LawrenceODonnell V OrlyTaitz OMG

[Poll_Blind]

Run time: 03:46 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVG772L1v_k   Posted on YouTube: April 28, 2011 By YouTube Member: terimccarthy Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: April 28, 2011 By DU Member: Poll_Blind Views on DU: 1608

 
SMACK!!!

PB

[doc03]

1. I thinks she is nuts n/t

[CelticThunder]

2. Why is Lawrence O'Donnell even giving this whackjob the time of day?

He's giving her the exposure she craves. Fuck him.

[Poll_Blind]

3. Hah hah hah hah hah! (HA!)

:rofl:

PB

[Mira]

4. Why be profane, it makes you look inarticulate ? She had this coming,

she's a combative idiot and her credibility is further damaged. I think it was appropriate and timely of Lawrence O'Donnell and a great feat to have her on.

[freshwest]

5. O'Donnell is great and there's no reason to abuse a fellow progressive.

[Mira]

11. That was my message, tool n/t

[Bucky]

6. The certfiicate says "born Aug 4" but was signed Aug 7th -- plenty of time to fly a baby from Texas

I mean Kenya ;)



You think I'm being silly, but just wait. Their next tactic will be to argue that the 3-4 day time lapse was when the international plot to put a British national in the White House sprung into action to smuggle Baby Obama into Hawaii. Given their grasp of world realities, I next expect them to argue that they selected Hawaii because that was the place closest to Kenya.

[immoderate]

7. I think he could have played it better.

She was introducing the SS# scam. IIRC, it's been debunked and LO should know that. Letting her talk a little would highlight her desperation. Then he could decimate her.

--imm

[Poll_Blind]

9. I think he expected that she would at least acknowledge what had happened with the...

...birth certificate- but it's like she's in a trance, moved onto the next zombie thing she's going to be a zombie about.

PB

[Warren DeMontague]

13. No way. He handled it perfectly.

She just wanted to jabber on about something else. So now she's not obligated to answer for all her previous crap? Why should anyone have to listen to her NEW bullshit theory, if she can't even apologize for the last one?

Fuck that. She's had enough free air time.

[romantico]

14. I would agree

I would agree,however have you ever heard this woman in an interview? She would have taken 15 minutes answering his question. People like this when asked a simple question first have to make some sort of useless point before answering a question. Lawrence had not time or patience. She agreed prior to the interview that she would address the birth certificate and instead,once the camera was rolling live she wanted to introduce some other document before answering his question. Lawrence I think would have allowed her to talk about it but first he wanted a simple answer to the question she had promised to answer before the interview.

[immoderate]

16. Makes sense.

--imm :)

[smuglysmiling]

8. That Oily Taints a slick one...

[geckosfeet]

10. Poor Oily. Vhat a looser.

[flamingdem]

12. too cool i missed it

radioactive!

[LBJDemocrat]

15. I hate to say it

But this is no way to conduct an interview. This is intellectual junk food, FOX News style.

[Bucky]

17. Agreed. It'd be harmless to let her say her distractions and then repeat "NOW answer my question!"

Just shouting her down makes it looks like the host is afraid of her lies. If you let the truth shut up liars, you don't have to cut their mics (a la O'Reilly).