Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHO'S MORE CRAZY? Kuchinich, For Taking On The Most Powerful Men In D.C. Or His Fellow Democrats?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 04:42 PM
Original message
WHO'S MORE CRAZY? Kuchinich, For Taking On The Most Powerful Men In D.C. Or His Fellow Democrats?
Edited on Wed May-30-07 04:48 PM by kpete
Un-Cheney Melody
Who's More Crazy? Dennis Kucinich, For Taking On The Most Powerful Men In Washington? Or His Fellow Democrats, For Not Supporting Him?
By Dan Harkins



KUCINICH - As a young peacenik. In the press toward the 2006 congressional elections, Democratic contenders couldn't talk enough about impeachable offenses committed by the Bush administration in the holy pursuit of oil and influence. The lies. The wire-tapping. The torture. Impeachment hearings, goddamnit! Oversight!

But look at them now. These days, with the White House within reach (two out of three ain't bad!) and a majority of Americans shooting the collective finger at the Bush camp, those same Democrats have once again let honorary chairman of his own Department of Peace, Cleveland Congressman Dennis Kucinich, carry the heaviest load.

All of them still decry the deception and the perils of unnecessary war, and yet they're angling this week to approve another $96 billion in war funding for a war that's cost more than 3,400 American and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, not to mention the $429 billion in tax dollars that could have instituted universal health care. Bush just vetoed a war spending bill with a timeline for withdrawal. Now, he's set to concede to benchmarks instead, one of which is a provision to privatize Iraq's oil supply. Sigh.

...................

"We've spent a lot of time talking about Iraq here tonight and America's role in the world," he declared. "This country was taken into war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction and al Qaeda's role with respect to Iraq, which there wasn't one at the time we went in. I want to state that Mr. Cheney must be held accountable. He is already ginning up a cause for war against Iran. Now, we have to stand for this Constitution, we have to protect and defend this Constitution. And this vice president has violated this Constitution. So I think that while my friends on the stage may not be ready to take this stand, the American people should know that there's at least one person running for president who wants to reconnect America with its goodness, with its greatness, with its highest principles, which currently are not being reflected by those who are in the White House."

more at:
http://www.freetimes.com/stories/15/4/uncheney-melody
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't disagree with this Free Times piece, or the quote that
Edited on Wed May-30-07 05:07 PM by pinto
" 'impeachment...would be a risk for Democrats now that the White House is in reach', says David Cohen, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Akron and a fellow at UA's Bliss Institute of Applied Politics."

Yet, I feel that impeachment proceedings would *not* foster a resolution to our involvement in Iraq. They would prolong it. While the House was embroiled in defining articles and the Senate, should those articles be forwarded, be called to sit in judgment, Iraq would be off the table.

However ineffective our slim majority has been to move this administration to reality, impeachment would be a side step that overshadows any further, realistic progress.

Are there good justifications for bringing articles of impeachment? Yeah, I think so. No doubt. Would the means justify the ends? Not while Iraq continues unabated.

That's why I'm not in favor of impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Impeachment is beginning to be like Iraq....
Dennis was right about that

History will prove the Kuch right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's official ... kpete and babylonsister are karmic twins.
Same article, same timestamp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
Impeach Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kucinich is the best possible candidate..
he is the only one who will stand up to this current regime, GO DENNIS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kucinich is the only presidential candidate that has been right about the war, Bushco
And the direction that this country is headed. He has also been the only candidate who has been out front, for six lonely years, taking on this misadministration time and again while the rest of the pack has cowered, triangulated, and played political games with people's lives. Frankly he is the best, most honest candidate out there.

Yet it still amazes me that his courage and energy are scorned and ridiculed by so many here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. In a nation that elected presidents based on reason he would be the one to beat
But that is not our nation. Marketing and money elect presidents here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Woot Dennis!
Here's to spank'n their asses! :spank: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. chIMPREACH
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Dennis is not crazy so... LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC