Do we really need another terror attack to kick off the Iran war?

[Philosoraptor]

I mean, I know that's how we got into Afghanistan and Iraq, we had a terrible terror attack, every hijackers's name and face were published the very next day, Osama was accused, and the nine eleven attacks were the catalyst for invading and conquering and bombing and stealing and mass murder.

Now, ALL signs point to the very same scenario happening again. The neo boys just can't wait for another terror attack to repeat the exact same horrific scenario. Let's face it, the neo cons don't think logically like we do, they simply plan and act, outcome be damned. They are right now planning the Iran war, and they know that America has no stomach for more war, and they know how well it all worked out for them after nine eleven.

It could be Al Qaeda, it could even be a hurricane or earthquake, but make no mistake, they are poised and ready for something big to happen so they can swoop in and fuck us all up real good. I believe that it's o.k. to be paranoid now, although I was paranoid before paranoid was cool.

So in conclusion dear neo cons, do we REALLY need to have another terror attack to prove that we need to go to war with Iran and take out their nukes and leaders and oil? Can't you just save us a lot of trouble and bloodshed by simply bombing and invading and conquering Iran like you plan to anyway?

You neos are absolutely drooling for the next attack, why wait?

[radfringe]

1. election booga-booga

no they don't need a "real excuse" anything they can cherry-pick and manipulate as a "reason" (truth or fiction) will do

the republic candidates were all about swinging a big stick

[wakeme2008]

2. IMHO there will be no Iran attack by Bush

because

A) Nobody believes Bush anymore

B) The military is broken and they do not have the will to start another Iraq War

c) All Repugs know, if the Iran War turns into another Iraq War not only will they be the minority party in 2009 but a very small minority party.

OK I am hoping the crazy one will not attack...

[CJCRANE]

3. 9/11 was a two-fer...

it allowed Bushco to attack American democracy and civil liberties at home and start his pre-emptive wars abroad.

Another terror attack will more likely be used to finish the job at home.

[Amonester]

4. Yeah. Otherwise, why all these "empty" (for now...) internment camps?

Methinks the bu$che's Gestapian junta's gonna blow a 'mini' near the potomac once their chimp is out and the house is in session...

It's Darth Chainy's obsession these days.

[zbdent]

5. We don't NEED it

but we'll get it ...

you don't always get what you need (or want) (despite what the Rolling Stones say), but I'm sure that we'll GET the Iran war ...