Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does the timing of the Jefferson thing look a bit suspicious?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bookman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:40 AM
Original message
Does the timing of the Jefferson thing look a bit suspicious?
Today's Houston Chronicle had an editorial cartoon and editorial on William Jefferson, not anything outstanding on the Libby sentence. It appears they were just holding this and making the point that corruption is equal in both parties. Nonsense.

Make the crook resign and move on to the other crooks, Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. read on some
Edited on Wed Jun-06-07 11:48 AM by azurnoir
stupid a** righty blog that Jefferson was Gonzo's revenge, and supposedly a warning shot to the Congressional Dem's and that if they persist in "persecuting" the WH there will be more to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. no, the prosecutor was careful and detailed.
much like Fitz. If they wanted to fuck with the election, they would have rushed it out in november.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. well, I have seen some folks spin it as Democratic hypocrisy
and how it shows that the culture of corruption is bipartisan.

My response is that one person and his 2 aides do not a "culture" make.

The funniest is one guy tried to say how if it were a Republican in this situation, the media would be all over it, but are ignoring Jefferson. Right....

Speaking of which, did Delay ever go to trial yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've had a couple of Republicans mention this "Jefferson scandal" to me
in a way that suggests it's one of the worst things they've ever heard of.

I reminded them of Cunningham, and pointed out that he was a Republican. Then I mention Abramoff.

Then I tell them that contrary to what the Republicans did about their corruption scandals, the Dems would likely deal with Jefferson in a manner that ensured justice is served.

It doesn't matter who it is, if they've broken the law they should have to answer for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. No. And Why Does Everything Just Have To Always Be A Conspiracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. I, too, am a little suspicious, given the circumstances.
However, congressman Jefferson, although not yet convicted by a court, is pretty well established as a consummate crook.
Although there is probably no really good time to execute his indictment and it did take a bit of the pressure off the widespread and unforgivable corruption extant in the republican party, it is best that the problem be exposed as soon as possible and all the members of congress need to take quick, decisive action to correct the situation.

The man should be pressured to resign-immediately-and all possible action brought to bear to get back to an even keel, one wherein we can again point out the pervasive and ongoing destruction of our country by his fellow miscreants from a position of moral superiority.
Some study should also be done to determine why he was reelected, given that his misdeeds were pretty obvious well before the last election.

We have no need for such predators in our government and the rules must apply to all, equally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not really, this thing has been dragged out seemingly forever....
My question is why is Tom Delay still walking around freely, earning big speaking fees, and writing books? I am just floored by his high visibility since being booted from Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. this has been draging on forever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. YES
and when the Republican "US Attorney" came out to read the charges--how did any of us know it wasn't just another of their department-wide "Screw Democrats" initiative.

We don't that's what.

If he is guilty, he should be tried and punished. But I have no faith in this justice department that charges agaiinst Democrats are legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. bait
They knew Jefferson needed the money that he ended up putting in his freezer; they went out of their way to entrap him. I imagine they tried to entrap many other Dem leaders, but Jefferson seems to be the only one to take the bait thus far. They don't have anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_06 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ah...come on
Jefferson is innocent until proven guilty in court, but the charges are legitimate. He was caught on tape taking the $90,000 which was subsequently found wrapped in tin foil in his freezer. Two men who worked for him are going to jail as well as testifying against him.

Just because he's a Democrat doesn't make him a saint, sometimes Democrats do bad things too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. agreed
All I'm saying is that if he's all they could come up with, then the Dems must be fairly clean. They've known for a while that Delay/Abromoff/Plame/DMS/Gonzogate/World Bank/Iraq could become problematic for them, so I think they were hoping to show that there's corruption on our side of the aisle as well. Of course there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good RIDDANCE!! to William Jefferson!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. I agree Jefferson is a crook.
I just questioned both the timing and the attempt to "equalize" it with the slew of Republicans.

I honestly think if it was a republican the USDA would announce it Friday evening.

Sorry, just a skeptic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. Suspicious maybe, but I could care less because he deserves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC