Pharaoh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-11 09:04 AM
Original message |
|
Run time: 02:03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1clRcxZS52s
Posted on YouTube: January 05, 2010
By YouTube Member: GOODMagazine
Views on YouTube: 64117
Posted on DU: July 12, 2011
By DU Member: Pharaoh
Views on DU: 824 | Cool Idea!
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Why the hell would we use this in cities, as the video suggests? |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 09:13 AM by robcon
Use land that is cheaper and less occupied, and more amenable to farming.
If this technique increases the yields per acre or per farmer, it will work (as long as it doesn't cost excessive amount to build the vertical farms.) It is idiotic to bring farming to the highest-value land in the country.
Currently 2% of the people in the U.S. feed the other 98%, and they export to many countries (and less than 2% of Americans are full-time farmers.) If this technique works on farms to increase yields, it has great promise. But putting farms in valuable densely populated cities is nonsense, IMO.
|
Pharaoh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Because thats where the people are and |
|
transport costs will be very expensive in the future. Let alone a tractor plowing a field.
No doubt they should be federally subsidized and owned by the city's and not corporations. Time to take back food production from Monsanto.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Transport costs??? Do you know what it costs to run/load/unload a truck in Manhattan? |
|
Off the charts idiotic idea, IMO.
If vertical farming works... use it on farms.
|
WatsonT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Using unoccupied blocks in cities |
|
for this purpose and leasing out the lots as community or individual gardens would make some sense. People would pay a premium for that and it doesn't necessarily have to be economical in the long run.
I could see it working in that way.
But as an alternative to regular agriculture? No, it doesn't make sense.
Far better to push cities in to smaller and smaller footprints, increasing the density of housing/industry/commercial buildings and leaving more land undeveloped for farming.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Use it on unoccupied farmland. Smarter idea, IMO. |
WatsonT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
farm land is cheap. Building the infrastructure to maintain this sort of thing wouldn't be.
You could double your yields but if you do so by quadrupling your costs it's not a good idea.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Then you've defined vertical farming as a bad idea. |
|
It's obvious that the cost of urban land/harvesting/getting rid of chaff/silos/barns/trucking, etc. would be WAY higher than using farm land.
Why would you plant crops in a high-rent area? Wouldn't that, by definition, raise the costs of production (aside from the off-the-charts costs of creating a 'building' strong enough to hold the weight of dirt, fertilizer, harvesting machines, etc.?)
|
izquierdista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Oh, just one thing.... |
|
Where does the light come from?
It's obvious that this city dweller has no idea at all how dependent crops are on the amount of daily sunshine they get. Yes, there is a certain amount of yield enhancement you can get by training certain crops to grow vertically instead of spreading out, but the optimum for that is a lot shorter than 5 stories.
|
drokhole
(759 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I want to live in this one... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |