Ed Schultz Rips O'Reilly Lying To Viewers On Rupertgate

[Grassy Knoll]

Run time: 01:41 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K6bZ8wl1cs   Posted on YouTube: July 21, 2011 By YouTube Member: NewsPoliticsInfo Views on YouTube: 34   Posted on DU: July 22, 2011 By DU Member: Grassy Knoll Views on DU: 2082

 

[Grassy Knoll]

1. Fox New's 911, and Katrina rolled into ONE......

LOL, People can no longer trust fox news, Beyond damage control.

[physioex]

2. Hold it now.....

Isn't Rupert an American citizen? :rofl:

[tsuki]

4. I haven't seen his citizenship papers, and I mean, the looooong form. nt

[JDPriestly]

6. Yes. Rupert is an American citizen.

He became a citizen so that he could continue to own his American TV media.

[Divine Discontent]

3. off to the greatest... only fools watch Faux and believe what they're told

[tsuki]

5. Front page, front page, front page, you mean like the ACORN story where

you pimped the pimp.

[underpants]

9. and Judith Miller's above the fold "leaks" in the run up to war

which the administration quoted on Sunday morning talk shows.

The war on Iraq would not have been possible without the NY Times.

[ScottLand]

7. I always chuckle at the way BO talks about "the folks".

I'm guessing they drop by his office to tell him what they're thinking.

[Enthusiast]

8. Nice one, Ed! K&R! nt

[A Physicist]

10. Now Ed is using Fox tactics?

In case anybody didn’t notice, Ed is being somewhat misleading here. If someone is an American citizen and they are employed by News of the World in Britain, is this person an “American” employee or “British” employee? I think this person is a British employee that happens to be a foreign national.

O’Liely is misleading by attempting to imply that American divisions of News Corp are not under suspicion of violating American laws and this is not true. Ed did not need to mislead to prove O’Liely was misleading. Just do a little more research and tell the truth straight-up.

O’Liely mislead the audience by failing to point out that News Corp divisions (on-shore/off-shore, it does not matter) are suspected of violating the electronic privacy of 9/11 survivors. This would fall under American jurisdiction for survivors residing in the U.S. no matter where the electronic invasion originated from.

Ed misleads the audience by equivocating on the definition of “American” employee in the example he cites.

The TRUTH is on our side and Ed should learn how to use it.


http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43838718/ns/us_news-life/

[JAnthony]

11. I still love Ed Schultz, even if he's on at a time when I'm sleeping!

He should be on at 6 PM ...now that MSNBC has fired Cenk Uygur!

[KansDem]

12. Do it live, Bill!

Bill O'Reilly
Stewie Griffin

:rofl: