Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Soldiers With Missing Limbs Allowed To Return To Active Duty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 01:15 PM
Original message
U.S. Soldiers With Missing Limbs Allowed To Return To Active Duty
U.S. Soldiers With Missing Limbs Allowed To Return To Active Duty

SAN ANTONIO -- In the blur of smoke and blood after a bomb blew up under his Humvee in Iraq, Sgt. Tawan Williamson looked down at his shredded leg and knew it couldn't be saved. His military career, though, pulled through.

Less than a year after the attack, Williams is running again with a high-tech prosthetic leg and plans to take up a new assignment, probably by the fall, as an Army job counselor and affirmative action officer in Okinawa, Japan.

In an about-face by the Pentagon, the military is putting many more amputees back on active duty -- even back into combat, in some cases.

Williamson, a 30-year-old Chicago native who is missing his left leg below the knee and three toes on the other foot, acknowledged that some will be skeptical of a maimed soldier back in uniform.

"But I let my job show for itself," he said. "At this point, I'm done proving. I just get out there and do it."

Previously, a soldier who lost a limb almost automatically received a quick discharge, a disability check and an appointment with the Veterans Administration.

http://www.local6.com/spotlight/13413279/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus! Some people never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. When it is the only way you can draw a paycheck
you do what you have to do.

If he didn't go back, they would have declared his injury a "pre-existing condition", kicked him out of the military and demanded he pay back his enlistment bonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or maybe malingering. Faking a missing limb.
Reminiscent of the Civil War. Lots of one-armed and one-legged officers kept serving. The question that crossed my mind in the current case, though, was whether they are being REQUIRED to stay on duty as long as they can perform some function. Then the image leaped to mind of a quad-amputee aircraft mechanic lying under a plane on a gurney and turning a wrench with his teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I wish I could dismiss that as
sarcasm. I really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. They WANT to. I volunteer at Bethesda Naval and donate platelets at WRAMC....
many have survivor guilt and others take seriously their duty to their colleagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. amputees have been
allowed to remain in the military if not earlier...since the 60's. I've known several. If they can fulfill the physical requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly, this is nothing new. In fact, historically, it's pretty common.
Many a general in the civil war and first world wars were amputees. Not sure about WWII but I wouldn't be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think some of them are trying
to justify their loss in their own minds. By going back they are in effect saying it was worth the loss of limb and they would do it again. That it was for that noble cause that * speaks of. Either that or they suffered some kind of brain injury at the same time.



:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC