

Limbaugh expects his audience to believe he's really NOT an act and he only says that to deflect librul critics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. I couldn't have said it better AlbertCat
The shows actually don't compare at all. Limbaugh sits around making up facts to his various claims regarding politics. He preaches his facts as gospel and truth. We can easily sit around and debunk his lies which is exactly what we do. But I also understand he's an entertainer. I don't know Limbaugh personally and don't have any idea what he's like off the air. His on-air persona is certainly rascist. But does he care either way off-air about race?? Who knows for sure.

Of course one thing we do know is that Limbaugh has doctor-shopped for illegal prescription drugs, got caught, lied about it, and made it go away. Then he has trashed junkies and other addicts on-air for being weak, weak-minded, foolish and other hateful things. So far I haven't seen Stern busted for something and then lying his pants off to hide the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. He used to have her on the show when she was "relevant"
I'd love to hear him get her back on the air to shred her, but even a dunce like her desperate for airtime is probably just smart enough to avoid that. I'm sure she thinks he's a "Jew devil" now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. Jackson makes me doubt evolution.
Natural selection should have killed off anyone this stupid ages ago.

NB: I'm at work, so I did not see the video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Man, someone should use that line on her when she makes an appearance
Knockout!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Thanks for completely misunderstanding evolution.
Omg - but I getthe point I think you are trying to say. She's a throwback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. I don't think sarcasm has to be scientifically accurate.
I liked Victoria Jackson on SNL. I had no idea how rock stupid she was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I know what you mean - it wasn't an act. She was playing herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. Fartman nails it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swampguana Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Victoria is a psycho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
48. Victoria Jackson just looks fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. Well, if she looks so "fucking stupid"...why give a shit about what she says?
Duh.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NICO9000 Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. Moron!
She keeps getting worse and worse every time she pops up. Kudos to Howard and Robin for telling the truth here. Comparing her to Fred Phelps is correct, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. Got to Say It --
I love Howard and respect the stuff he says seriously, like this bit. I think on balance he is a voice for good rather than evil. Haven't heard him since he went on satellite radio except for his Daily Show interview.

As far as his being a racist goes, he begged Robin to move to NYC because she was a friend and he had such a good interaction with her.
But when they looked for apartements together, all they saw was lousy places. He couldn't understand it, and then it hit him -- "is this because she's black"? He was genuinely shocked. The next morning, he called up the realtor and read them the riot act. They immediately started seeing better places. THAT means more to me than any stereotypes that he might play up on his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
56. How very brave of Howard to "take on" the likes of Victoria Jackson..
considering how tough a target she is..:eyes:

Howard Stern didn't give a flying fuck about Gays, politcs or anything

else until HE got in trouble with the FCC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC