Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Only a strong "virtual" candidate will win a super primary. It is obvious

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 06:24 PM
Original message
Only a strong "virtual" candidate will win a super primary. It is obvious
that retail campaigning for Feb 5th is a physical impossibility. We will muddle along this Feb, but the best candidate will spend 5-10 hours a day getting live feeds(or bring local newscaster to a studio) for local TV stations newscasters.

Right now, IMO only Romney(with Bain clearchannel), Bloomberg, and Christian Broadcasting Network have the technical ability or $$$ to pull it off.

This will be the last hurray for Iowa and NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's okay; NH and Iowa are both far too white and too Republican...
It's okay; NH and Iowa are both far too white and
too Republican to have anything to do with choosing
the Democrats' candidate.

In NH, we allow independents (technically, "un-
declared" voters) to cross-over into either primary,
and we Democrats routinely have a huge cross-over
of "independents" into our primary. But these
"independents aren't really independent; they're
just Republicans who register as independent because
their wives would refuse to sleep with them if they
registered as the gay-hating, women-hating, gun-
loving Republicans that they really are.

The faster the Democrats cut their ties with NH,
the better it will be for the national party.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True they never were representative of the populace, but they provided
great memories of another time, sitting around waiting for the early midnight returns from NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. They long ago should have been tossed aside. Who anointed them with the
power to choose our candidates anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They took the job very serious and most gave them the benefit of doubt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC