Rate Wolf Blitzer's job moderating the debate

[Radical Activist]

Sorry if this has been done.

[veniceboy]

1. If you are in favor of trageting Wolf if it requires bombing civilians, raise your hand...

I hated his yes/no black/white hypothetical raise your hand BS questions. Good for the candidates to call him out on it. Wolf made his career covering the destruction of countries by US bombs so I wasn't suprised by his generally pro-war questioning.

[yy4me]

2. Wolfie's main purpose of the evening was to listen to himself

blather. No matter which candidate came out on top, Blitzers presence was a distraction. His use of time was uneven, he allowed some to answer and then qualify that answer. He cut off others in mid-sentence. Is he really the best CNN can do? When his program comes on in the afternoon, it is my signal to go start preparing dinner. Between Wolfie and Tucker, 4 to 5 PM is a big TV void.

[MadBadger]

3. Wolf was awful

but I thought Williams did a decent job.

[Radical Activist]

4. I don't think Rush Limbaugh could have been more biased than Williams.

I think me and the Daily Howler were the only ones who said so, but I think Williams was horrible.

[MadBadger]

5. I'll respectfully disagree

[loyalkydem]

6. I thought

he handled himself fairly well. Too bad I won't watch tomorrow nights debate.