Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you guys think of "white strikes"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:04 PM
Original message
What do you guys think of "white strikes"?
In which workers follow all the rules to the letter, thereby slowing everything down almost to a halt? Has it been used in the US at all? It seems like a good way of protesting, and of showing that something is fundamentally wrong with the way the system is set up.

http://www.nasaships.com/news040123_strike.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Reterr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting..I have never heard about this before/nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I remember it from Italy, when I was a kid...
They used to call it "sciopero bianco"... Somehow, it seemed like a clever tool... Man, if I followed all the rules by the book, NOTHING would get done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. In the Education biz its called work to rule
and it has moderate effectiveness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. It has been used.
Continental Airlines pilots used it about 10 years ago. They followed all regs on taxiing speed, which slowed down takeoffs and landings and really fouled up the schedules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Interesting... It's almost as if the system
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 11:10 PM by firefox_fan
requires employees to break the rules to function... And if crap happens who gets blamed? Paradoxically, those who don't follow the rules to get work done..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There's actually a term for it in business management -
though I forget what it is! It's that compensating workers do when they see a rule that will cut efficiency or productivity, and they figure out creative ways around it. But when someone gets nailed, they all instinctively begin following the rule TO THE LETTER, just to show management what happens when the rule is enforced.

The case with Continental was a little different, in that they were using it as a tool to get management to bargain, without actually going on strike or calling for a sickout. What could management do to them? They were following the rules, after all . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And that's why it's considered a step above simply working slow
Firing workers for following the rules? I hear trial lawyers coming over that hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:12 PM
Original message
This is doable. The IWW pulled similar tactics in the early 20th century.
Back then, they could count on 100,000 workers as their members, and if they decided to work slow, it hurt the bosses. Although, I don't believe they utilized white striking tactics, but I can't imagine the effect would be any different than simply working slow. Working slow and citing regulations as an excuse is a refined version of the old but tried and tested tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Heheh.... I did that once..
didn't know there was a name for it.

Centuries ago, when I was 16 and working at McDonalds, we got a new manager who was being a real prick about the rules.

So I followed EVERY rule, to a T. If food was in the bin 2 seconds longer than it was supposed to be, into the trash it went.

Go got the clue and eased up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. A slow down is well time tested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. I could because traditional strikes are an economical hardship
to the workers. Even if unions give the striking workers some money to get them through it, the loss in wages doesn't make up for it. The type of strike you describe, gives the workers their wages yet accomplishes what a strike does. I think it's far more effective. I think though that management could really go out of their way though to make working conditions hell legally like maybe turning off heat or air conditioning and claiming oops! the electricity is off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. I've done that before on my own because I was pissed off, didn't know it was a striking tactic.
Love the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Back in my days as a union member
contract negotiations were in the crapper and it became obvious that the union membership was going on strike. I advocated ratification of the contract - warts and all - and then following the letter of the law for the duration of the contract. I called it 'striking from within.'

In retrospect I still believe my suggestion would have worked out better than what occurred: a three-month strike and a return to work under a contract even more crappy than the one that the membership rejected in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. There was a funny Scrubs episode
where the nurses in the hospital did that to get more help. But remembering that show forced out all the useful information in my brain. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. All I know is that on oil projects
it's possible to do your job *so* safely that no actual work gets done. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardRocker05 Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. what's the point? all these 'rules' were supposedly enacted to protect the workers. you won't find
the anti-labor ownership bunch pressing for enforcement or enactment of rules. using the rules to slow things down would only make labor and labor-laws seem like the problem. btw, unions are already highly f-ed up, and non-organized workers would probably never try such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC