Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Reilly blames the "indigenous population of Iraq" for not trying to have a free society

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:04 AM
Original message
O'Reilly blames the "indigenous population of Iraq" for not trying to have a free society

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/05/mccain_tells_or.html#more

<snip>

O'Reilly: "I was wrong. I supported the war, I thought it would go um the way of Afghanistan and Kuwait after the First Gulf War, that is that the indigenous population of Iraq would cooperate with the United States in trying to have a free society, they have not. That is the crux of the failure in Iraq, am I wrong?

McCain: "You're right as to what happened, but you are wrong in this respect;

we were welcomed as liberators. They wanted to get rid of this terrible guy and his incredible satanical sadistic sons, and the kind of regime they lived under. What happened was that we didn't do what we did in Bosnia, we didn't do what we did in Kosovo, we didn't do what we should have done in Rwanda, and that was that we didn't have enough troops on the ground to enforce an order.

"We allowed the looting to start with, we never had enough troops there. It's been well chronicled in Fiasco, in Cobra Two and other books the way the war was mismanaged. But I think it was because the mismanagement of the war, I think if we'd have done the right thing, you would see a peaceful Iraq today like you see a peaceful other places where we've gone in to, to try to bring in a, a democracy and a free society."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does he mean the citizens of a sovereign nation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. "free society" meaning the society we think they should have - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, BillyO, when do we set up the reservations?
Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush-Cheney don't give a f*** about democracy.
That's the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. they want to give Iraqis same kind Bush Cheney want here--
enough of the appearance of democracy to prevent a revolution, but not so much that people can actually change major policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's right if by free he means
giving away their country for free to oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. More Wife Beatings From The Master
Actually he could have said the truth..."Why is MY oil under their sand"...and he'd be saying the same thing.

Now wasn't BillO supposed to eat crow about no WMDs? I know, I know...he never had credibility, never will. But then that's what makes the Big Head such fun to kick around.

Now when someone says the GOOP doesn't have an exit strategy, now you have it. All failures in Iraq were because of those ingrateful Iraqis and us dirty fuckin' hippies. Keep spinning into irrelevance, BillO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. You were wrong, and half a million innocent people are dead
Edited on Wed May-30-07 11:13 AM by wtmusic
now be a good little Samurai....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. What all these
"tools" can't seem to get is that they (the Iraqi) have NO interest in living or being like Americans. They have their OWN culture and their OWN way of living and doing things, they want to be free to do that WITHOUT the US sticking their collective big nose in their business and telling them how they should or should not be. I am sure that they are grateful to be rid of Saddam, I also suspect that they (Iraqi) will be glad to be rid of the US occupying forces even more than being rid of Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Agreed. Cultural arrogance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. And it was our role to overthrow Saddam because.......???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wait a minute...
Who was in charge when we were dealing with Bosnia and Kosovo? Oh, that's right... Bill Clinton. So basically, if only Georgie-poo had been as smart as Clinton Iraq would be a free society?

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I noticed that too... he is spinning out of control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. "...go um the way of Afghanistan and Kuwait..."
Kuwait? Oh, yeah, I remember how the ruling family in Kuwait relinquished all power and turned the country into a western democracy. That happened...when?

And it is going the way of Afghanistan. In another couple years there won't be any effective central government and the various regions will be controlled by opposing factions and warlords.

He might have picked better examples of success, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Things are going swimmingly in Afghanistan, aren't they?
The Taliban were just doing some sport shooting when they accidentally shot down that Chinook the other day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. So if McCain says we didn't do things right in Iraq, why did he spend the last 4 years defending it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Indigenous population?
Does he think they're animals?

That wording sounds more like "Wild Kingdom" than a news program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. ? Humans are animals, and indigenous is a perfect word to describe some cultures.
Indigenous Cultures

The future of our planet depends on saving both the remaining biologically diverse ecosystems and the cultural, credible diversity of the tribal peoples of the world. The ancient cultures of native peoples, threatened by modern assimilation, are the only known, proven time-tested models for the sustainable consumption of the Earth’s threatened natural resources.

Native Planet hopes that you enjoy our cultural documentaries that will show you the fascinating world of indigenous peoples and their unique cultures—and why the preservation of their tribal lifeways is essential to a world where life is sustainable and both cultural diversity and biological diversity flourish.
http://www.nativeplanet.org/indigenous/indigenous.shtml


There's more than enough good reason to harshly criticize O'Reilly. His use of "indigenous" isn't one. (Unless he meant to describe suburban Iraqis who, last I checked, had achieved more doctorates than any other country on earth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I just so rarely see it used to describe modern humans and their
cities/trappings, etc.

I know that, technically, it's correct. I just wouldn't have used that wording.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. That's because most Homo Sapiens Sapiens (modern humans) on the planet
are unfortunately now part of our globalized consumer culture(civilization) with all its cities/trappings. ;)

If O'Reilly meant "all people who were born and remain anywhere in Iraq", he made yet another ignorant asshole blunder.
There goes his next Peabody Award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. It's legitimate
Edited on Wed May-30-07 12:12 PM by dave_p
"Born therein", native - but it's a very weird use for the population of an invaded country: of course they're indigenous, their country was invaded. "Population" would be more appropriate. International law sometimes uses "protected population" (because the occupier's responsible for their wellbeing): I think we can see why that might not spring to mind in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Exactly. I think population or native population would have
just SOUNDED more appropriate. That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes indeed
Edited on Thu May-31-07 09:23 AM by dave_p
... and I hope nobody thought I was suggesting his inane comments were legitimate, just that word, in a why-the-fuck-would-anybody-use-that-word kinda way.

I think he just wanted a big word to put in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC