|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 12:56 PM Original message |
Chimpy has the third lowest IQ of any president, Clinton fourth highest, according to study (mydd) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. Should put "R" and "D" next to 'em, so we can eyeball their centers of mass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. My first thought - we usually think Democrats are more intelligent than Republics. Wonder if it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. kennedy was higher than Bill Clinton - who'd of thunk it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. 129 at the minimum end is too high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. 105 on a Good Day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. False. It's been debunked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. And it's a favorite topic of RWers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Right. Here's the true order. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Woot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libby2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoleil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. That was a different study. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmokingJacket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
29. Actually, it refers to a real journal article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweet Freedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm pretty sure this is a hoax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Of course it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. See my post above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. snopes blocked at work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweet Freedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
44. Yeah, I'm surprised, but all the hoax sites are blocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Riiiight. If Chimpolini is above 90 I'll...well, I'll do something really unexpected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. This is horse pucky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. I wonder which current Democratic candidate is the "smartest." --Likely Edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. To paraphrase former Senator Hruska... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. Bush Jr. is no more than 100 - 105 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. NO! That's 3rd lowest IQ in the Dumb Turnip competition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theoldman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
18. A bunch of crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
19. Been debunked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. I doubt the accuracy of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
24. why would anyone doubt that, he has displayed his low IQ a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. What they're doubting is that his actual intelligence quotient is anywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. That's not really fair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
27. Bush's I.Q. is off the charts -- much higher than anyone else's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
30. I'm not as concerned with Bush's IQ as I am with his lack of knowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Exactly! I forget the Professor's name at SDSU but he conducted a detailed study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. The article was, indeed, published--snopes notwithstanding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. You can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
33. W has the same IQ that I do? That can't be fuckling right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
35. Convoluted Methodology? You're Not Kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StudentsMustUniteNow (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
36. Reagan was an imbecile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Yeah, but at least there was SOME strange genuine warmth underneath all that fluff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StudentsMustUniteNow (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Very true n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
39. Bush's IQ is not that high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
41. How does anyone (even *) get ranked lower than Ronald Reagan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
42. Bush 129-139? No way in hell. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-30-07 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
43. Oh please, knock off about 20 points on all those. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC