Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apparently there were only 5 at the debate last night? According to the NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:52 AM
Original message
Apparently there were only 5 at the debate last night? According to the NYT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The way to avoid having a progressive win is to deny them coverage.
How much total "talk time" did Dennis get last night?

How much did HilJohnAma get?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they gave him ten minutes and Gravel got 8
In contrast, Hillary got nearly fifteen minutes and Obama got 16.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hiljohnama! I love your name for the phenomenon of the top 3 (pollwise)
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They did it to Clark in 2004, too.
It was painful:

http://www.awesclarkdemocrat.com/2007/05/presley_marque_for_president.htm#more

And, with Dean - they put him under such a microscope that NO ONE could have survived.

I worked in media for 12 years and would have never dreamed that, in the four years I was gone by 2004, it would have gotten that bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Time clock on Chris Dodd's Blog scored it thus:
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 08:03 AM by GreenArrow
Obama 16:00
Clinton 14:26
Blitzer 13:24
Edwards 11:42
Richardson 10:48
Kucinich 9:02
Dodd 8:28
Biden 7:58
Gravel 5:37


http://chrisdodd.com/blog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thank you -- I suspected as much. Here's the image from the blog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. HilJohnAma got 42:08 minutes
:hi: With the help of his/her friend Wolfie who got more than 13 minutes

According to the NYT the no shows got 22:37

The rest got 19:16



http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/

From NBC's Mark Murray

Here are the final times each campaign received, per the Dodd campaign: Obama spoke the longest (16:00 minutes); Gravel the shortest (5:37).

Biden: 7:58 10 questions
Clinton: 14:26 15 questions
Dodd: 8:28 9 questions
Edwards: 11:42 13 questions
Gravel: 5:37 10 questions
Kucinich: 9:02 9 questions
Obama: 16:00 16 questions
Richardson: 10:48 11 questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark Twain Girl Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Exactly -- narrow the discourse to control it. HilJohnAma -- heh, indeed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. You really think that coverage is the only thing stopping DK from winning?
Seriously--and speaking as somebody who voted for him in the 2004 primary--Dennis Kucinich is probably best when he's talking for less than ten minutes. It prevents him from getting too far into his kookier ideas, like the dismantling of all nuclear weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I would *GLADLY* support someone who wants to dismantle our nukes.
They are useless for all practical purposes except
strategic deterrence against *SANE* enemies.

And yes, I believe if everyone in America could hear
him *UNFILTERED*, I believe he'd win in a walk.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Remove Dodd and Richardson, replace with Biden.
That would be a good four to choose from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. self delete
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 08:44 AM by JTFrog
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sheeit, that's more than the rest of the MSM is admitting were there.
Everybody else is simply going with Hillary, John and Obama. Apparently nobody else showed up:eyes:

It's really sad how the MSM has a huge effect on how our president is selected. Is it no wonder that corporate media favors the corporate candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. So, is that really the look of TV current affairs in the USa these days?
It looks like a parody of the Daily Show set. Which, I'm guessing now, isn't an exaggeration, as I had previously assumed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. I thought there were only 3
Even Dodd and Richardson are wasting their time, unless they're trying to forward themselves as a decent choice for VP. I don't know why they bothered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC