Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time: Rove Named in Alabama Controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 09:23 AM
Original message
Time: Rove Named in Alabama Controversy
This was posted last Friday, but quickly to the bottom and (surprise, surprise!) it hasn't been heard on any news source since. Maybe we should all either printout out or go buy the issue of Time and mail it in to our Congress critters--Highlighters recommended!

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1627427,00.html?xid=rss-nation
<snip>
Now Karl Rove, the President's top political strategist, has been implicated in the controversy. A longtime Republican lawyer in Alabama swears she heard a top G.O.P. operative in the state say that Rove "had spoken with the Department of Justice" about "pursuing" Siegelman, with help from two of Alabama's U.S. attorneys.

The allegation was made by Dana Jill Simpson, a lifelong Republican and lawyer who practices in Alabama. She made the charges in a May 21 affidavit, obtained by TIME, in which she describes a conference call on November 18, 2002, which involved a group of senior aides to Bob Riley, who had just narrowly defeated Siegelman in a bitterly contested election for governor. Though Republican Riley, a former Congressman, initially found himself behind by several thousand votes, he had pulled ahead at the last minute when disputed ballots were tallied in his favor. After the abrupt vote turnaround, Siegelman sought a recount. The Simpson affidavit says the conference call focused on how the Riley campaign could get Siegelman to withdraw his challenge.

<snip>
Canary reassured others on the conference call — who also included Riley's son, Rob, and Terry Butts, another Riley lawyer and former justice of the Alabama supreme court — that he had the help of a powerful pal in Washington. Canary said "not to worry — that he had already gotten it worked out with Karl and Karl had spoken with the Department of Justice and the Department of Justice was already pursuing Don Siegelman," the Simpson affidavit says. Both U.S. attorney offices subsequently indicted Siegelman on a variety of charges, although Leura Canary recused herself from dealing with the case in May 2002. A federal judge dismissed the Northern District case before it could be tried, but Siegelman was convicted in the Middle District on bribery and conspiracy charges last June.

<snip>
Siegelman was convicted of appointing Scrushy to a hospital regulatory board in exchange for a $500,000 contribution to a campaign for a state lottery to fund education. Defense lawyers have argued that Siegelman drew no personal financial benefit from Scrushy's donation to the lottery campaign, and they note that Scrushy had served on the hospital regulatory board under three previous governors, before Siegelman reappointed him. The reappointment, they have argued, offered little of value to Scrushy except more work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R!
The stain of this Rove/DOJ scandal just keeps spreading. How much longer can this be tolerated? Forever? Looks like...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't you think some of these accusations would stick?
What's the number, by now? Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They would stick if the MSM didn't bury them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick for the 3-11 and lunch crowd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Abramoff and Kark Rove Linked to Prosecution of Ex-Alabama Governor and Campaign Finances
There is much more to the story than Time tells us. We will be hearing a lot more of this, I'm sure.

Abramoff and Kark Rove Linked to Prosecution of Ex-Alabama Governor and Campaign Finances
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1023111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebaby3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rove has other ties to criminal politics in AL. Back in the 90s, he was in AL
Edited on Thu Jun-07-07 12:41 AM by peacebaby3
and worked on a campaign for a judge. His opponent was the incumbent (it may have been Mark Montiel)and he did a lot of work with children's organizations so scummy Rove started a rumor that he was a pedophile. I believe both candidates were repukes as well.

I can't remember all the details, but Karl's slimy, bloated hands have been involved in AL politics before. He is truly an evil man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC