Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Obama Winning So Many States??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:18 PM
Original message
Why is Obama Winning So Many States??
 
Run time: 06:51
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7usHouAgrs
 
Posted on YouTube: February 13, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: February 13, 2008
By DU Member: aaronbees
Views on DU: 1095
 
Interesting analysis from Cenk Uygur at The Young Turks, breaking down cost expenditures of the Obama and Clinton campaigns. Boils down to Clinton taking the establishment strategy and Obama taking the 50-state strategy route.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love the Young Turks.
and I have to say, that watching this whole campaign season unfold on Brave New Films' site with Cenk, Robert Greenwald et al, has been an absolute blast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good, interesting analysis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonnenschein Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. strategy
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 10:50 PM by Sonnenschein
Have some good speech writers would be good for Hillary. Also her campaign has been too soft on Obama by allowing their words to be twisted again and again. Her campaign did not address why people like her or dislike her. People like her partly because of Bill. So she should emphasize Bill's accomplishment (Obama's Reagan comment gave her a good chance but her campaign did not cease it. When Obama accuse her of being divisive, she should have went on attack and wear her "divisiveness" not as a baggage, but as a badge of honor. She put herself on the line on our behalf. If she just smiled like Laura, she would not have attracted so much hatred from the right wing. She should have shamed Obama for implying that she is one of "the same old folks in Washington" who sit on status quo when Obama knows full well of the sweeping changes Clintons brought to Washington. She should emphasize on every stump speech that she has always proven that she can work with Republicans while Obama only hopes to. The fact that she won reelection with overwhelming majority in NY shows that Republican can vote for her if they get to know her. She should emphasis time and time ago that she voted for using force wisely and as a last resort as she said while casting her vote. She should emphasize that nobody would believe that we would be at war if Clintons were in the White House.

But so far she has run a bad and soft campaign, so she deserves to loose. Consultants are not substitutes for common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This really is a watershed moment.
I don't know where Obama will take us. I'm a little scared about that. But I know where the DLC types have taken us and it isn't good.

Howard Dean was right. Obama was right.

When you base your whole worldview on a faulty premise (the establishment way of thinking about these elections, for example) you can never really win.

It has been a long time coming, but I'm beginning to believe that the generation of Democrats as Junior Republicans is coming to an end, and the abruptness of this change is really staggering.

I am so proud of the young people supporting Obama. I'm mid-50s. My generation has really given you a raw deal. We have screwed up everything with our narcissistic self-gratification and endless consumption. The world we are turning over to you really sucks in a lot of ways. This is the first real chance you have had to take matters into your own hands. Time for a new generation of leaders.

The outgoing generation doesn't deserve any more chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Problems with your analysis and suggestions.
Part of the reason Hillary is having her problems is that she and Bill went negative on Obama going into South Carolina. This really aggravated African Americans and swung them firmly away from Hillary, and MANY Dems, regardless of race or other such factors, also became pretty darn upset with Bill. It is VERY risky for Hillary to go negative at this point because it makes her look desperate and reinforces the very negative feelings that so many people already have about her. If she goes on and on talking about how great things were during Bill's years as Prez, she reminds everyone about the past and that she is fixture of the past at a time when people want change for the FUTURE. It also reinforces how many people feel that she is running as a sort of co-President on Bill's coattails. That is a bigtime turn-off. The only hope Hillary has now that Obama has so much momentum is to stay POSITIVE and tout her experience, her goals for the FUTURE (especially economic goals), and to try to be fresh and uplifting. She needs to try to secure her ever-eroding base among women, Latinos, older voters, and working class voters.
But that's an uphill climb with Obama having more money and momentum, because as her base gets to know him better, they like him and feel evermore comfortable with him. (In Virginia today he cut into her base of support BIGTIME.) What Obama needs to do is to firm up his base of men, younger voters, Africqan Americans, more affluent Dems, and independents who can vote in Dem primaries, and continue to cut into her base. He needs to do this by focusing specifically on his economic and healthcare plans in a populist way. But he also needs to mix in that inspiring rhetoric and language because this election is not just about a resume'. It is also about vision, inspiration, and a hunger to believe in a new leader again. (Much like the JFK and RFK days.) This also is where Hillary so sorely lacks. Not sure if she can overcome it. I caucused for Obama in Maine where he blew her away. If she is able to turn it around and get nominated, I'll support her. She's very smart and capable. But Obama is far more inspiring, and he does not have the negative baggage which Hillary has that scares the crap out of me going into the general election. The R's are hoping like hell that she wins because they WANT her to rally their base, and she WOULD. Not good ! We need a winner. Obama does better in the general election. WE MUST WIN !!! So I say GO OBAMA !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonnenschein Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. negative
Bill did the right thing for attacking Obama. But it was a mistake to retreat and allow the Obama surrogates to twist his words and also Hillary's comments about King. They said nothing wrong. People who twisted their words are the real racists. It's the same thing like Kerry allowed the swiftboating by not responding to it forcefully.

It must be embarrassing for Clintons to lose to a new kid on the block who stole a few pages from Clintons playbook (hope and change), a few pages from Kennedy's (empty rhetoric), a few pages from Reagan (blind optimisms) and few pages from Karl Rove (twisting and twisting). Obama is a very talented politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ridiculous
"Empty rhetoric" and "blind optimism"? I guess that's better than baseless opinions.

At any rate, the most absurd charge against Obama is that there is no substance behind his words, as I already explained here: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/ihavenobias/3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonnenschein Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Change is about experience
Change is not about future. Can anybody turn around a losing company by appointing an unexperienced CEO? It's amazing that people actually buy Obama's rethoric. Clintons already proved they can change and they can work with Republicans while Obama only hopes to. People don't dislike the idea of co-presidency. Who does not want to buy one get one free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Work with? Don't you mean cave in?
I'd be glad to vote for Hillary,.....If I had some UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE that I got promised 16 years ago.

No tickee, no votee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Great post.
You hit the nail on the head. Hillary had multiple opportunities to take down Barack Obama, and yet never used them. I don't know why. But I will say that I'm glad her weakness as a campaigner was exposed before the general election. We need someone who knows how to campaign, and Hillary has shown she doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yet another reason to back Obama
Cuz it makes Howard Dean look good, and it make Rahm and the DLC look like idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Yep, I sure am tired....
of the anti-50 states mentality. I think the Young Turks analysis here is spot on.

And here's to you, Howard Dean. :D He's a big reason we're finding new Democratic voters this year, I do believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. "50-State Strategy", Baby!
Seems to me that the Obama campaign really took this strategy to heart - and the Clinton campaign has only paid it lip service. That's why last Tuesday, I voted for Obama in the NY primary.

:kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fascinating information...
the Young Turks are awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because the people are voting for him
I went to the Obama rally in St Louis

He's great speaker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasonkrueger Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's mainly due to his opposition to the Iraq war
Obama and Clinton are pretty much the same candidate if you substract her Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. That's funny..I don't think they'd
be the same candidate at all..but the War On Iraq was huge and started me and a lot of others here in New York wishing we had never heard of hilary clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonnenschein Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. War
That's why she should emphasis time and time ago that she voted for using force wisely and as a last resort as she said while casting her vote. She should emphasize that nobody would believe that we would be at war if Clintons were in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. He's a smooth talking politician. He can talk the talk but can he walk the walk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Do you mean
can he vote the right way on the Kyle Lieberman amendment (to help ensure Bush doesn't start a war with Iran)? Or do you mean can he vote the right way on awful bankruptcy bills that hurt the average person? Or do you mean can he push for campaign finance reform?

Oh wait I forgot, he already did *all three* in the Senate. Remind me, which other presidential candidate can claim these three (critical) things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yes but how many Senate votes did he get on his side? Will he be able to bring onboard
the DLC dems and Neo-Con repugs? Or will the Senate and House all of a sudden find the votes to overturn the pres vetos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Considering the amazingly broad demographic he's currently appealing to
I'd say his claim that he'll bring the government together shouldn't be called into question, at least not at this point. He should be an incredibly popular, and therefore powerful president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC