Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator charges improper political interference in Justice Department

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 07:02 AM
Original message
Senator charges improper political interference in Justice Department
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/17328350.htm

Senator charges improper political interference in Justice Department
By Greg Gordon
McClatchy Newspapers



WASHINGTON -Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy angrily threatened Tuesday to issue subpoenas "if the White House continues to stonewall" his panel's investigation into fired U.S. attorneys, and he said he was "deeply troubled" by what he called White House efforts to "manipulate the (Justice) Department into its own political arm."

Leahy, D-Vt., charged that "every week seems to bring new revelations about the erosion of independence at the Justice Department. This administration was willing, in the U.S. attorney firings and in the vetting of career hires for political allegiance, to sacrifice the independence of law enforcement and the rule of law for loyalty to the White House."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just issue the subpeonas...stop nattering about it...do it!
Jeebus almighty, threats without action are worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I still haven't gotten an answer concerning what they do if those
subpoenas are ignored, as Condi has done. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They cluck their tongues and shake their heads...
and nothing changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Opening Statement Of Sen. Patrick Leahy - Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee
Also, link to the hearing here: VIDEO or AUDIO links, http://leahy.senate.gov/

Opening Statement Of Sen. Patrick Leahy - Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee
Hearing On “Preserving Prosecutorial Independence: Is The Department Of Justice Politicizing The Hiring And Firing Of U.S. Attorneys? – Part V”
June 5, 2007
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/060507c.html

Today, the Committee continues its investigation into political influences affecting the Justice Department. Stonewalling by this Administration, conflicts in testimony and failures of memory by the Attorney General and others have greatly hampered our efforts to get to the bottom of these matters. When the President complains that these matters are being “drug out,” he need look no farther than his own White House and the Justice Department leadership he appointed for the reasons this continues to fester. The Administration should come clean, quit hiding the truth and own up to its misdeeds. The functions of the Department of Justice should be above politics. Law enforcement, civil rights enforcement, and voting rights are all too important to be enmeshed in Karl Rove’s partisan political operations.

Despite the testimony of officials from this Administration, we are learning through press accounts that many more than seven U.S. Attorneys were replaced and that perhaps a dozen or two dozen or three dozen were considered for firing. It was only through press accounts -- not the testimony of Department employees or the selective documents the Department has so far produced -- that the public learned that one of our witnesses today, Todd Graves, the former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, was on those lists and asked to resign. He is from an earlier wave of replacements in 2006.

We have also learned in recent weeks about apparently extensive efforts by operatives of this Administration to screen the political allegiances of applicants for career law enforcement positions. Former Deputy Attorney General Jim Comey has said such efforts to apply a partisan litmus test strike “at the core of what the department is.” We know from her guarded admissions before the House Judiciary Committee that Monica Goodling “crossed the line” in engaging in this conduct. Who else at the Department was involved, who knew this was going on, who acquiesced or approved it, who directed it? These are all questions that the Department of Justice has refused to answer or explain.

We have been notified that the Inspector General has expanded his investigation to include some of these matters. I am writing him asking whether he is also expanding his investigation to include the meeting in which Attorney General Gonzales made Ms. Goodling “uncomfortable” by inappropriately communicating with her about matters under investigation in what appears to be an effort to influence her testimony.

Our first witness today is Bradley Schlozman, the first interim U.S. Attorney appointed by Attorney General Gonzales pursuant to the authority granted in the Patriot Act reauthorization that has since been repealed by this Congress. We hope to learn the unvarnished facts from Mr. Scholzman about these unprecedented U.S. attorney replacements and use of partisan considerations in career hiring. We also have questions about Mr. Schlozman’s role as the interim U.S. Attorney and while at the Civil Rights Divisions in pressing certain cases in connection with recent elections.

I am deeply troubled by what appears to be an effort by the White House to manipulate the Department into its own political arm. The White House cannot have it both ways -- it cannot withhold documents and witnesses and thereby stonewall the investigation and, at the same time, claim that the facts about White House influence over federal law enforcement have not been revealed in detail. Because the White House has continued its refusal to provide information to the Senate Judiciary Committee on a voluntary basis, I will soon have no choice but to issue subpoenas. If the White House continues to stonewall, the obvious conclusion is that they are hiding the truth because they have something to hide.

Today, I hope we can begin to better understand the role that efforts to influence elections in the name of pursuing “voter fraud” may have played a role in these dismissals of federal prosecutors. The American people deserve a strong and independent Department of Justice with leaders who enforce the law without fear or favor. Every week seems to bring new revelations about the erosion of independence at the Justice Department. This Administration was willing, in the U.S. Attorney firings and in the vetting of career hires for political allegiance, to sacrifice the independence of law enforcement and the rule of law for loyalty to the White House. The obligations of the Justice Department are to the Constitution, the rule of law, and to the American people, not to the political considerations of this White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC