Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Everybody Talks About the Weather; All of a Sudden, It’s Controversial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 05:57 AM
Original message
Everybody Talks About the Weather; All of a Sudden, It’s Controversial
Source: The New York Times

ATLANTA — For 25 years, they have been talking about the weather nonstop. At The Weather Channel, which has its headquarters here, that talk once amounted to a reliable humdrum of forecasts and storm coverage in the United States and abroad. In addition to broadcasting weather reports, the channel has thrived by selling its utilitarian but appealing content to newspapers, radio stations and Web sites, and by developing specialty programs around everyone’s favorite elevator-ride conversation topic.

“The weather is not controversial, but people are very engaged with it,” Debora J. Wilson, the president of the network, said in a recent interview in her office. As the network has seen its primary subject turn into a hot-button issue, it has had to grapple with how it wants to address it — and has decided not to tread gingerly.

The issue started influencing the network’s coverage in a new way after Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf coast in 2005, and has been shaping its programming decisions. “If The Weather Channel isn’t talking about climate change and global warming, who is?” said Kaye Zusmann, the vice president for program strategy and development for the network. “It’s our mandate.”

snip...

The lightning rod for controversy, so to speak, is Heidi Cullen, the network’s resident climate expert. In December, she raised the ire of Fox News and others by writing on her weather.com blog that the American Meteorological Society should not give its “seal of approval” to any meteorologist who “can’t speak to the fundamental science of climate change.” (There are now more than 1,700 comments on that one post.)

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/04/business/media/04weather.html



Several strong women mentioned are doing the right thing over at the Weaher Channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. When it comes to climate change, I do believe the song
"Let's Talk About It" by Dweezil and Moon Unit Zappa would fit the need. We need to talk about it. Everybody needs to talk about it. It's happening.

It's changing things drastically. Al Gore is right. The climatologists are right about it. We need to talk about it incessantly until our government does something about it. As it stands now, the US and China will be the last nations to bother trying to cut global warming trends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. true
kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Climate change isn't controversial.
I hope the Weather channel sticks to their guns about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The only thing that's controversial is the tipping point.
5 years from now? 10?

Although I know people who just think the climate is undergoing a "natural" cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It could have been 5 years ago
We very well may have already passed the tipping point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree. It wouldn't surprise me.
Whenever I see pictures of the receding glaciers, there's not much doubt wse are in very serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh so THIS is why Santorum was trying to privatize the weather
I thought it was just the old "this more money to be made off it" thing but now it is clear-they want to control the discussion on the weather too.

BTW- the Weather Channel is a great idea not just because it is so necessary but all their content is free. They get all of it from NOAA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Santorum wanted to privatize the weather because Accu-weather was a big donor to his campaign
Ricky supports whomever is giving him the big bucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sunday 6/3 TV show "It Could Happen Tomorrow" about a Category 5 hurricane hitting Miami Beach and
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 01:11 PM by Radio_Lady
Miami -- was just chilling. I was horrified just thinking this could happen. As a former Miami resident, I was totally stunned. To say we're at the mercy of the weather is putting it mildly.

Did any of you see it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gen. Jack D. Ripper Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Global Warming's a myth
but Saddam's WMDs were real!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Global warming's a myth
But Noah's Ark is factual history - how's that for bizarro world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R for my favorite channel.
Ok, cspan+ but then TWC. I bet they are having to delete a lot of threatening comments too.
Heidi Cullen is very brave, sad that she has to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. speaking of this -- another related story, on downsizing of satellite program
Scientists and professional forecasters will be up in arms about this -- anything that affects the quantity and quality of available data is going to have an impact on global warming models and impact studies (which would suit the Bushies just fine!)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2869936
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. A new take on an old saw--
Everybody's doing something about the weather, but nobody wants to talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. The " Weath - Her " Channel ?
Several strong women mentioned are doing the right thing over at the Weaher Channel.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I swear that was a typo on my part.
But it sure does work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC