Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If George W. Bush had a (D) after his name, would he have been Impeached

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:56 AM
Original message
If George W. Bush had a (D) after his name, would he have been Impeached
by now? What would have been the specific charges, and more importantly, who would have brought them?

Just for fun, ask a Republican this question and watch what happens!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Dems would never have nominated this asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Remember LBJ???????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hey, welcome to DU, MNDemNY!
:hi: Good to have you here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Right. And the Democratic Party changed radically after his stint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
30. LBJ got the White House due to the assasination of John Kennedy
and he was the incumbent in 1964 when he won that election by the widest margin up to that time.

It's not like he was an untested party nominee. He had been in the Oval Office for a year prior to that election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. Remember the Civil Rights Act? War on poverty?
Edited on Fri Jun-01-07 11:32 AM by Warpy
Remember that LBJ was president because Kennedy got assassinated? Remember that a sitting president was unlikely not to have gotten the nod in the next election?

Johnson was a mixed bag with a great domestic policy and a catastrophic foreign policy.

Stupid is the worst of all bad presidents rolled into one overgrown frat boy package.

However, if the DLC, in its infinite wisdom, had nominated a putz just like him and cheated him into office, you can bet he'd have been impeached long before now.

The GOP has a history of politically motivated impeachments. The Dems don't seem to think any treasonous bastard is bad enough to impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. HIS domestic policy???
HHH ran the homefront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. To be fair, LBJ was not nominated.
He took JFK's place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
52. Who should have been impeached and wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
57. Read Robert Caro.
LBJ was a self-made man who worked at being the best politician he could be from the time he was a teenager. He was probably one of the most brilliant minds ever to be President. You may disagree with his policies & tactics, you may criticize his personality & behavior. But never make the mistake of thinking he's similar in any way to the current occupant of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's not the question, though
Presume that all things were equal with the one and only exception being a (D).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. No. They wouldn't impeach him.
For all the same reasons we aren't impeaching Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. hahah -- what are you smoking?
Jeff Gannon would have been enough for the Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Gannon was given press credentials.
That's an impeachable offense?

No wonder this place is going insane for impeachment. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. And a blowjob was?
I think you're missing out on the ironic nature of this little exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. The blowjob was not in the articles of impeachment.
There is no irony in this exercise. It's a misdirected chucklefest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Where's the misdirection?
If Clinton had pulled 1/10th of the shit * has pulled, he'd have not only been impeached, he'd have been removed. The only misdirection here is the attempt to pretend otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. You fucking thought he was impeached for getting a hummer.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Sigh -- robotic literalness as substitute for debate
I said no such thing, and your deliberate misinterpretation makes you look like a moron. Clinton lied about many things while he was in office. It was the blowjob that put the Rethugs into such a tizzy. I can't believe I have to explain this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. And now the insults.
ignore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Cool. Now maybe the grownups can talk.
Edited on Fri Jun-01-07 01:03 PM by jgraz
I love this: you deceitfully misinterpret my post, laugh at me for it and then run away crying "insults!!" when you get called on it. Does someone need to up their meds?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. True, but lying about one was
Do you honestly believe that when press reports about use of intelligence, illegal wiretapping, failure to 'protect the troops', etc. came forth that the Congress would not seek Impeachment (led by enraged Republicans)?

Guess we'll just have to disagree on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. We kinda agree -- we both agree that he's committed impeachable offenses.
But, I don't think he should be impeached. Nor do I think he'd have been impeached if he were Bush(D) rather than Bush(R).

We have some enormous issues that will not be cured by ridding ourselves of the puppet. We need to purge the entire system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive_In_NC Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. If Bush were a Dem and he was serving the Military Industrial Complex
Then yes, I do believe that they would not have impeached him by now. You don't mess with the place most of your money and access once you get to Washington comes from.

That's why Dems haven't done a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. You just described Clinton
and look what happened to him. Of course, the Dems did very little in that case as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. In a heartbeat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. It IS an interesting mind game I play often.
And the outcome is always the same, if Clinton had done ANY of the many treasonous things w has he'd have been hung from the nearest cherry tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I doubt anyone talked of impeaching LBJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. probably
But that's because Democrats would've turned on him. The problem isn't that Democrats aren't going after chimpy, its that repubs will stand with him until the bitter end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. September 12, 2001, they would have started proceedings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. No shit -- just like we should have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. IF he was even allowed to get that far
Somehow, I don't think they would have allowed him to even take the Oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. It would depend on if the GOPers would make more money
if he were impeached or unimpeached.

The same way it works under Dem control today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ask a Republican and they will tell you Bush IS a Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's a more recent development
now that they've run out of excuses for him. What would their patience have been if he were officially a (D)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. well, they been saying it more and more these last few years,
"Bush is too liberal"

"Bush's problem is that he caves into the liberals too much"

etc

Basically trying to link his failures to liberalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. Exactly. So, then, if he officially had the (D)/Liberal label politically
they would not have supported him in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. I am not saying it stands up to logic or critical thinking. Its a Republican belief, after all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. A Democratic president who stole the election through the same Florida fiasco used by bush
would have never made it to office for his attempted coup. The rightful winner would have been appointed by the dancing supremes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. And the right wouldn't have let up until that candidate was in jail
Again, just like Gore should have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yes.
And probably executed during half-time at the Superbowl.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. George D.W. Bush....nope makes no difference he's still a shit-head
...and still unimpeachable because....HIS FAMILY HAS WEALTH AND POWER AND ARE CORRUPT AND DO CRIMINAL THINGS!

People like that would NEVER be democrats even if they pretended to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. He would have been chased out of the WH by a mob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. The hypocrisy is amazing.
Republicans now cry and whine on the floor about how they are being treated by the Dems, how they didn't have enough time to read something, blah blah blah, and they did the very same things, or worse, during the 109th Congress.

I remember more than once bills being presented very late at night that were going to be voted on the next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. I also remember more than once how Dems were locked out of
conferences, bills were written "in secret" in the "middle of the night by lobbyists", and handed out about an hour before they were to be debated.

Cons only want more time for the bills so they can fax them over to K Street for comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
25. Bush does have a (D) after his name.
For Dumbshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. It'd be like the lynch mob at the end of Frankenstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. If it were Gore and he had done everything exactly the same
including the Faith based initiative, he would have been strung up or assassinated by now.
And the Dems would not have won in 06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. Impeached, convicted, and removed from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. And probably jailed for life, too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
44. The list of "Things * does that would've gotten Clinton impeached and probably shot"
is very long indeed. But when the Dear Leader does them, even people on DU will claim that impeachment is a waste of time.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
47. The vote would be 4 to 5
with Sandy voting against the plaintiff ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
51. He would have never even been IN the White House
he would have been routinely attacked in the press as an ignorant cowboy wannabee who could not link 3 words together without swallowing his tongue,

he would have been called a drunk...a deserter..a slacker who clung to daddy's threadbare coattails..

he would have been questioned relentlessly about the harken deal..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
54. Another question would be, would Democrats then be supporting his crimes out of party loyalty?
I sure hope the answer is no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. They supported LBJ out of party loyalty.
Despite his crimes in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Well then isn't party loyalty to that extent a sort of brainwashing?
In the face of such crimes why would any moral man or woman continue to support them just based on a label? What a sad stateemnt for humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
55. impeached? he never would have been able to steal the election
our team plays fair, their teams cheats, so they have an overwhelming advantage in any arena where cheating goes unpunished

also, stupid people are not allowed to run for president in the democratic party, not in recent years anyway, put the brain power of our candidates up against the brain power of their line-up of alcoholics, senile dementia victims, and drug addicts (how could we have forgotten so soon that poppy bush was a vomiting active drug addict who stammered pathetically thru his presidency, now that he's bush the smarter next to his moron son?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Then why don't Democrats in Congress support the end of electronic voting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC