Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dealing with Terrorism, New York Style

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 05:22 PM
Original message
Dealing with Terrorism, New York Style
As my favorite line in "Sweet Smell of Success" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051036/) goes, "I love this dirty town!"

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/06/times_bloomberg_decree_jfk_ter.html

‘Times,’ Bloomberg Decree JFK Terror Plot Barely Fit to Print

It's good to see some old-fashioned New York spirit seep back into our dealings with the evil, evil evildoers. Yesterday, we happily listened to Mayor Bloomberg channel (for once!) an authentic fuggeddaboudit 'tude: "You can't sit there and worry about everything. Get a life. You have a much greater danger of being hit by lightning than being struck by a terrorist." Flippancy is the new vigilance! Today, the Times gets in on the act the way only the Times can — haughtily yet self-consciously. National editor Suzanne Daley, fielding readers' questions, explained why the paper defiantly stuck the JFK pipeline plot into the Metro section: "Not all plots are the same," she wrote. "The plotters had yet to lay out plans. They had no financing. Nor did they have any explosives." Hear that, aspiring terrorists? No above-the-fold action unless you're sitting on an A-bomb. Daley continued: "Some argued should have been fronted, regardless of the lameness of the plot, simply because it was what everyone was talking about."

It's nice to know the days when John Ashcroft would hiss something about "chatter" and we'd all dash for duct tape are gone with, well, John Ashcroft. It's equally nice that a story's popularity apparently doesn't even figure into the logic of the Times' front-page meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC