me not liking the Likud Party's running of Israel is not anti semitism
Not a good start for you. I have been doing this for a long time, don't think your strawman BS is going to deter me, nor are your false allegations. I didn't say your dislike of Likud was anti-Semitic. Want to know why? There are two reasons: one -- disliking a political party in Israel is not anti-Semitic, unless it is because they are Jews, so I would not say someone was anti-Semitic for disliking any Israeli political party; and two -- this is the FIRST post you have even mentioned Likud! Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining and don't try to deflect legitimate rebuttal to your ill-formed opinions and "facts" by accusing me of calling you or implying you are an anti-Semite for something I don't even find anti-Semitic.
1. as for is Jewish or arab a race in France people from North Africa are considered a separate racial group than people from central and southern africa, there is even the word maghrebian to describe them. in your earlier post you pointed out that arabs were not a race and didnt say anything about Jewish people so i thought you were implying that they were a race.
There is a reason they are considered a different racial group; one group is
caucasoid (Arabs) and the other is
negroid (Black Africans). Arabs
are an
ethnic group, but not a separate racial group. Here's something that will really blow your mind: some Jews and Arabs are part of the
same ethnic group! Zounds! OMG! For real?! Yes, for really and truly! They are known as
Semites or the Semitic people. As for your inference, since you are having enough difficulty with what I actually write, save your "skills" and don't waste my time with trying to look for "implications."
2. you did imply that europe did it alone when you said "they did it" saying they did it usually implies that it was them and not some other group.
Once again, don't try to second guess me, stick with what I have actually written. I didn't say they were responsible "alone" nor did I imply it. This is the
second time I have said this! You clearly have
no clue so I am going to use an analogy and perhaps
that will help your misunderstanding.
Three men break into a bank and rob the place. You happen to know one of the men. An article appears at DU and you state: "Well, Trevor is a friend and I know he had a hard life." I respond with: "I don't care what Trevor's life was like, what he did was wrong!"
See what happened there?! I
didn't mention the other two because they weren't brought up in your post! But, by commenting only on Trevor's actions
doesn't mean I don't think the other two weren't involved or am claiming Trevor was the
only (did it alone) one involved. You brought Europe's attitude toward Israel, I addressed that issue specifically. It isn't my fault you read something into it, nor, after two explanations, you can't seem to understand it wasn't
only Europe involved.
3. you do not even refute my assertion that many people in gaza are refugees and their descendants
Why would I? I already know this and I know how it happened. What is wrong on your part is that they were not collected, like the Jews of Poland, and dumped there. Some may have been forced out of what is now Israel, others fled; happens in war. Here's something I bet you didn't know, 1000's of Jews were removed or forced out of Gaza at the same time making them
refugees. Also, here's something for you to ponder: why are there Palestinians living in refugee camps in an area
controlled by Palestinians? Also, dwell on this: why are
descendants (meaning they were born in Gaza) even considered refugees?
4. so you support the idea that palestinians have no right to enter sovereign Israel but Israelis can not only enter Palestine but colonize parts of it (west bank, plus there are Israeli settlements (not colonies i know, just settlements) in Gaza as well as roads that only Israelis can use.
I have already said don't try to read into what I say, you aren't very adept at it, but I am going to add: don't dare speak for me! Yes, Palestinians have
no right to enter Israel without Israel's permission. I also said Israelis are going to enter areas controlled by Israel, it is the nature of the beast, but I said
nothing about "colonizing" (your continued word of choice) areas in the occupied regions. I will repeat...
there are NO Israeli settlements in Gaza! They were dismantled in 2005.
this is from the BBC Gaza, one of the most densely populated tracts of land in the world, is home to 1,178,000 Palestinians, 33% of whom live in United Nations-funded refugee camps. Gaza is also home to 6,900 Jewish settlers.
Israeli-controlled areas and settlements take up about 40% of Gaza’s land. Israel controls all external borders, crossing points and major roads in Gaza.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/world/...You may want to try again. Your link: (
http://news.bbc.co.uk/ hi/english/ static/in_depth/ world/
2001 /israel_and_palestinians /key_maps /2. stm). It is 2011! Here's some lovely information from the BBC from 2005...
Settlers protest at Gaza pullout and
31 August 2011 Last updated at 05:57 ET
Israel profile
Israel evacuated its settlers from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and withdrew its forces, ending almost four decades of military occupation. However, after the militant Islamic group Hamas seized control of Gaza in June 2007, Israel intensified its economic blockade of the Strip. At the end of 2008 it launched a major military assault on Gaza to halt cross-border rocket attacks.
source BBC 5. of course a blockade cripples the economy, look at what us sanctions did to the economies of cuba and iraq and those were not all out blockades we still let others trade with them if they want to which is why i have been able to drink cuban orange juice since i moved to france.
It doesn't always, but it does but a damper in it. Gaza and the West Bank also have trading partners and is not subject to full-on economic blockade (switching those goalposts again).
6. the difference in size between gaza and the warsaw ghetto is not what is important, it is the displacing of people from their homes to the area which is, and despite what you claim many people in gaza were forced from other lands to there, some by the government of Israel, some by the government of Egypt.
The size
is important since
you are the one claiming similarities between the two. It is just ONE of MANY differences between the two, but I am not at all surprised you are now backing away from one of the differences as it further weakens your absurd and vile comparison. A second reminder: don't speak for me! I
never said some in Gaza weren't forced from their homes, I
said they weren't gathered up (you know, like the Warsaw Ghetto and all those Polish Jews) and deposited there!
7. from what the bbc says israel controls all the external borders of Gaza, that there are Jewish settlements within Gaza, that there are Israeli controlled roads in Gaza and to let you know you get one border check when you arrive in the Schengen Zone (not all EU nations and some nations from outside the EU) then you cross between nations like crossing between states in the USA, there is a sign and no stop or border guard or anything.
Well, I have already disproved this nonsense and you have kindly demonstrated just how little you actually know about the situation. As for the Schengen Zone, one still
has to have and show and EU card or passport!
Entry conditions for third-country nationals
A Schengen visa or a visa exemption does not, in and of itself, entitle a traveler to enter the Schengen Area. The Schengen Borders Code lists requirements which third-country nationals must meet to be allowed into the Schengen Area. For this purpose, a third-country national is a person who does not enjoy the Community right of free movement (i.e. a person who is not an EU, EEA or Swiss citizen, or a family member of such a person who is in possession of a residence permit with the indication "family member of an EU citizen" or "family member of an EEA or CH citizen").
The requirements for entry are as follows:<78>
The third-country national is in possession of a valid travel document or documents authorising them to cross the border; the acceptance of travel documents for this purpose remains within the domain of the member states;<79>
The traveler either possesses a valid visa (if required) or a valid residence permit;
The traveler can justify the purpose and conditions of the intended stay and has sufficient means of subsistence, both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to his or her country of origin or transit to a third country into which the traveler is certain to be admitted, or is in a position to acquire such means lawfully;
The Schengen Information System does not contain an alert for refusal of entry concerning the traveler, and
The traveler is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of any of the Schengen states.
Border guards are required to stamp the travel documents of third-country nationals when they cross external borders at all times, even in extraordinary and unforeseen circumstances, including when checks are relaxed. However, nationals of Andorra, Monaco and San Marino are exempt from this requirement, as are heads of state, whose visit what announced through diplomatic channels, and those enjoying the benefit of a local border traffic regime. Certain exemptions also apply to the crews of ships and aircraft.<[br />
Schengen AreaHow about that! There are still rules for passage through the area. Other places have not established such rules, including the Middle East, so I am not sure why you are trying so hard to act as if that should be (or is) the norm; if that is what you are doing.
8. Hamas can be interpreted in more than one way, violent destruction of Israel or the creation of a new nation, like switzerland, with Palestinian muslim cantons and Israeli jewish cantons (which is an idea i suggested before that you didnt even comment about.
Either way is the destruction of modern day Israel. Are you advocating for such a move? I didn't comment on your "suggestion" because I thought it was stupid. Now you know.
9. you suggest that gaza voting for hamas played no role in the extremist Likud party deciding to bomb them?
Hamas was voted in 2006, from the time of disengagement (2005) to 2006, some 2000 rockets were launched into Israel. This resulted in Israel attacking Gaza. When Hamas overthrew Fatah in Gaza, a maritime blockade was enacted and MORE rockets landed in Israel, and Israel responded. So no, voting in Hamas was not the reason for attacks on Gaza. Learn the history of the area and you might not make such ignorant remarks.
10. i meant to say that the books are edited by israel, the schoolbooks the kids get in palestinian schools in Jerusalem, which sometimes have blanks as opposed to what the kids get in Palestinian schools in gaza and the west bank. there was an exposé on this on france culture this week
You mean the Israeli Education Ministry controls its textbooks? Shocker! :eyes: I really doubt there are blank pages, but I would love to see this "exposé" of which you speak. Is there a link? While you are looking for it, look for the editing the Palestinians do to
their school textbooks, including to referring to Jews as "pigs and apes" and not showing Israel on
any maps, only "Palestine" where Israel should be.
11. like i said there are just settlements, not colonies in gaza, which must be a huge consolation for the people of gaza.
And, like I said, get more recent information.
my wreched propaganda???
false information????
half truths????
Yup! See above.
biggoted points???? like i said i thought that you implied the "jewish race" when you said before when, i compared gaza to warsaw, and i spoke of people acting as inferior and superior races and you said "arabs are not a race" yet didnt say the same for jewish people i thought it was implied that you considered jewish people to make up a race.
Well, I have already addressed your "implication" conclusions: don't do it. You aren't very good at it.
I also never said that Jews were like Nazis, never, I was comparing the Likud Party run government of Israel with the Nazi Party run government of Germany.
If you say so. However, I find it interesting you NEVER mentioned the Likud until the post to which I am responding but you
did mention Jews several times.
I am always up to continue talking and you dont have to worry about any vile anti semitism because I hold no grudge against any religion. I myself have no religion but think that all people on this planet should be free to have whatever religion they wish.
You do understand what anti-Semitism is, right? Just because you don't
think your not spewing anti-Semitism, doesn't mean you aren't.