Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Critique on the Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:07 PM
Original message
Critique on the Debate
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:08 PM by quinnox
John McCain looks like an old man, no energy. Sorry, John you seem to have lost whatever you may have had.

McCain is through in my opinion.

Tom Tancredo was the most consistent and principled, sure I disagree with him completely but he at least has a coherent philosophy.

Ron Paul was the best one by far and hit it out of the park with his comments on the war and incorrect use of pre-emptive war, that it is not part of the American traditional defense strategy.

Romney came off like a used car salesman, trying to please everyone at the same time. He has a John Kerry-like flip flopper image problem.

Rudy Guliana seemed like he will continue Bush's legacy of fear and scare. The most repellent of all the candidates in my opinion. He made my skin crawl with every answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The American Empire is now approaching 1 trillion dollars a year."
-Ron Paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. good line by Paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ron Paul: Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research.
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life.
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad.
No federal funding of abortion, and pro-life.
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record.
Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC.
Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer.
Voted YES on vouchers for private & parochial schools. (
Voted NO on establishing nationwide AMBER alert system for missing kids.
Rated 76% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record.
Rated 56% by APHA, indicating a mixed record on public health issues. (
Rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a voting record restricting immigration.
Rated 47% by the AFL-CIO, indicating a mixed record on union issues.

http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Damn. Now I can't vote for him.
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:16 PM by WilliamPitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:18 PM
Original message
Many here seem enamored by him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. He speaks eloquently against the Iraq occupation
but I'm pretty sure no DUer plans to vote for him.

Only people with perfect voting records can speak against the war, I guess. Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Please spare me.
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:26 PM by Bluebear
I will repeat, many DUers seem fascinated by him BECAUSE of his speaking against the war, yet ignore all his other stances.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. They ignore his other stances because they don't support him
and won't vote for him.

Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I forgot, how damn stupid of me.
By the way, do read this by the same OP:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=997406

Some people can speak out about the war, except for mothers of dead soldiers. Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. that thread has nothing to do with this
I never said anything about Cindy not having a right to speak out, why you drag this into my thread is strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. And that has what to do with Paul?
Nice try.

I reject your premise.

I'm also bored by this.

Have a good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Your record of patronizing snarkiness lies intact.
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:35 PM by Bluebear
Good job. Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Thank God.
One of us has to be consistent, I guess.

Oh wait, you are.

(he shoots, he scores)

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Couldn't Win The Debate With Actual Reasoning, So Ya Deflected With An Unrelated Thread? Too Funny!
I'd say ya got handed your hat on this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Yo, Pitt.
Answer two questions for me.

You're a yellow-dog Dem, right?

How does a yellow-dog Dem give eventhismuch credence to a don't-know-what-the-fuck-he-wants-to-be-from-one-day-to-the-next "former Libertarian" like Ron Paul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. exactly
Ron paul is right on the war and there is no harm in applauding him for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. I tend to agree. I've seen a fair amount of gushing praise for him
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:43 PM by Marr
on several blogs. If it came down to Hillary Clinton and Ron Paul, something tells me that a fair number of DUers would vote for the stronger critic of the Iraq occupation. Ignoring the rest of his record isn't doing anyone a favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I appreciate it.
I have nothing against the man personally and just was pointing out what I , too have observed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. It will come down to Clinton v. Paul
right before the Earth crashes into the sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I didn't say I expect it to come down to Clinton and Paul.
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 09:16 PM by Marr
I'm saying that, if it did, I would expect Ron Paul to have a measurable degree of Democratic support, because most people aren't aware of his stance on anything but Iraq. That Democratic support exists- whether or not he'll ever have the opportunity to cash it in is a separate question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZinZen Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. This is a Libertarian?????????
I always thought Libertarians wanted to stay out of people's private lives. Paul is a douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I watched it
with two of my kids. We had fun predicting each candidate's answer to each question. My son said that Mitt could talk a half-hour, and never say more than, "Ronald Reagan. The future."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. 'We can't run on reform! We're the damn incumbents!"
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:51 PM by Marr


They kept reminding me of Pappy O'Daniel. They repeatedly tried to blame all these Republican messes on liberals. That might've flown once, but we've had a one-party government for so long that they couldn't just point at the opposition branch and blame that for everything.

They had to say that the Republican Party's only problem is that they have behaved like liberals, which only makes the viewer ask, "well then why the hell should I vote for you?".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Agree with your opinion %99, I thought McCain picked it up on the end.
He was very thoughtful in the second half. I wouldn't vote for him, but I thought he picked up his game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. They already had the debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ron Paul won me over on the war issue! One of them said bush was a liberal!
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:33 PM by DianaForRussFeingold
He could use a dictionary! Ron Paul will win over a lot of NEW Democrats, especially the ones that left their party due to bush. The following is what the Dems should be saying! "War and incorrect use of pre-emptive war, that it is not part of the American traditional defense strategy." Pretty bad, a Republican Conservative has to be the one to tell it like it is! Edited due to migraine aura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. 'Ron Paul will win over a lot of NEW Democrats'
I hope not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. I sincerely hope he won't but I have to admit I am a little frustrated
:dem: :dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
49. Me too. How a dem could vote for Libertarian "economics" defies reason.
His war stance notwithstanding, Ron Paul is still a libertarian social darwinist at heart. So he shows a little common sense on the war in Iraq, so what? There ARE other issues, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. "He has a John Kerry-like flip flopper image problem."
What an idiotic wingnut bullshit talking point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. look, it is true
I know you are a big Kerry fan but the truth is Kerry did have an image problem of being a flip flopper in 2004 election, like it or not. Kerry made bad mistakes and the republicans were able to paint him in this light by using Kerry's miscues... "voted for it before voted against it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. That's absolute nonsense!
Romney changes his story every chance he gets. That a big difference from a gullible public buying a Rovian talking point, which you continue to spew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I agree in part
But I'm talking more image than substance. You are right about the substance but I'm talking the image, public perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. You're repeating Rovian spin! Period! n/t
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:47 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. 'Kerry sealed it - no more Mass. liberals'
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 08:51 PM by Bluebear
'First we tried Mondale and failed. Then Dukakis (ugh - the less said the better). Then Kerry, close but no cigar. No more Massachusetts liberals for president. I think Kerry sealed the deal, and wonder if there will be another for at least a generation.'

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x274674

Someone just didn't care for Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. lol - are you going to post every thread I ever did
that you didn't like?

I was a huge Kerry fan in the primary but I think he made critical mistakes in the general election, so sue me!

I stand by my threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. At least you know now that they are memorable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. well I try
I think it is necessary sometimes to put a little spice in threads to make it interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. delete. got the point
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 09:53 PM by politicasista
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. BS
All you are saying is that you drunk the koolaid. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
20.  Critique is dead on!
:hi: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
35. Sam Brownback expresses concern over cancer
yet doesn't believe in stem-cell research....Memo to Sam, rather difficult to cure deadly diseases like cancer, etc. when you DON'T BELIEVE in stem-cell research, :crazy:

I'm also convinced Mike Huckabee believes the earth is not only flat, but that it is 5,000 years old!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. Empower consumer choice, disempower family choice ?
Did I gather that correctly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sorry, but you are not going to make me support Hillary
by putting down fellow Democrats. It's a put off. Funny or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. that isn't my aim
I'm starting to notice something, a lot of Kerry people showing up here. Well, glad that you all are staunch Kerry supporters, but I'm going to call it like I see it. And in my opinion Romney does remind of John Kerry. The same state, the same image problems. A flip flopper who changed his position dramatically in order to please the conservatives now that he is running for president. He even is viewed as a "Massachussetts liberal" by some in the far right wing. Also, superficially, Romney has the big hair just like Kerry, and somewhat resembles Kerry physically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. And I stand by my post
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 09:38 PM by politicasista
You think the RW and the media will go easy on any Dem?

Plus, I know you support Hillary and attack other Democrats to promote her. If you have an opinion about Romney, then leave Kerry and the RW talking points out of this discussion. They should NOT even be compared. Kerry has been the opposite of what you say. He is consistent. Romney, on the other hand is a slick douchebag.


It is downright sad that a Democratic site repeats RW lies about a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
42. Ron Paul is going to divide the repuke party in two.
;)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Maybe
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 10:53 PM by DianaForRussFeingold
Preempt and Plunder :evilgrin: Great Bumper-sticker :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC