Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many think TB Guy is not loved by his new father-in-law?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lobster Martini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:04 AM
Original message
How many think TB Guy is not loved by his new father-in-law?
It’s Friday morning, and time for a crackpot theory.

What are the odds that a guy infected with "extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis" (XDR TB), a rare and potentially fatal form of TB, would have a new father-in-law who is a CDC a research microbiologist specializing in TB and it would merely be a weird coincidence? Raise your arm if you believe this is likely.

Knowing that you have TB, what is the likelihood that you wouldn’t ask your soon-to-be father in law, the CDC scientist, whether it would be a good idea to travel outside the country? If this doesn’t seem odd, raise your other arm.

If you’re the CDC scientist, would you not suggest to your TB-infected soon-to-be son-in-law that being confined in an enclosed space like an airplane with other people might not be in the best interests of public health? If you wouldn’t, raise your other arm. (I know that’s three arms and that it would be hard to buy sweaters, but if none of the above seems odd, then you are clearly a mutant. Check yourself into quarantine immediately.)

So, if the CDC's labs “operate under the highest levels of biosecurity” as new father-in-law Robert C. Cooksey says, is this a case of attempted murder by bacteria?

If nothing else, Robert C. Cooksey is not going to receive a sweatshirt saying “World’s Greatest Dad” on Father’s Day.

End of crackpot theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your tin hat is on tooo tight
And does he dislike his daughter tooooooo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's what I was thinking. Why would he put his own daughter in jeopardy like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DKRC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Didn't the guy sneak outta the country to marry her after he was infected?
Maybe Pop thought he had effectively stopped the wedding because the man should have been in quarantine?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly. Sonny's refusal to obey put the kibosh on PopIL's plan.
Edited on Fri Jun-01-07 10:16 AM by WinkyDink
Or maybe Sonny was an "experiment".

As for putting his own daughter in jeopardy: (1.) He might not have figured on the wedding taking place (Note: In-laws not invited, I see!); (2.) Parents HAVE been known to kill their children!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I guess anything is possible, but that's really squeezing some serious tinfoil on my head without
any further details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. If this is a "coincidence" I'll eat my shorts.
Theres more here than meets the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. He ran out of anthrax about 4-5 years ago. Disappeared off the shelf for some unknown reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. there was a post here last night
questioning the motive for the US allowing this guy to fly. The poster asked the question, was it done to get other countries to give the US access to their passenger lists. There were links to articles posted about the US tracking all people who fly in the US and placing their names in a database.

By now one would think that no amount of tinfoil is too much to be wearing, since these criminals have shown that there is no limit to how low they'll stoop in accomplishing their goals. But... denial is more than just a river in Egypt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC