Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Vicky Toesuck admitted that she was WRONG?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 09:03 AM
Original message
Has Vicky Toesuck admitted that she was WRONG?
"But in two memos—and in a document entitled, “Unclassified Summary of Valerie Wilson’s CIA Empoyment and Cover History”— Fitzgerald attempts to shoot down the idea that the agent's job was mostly analysis.

“It was clear from very early in the investigation that Ms. Wilson qualified under the relevant statute”—the Intelligence Identities act— “as a covert agent whose identity had been disclosed by public officials, including Mr. Libby, to the press,” Fitzgerald wrote in a sentencing memorandum filed late last Friday night.

A spokeswoman for Libby’s defense team declined to comment, saying his lawyers will address the issue when they file their own sentencing memorandum with Judge Walton in the next few days.

In the “unclassified summary” of his memom which was based on information cleared by the CIA and became publicly available Tuesday, Fitzgerald provided new details about Wilson’s previously classified activities at the agency. In January, 2002, she was working for the agency “as an operations officer” in the Directorate of Operations’s Counterproliferation Division (CPD) and serving as “chief” of a unit with responsibility for weapons proliferation issues related to Iraq. In that capacity, he added, she traveled overseas in an undercover capacity.

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries,” the document states. “When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity….At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employe for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18927332/site/newsweek/page/2/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. None of this bunch is EVER wrong about ANYTHING!!!!
They "misspeak." Then they "can't recall." However, they are never, ever wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't it be lovely if they got her for perjury? She did lie in sworn testimony. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. She will lay low for a while, then be back up spewing the same crap...
Her defense will be "Well, I really didn't have any way of knowing that she was covert. That was just my opinion!" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Victoria Toensing doesn't have the grace to admit she's wrong
In the meantime, it's hard for me to believe that Patrick Fitzgerald didn't chuckle very quietly to himself if and when he heard about her testimony that Ms. Plame was NOT covert, and Ms. Toensing knew better than the head of the CIA...

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. For as much as I'd like to see Rep. Conyers call her sorry little ass
back up before the Judiciary Committee I don't think he'll do it.

What I would love to see (and it doesn't just pertain to Ms. Toesing) is to see a nice little defamation of character lawsuit slapped against her. I'd rather see her have to pay the Wilson's a couple of million judgement (in addition to the couple of million in legal fees) than to have a few days of having to say I was wrong in front of the media cameras and that is that.

I want them to pay where it hurts the most, in their dear little pocket books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'd love to see Joe & Vicky pay
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC