Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What was our original reason to declare our right to be in, with force, the Middle East?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:39 AM
Original message
What was our original reason to declare our right to be in, with force, the Middle East?
We're there now, if you ask the one's who've increased our presence there, through force, we're there to prevent wmds from falling into the hands of Islamic Terrorists (the worst kind, I guess?). But we were there long before our invasion of Iraq. The invasion of Iraq has to be part of a bigger plan. The future's scary, if we continue on this course, escalating and escalating, over years but now quickening, our presence in a part of the world so far away. It will backfire on us, I have no doubt. Who the hell are we to tell people on the other side of the globe what to think or believe or how to live? Bad idea, and bush has gone nuts with it. He thinks its his destiny to remake the world into a mirror image of some twisted view of what he thinks America is. Its insane. But it is the past I wonder about. What was our original reason for asserting ourselves so forcefully in that part of the world? What were our original "national interests" there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Carter Doctrine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oil, and the vaccum left by the British Empire's waning
which in turn threatened the oil. And which opened the area to potential Communist influence, which in turn threatened the oil.

To be perfectly honest, there ought be no special shame in that. Oil is a vital military commodity. The Commies weren't exactly saints and I never wished for their success in undermining the US' strategic military position. My problem with it has more to do with, oh... the intervention driving the price of oil to its current high levels, the US doing nothing to change this (which in turn saved Saudi Arabia from a major internal crisis due to long-term low oil prices), the general ignorance, ham-handedness and simple (and grand) incompetence that went into asserting ourselves so forcefully in that part of the world.

Anyway, the US only got there on the ground in force after the invasion of Kuwait by Saddam Hussein. That's a historical fact. The US relied on a combination of Israel, naval aviation and quietly run air bases prior to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC