Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stunning Court Ruling May End Bush's War Crime Trials @ Gitmo & Mil Com Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:02 PM
Original message
Stunning Court Ruling May End Bush's War Crime Trials @ Gitmo & Mil Com Act
Sorry, I'm a little under the weather but I think this blogger might have nailed something important
but might have missed something being under the weather.
please take a look at it.

The crux of the matter is that Khadr, like every other detainee at Gitmo, is not classified as an "alien unlawful enemy combatant" - which is the basis for Bush's war trial system.
MY GOD! Could they really have missed it that easily??

In the ruling by Army Col. Peter Brownback, the judge said he had no choice but to throw out the charges.

The judge, Army Col. Peter Brownback, said he had no choice but to throw the Khadr case out because he had been classified as an "enemy combatant" by a military panel years earlier — and not as an "alien unlawful enemy combatant."
The Military Commissions Act, signed by Bush last year, specifically says that only those classified as "unlawful" enemy combatants can face war trials here, Brownback noted during the arraignment in a hilltop courtroom on this U.S. military base.

Marine Col. Dwight Sullivan, who represented the defense, further adds this:

The chief of military defense attorneys at Guantanamo Bay, Marine Col. Dwight Sullivan, said the ruling in the case of Canadian detainee Omar Khadr could spell the end of the war-crimes trial system set up last year by Congress and
President Bush after the Supreme Court threw out the previous system.
Now even more strange: The prosecution can appeal...but the court designed to hear the appeal DOES NOT EVEN EXIST.

Ok, apologies for the emotions & the weird fonts & all, but somebody tell me this is just my imagination or crazy talk.

Update:

Sullivan says this is not just a technicality:

Sullivan said the dismissal of Khadr case has "huge" impact because none of the detainees held at this isolated military base in southeast Cuba has been found to be an "unlawful" enemy combatant.
"It is not just a technicality — it's the latest demonstration that this newest system just does not work," Sullivan told journalists. "It is a system of justice that does not comport with American values."

http://www.texaskaos.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3377
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. It just means that they will have to get the legislation fixed.
They will not release anyone from Gitmo, because of this. The political prisoners at the 'Mo will just have to rot for a while longer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can't bush just declare him an unlawful enemy combatant?
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 02:14 PM by Jim__
That was my recollection, and I found this:
The phrase "unlawful combatant" does not appear in the Third Geneva Convention (GCIII).<1> However, Article 4 of GCIII does describe categories under which a person may be entitled to POW status; and there are other international treaties which deny lawful combatant status for mercenaries and children. In the United States, the Military Commissions Act codified the legal definition of this term, and invested the U.S. President with broad discretion to determine whether a person may be designated an unlawful enemy combatant.


I hope I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. We may have to call Bushco 'wanna be' fascists
since they're so fugging incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC