US Attorney Hit List in 2005? Emails tell story. "Scoop"/Collins

[autorank]

Never say anything in an email you wouldn’t say in public...

From: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0706/S00061.htm

Collins: US Attorney Hit List As Early As 2005?

Saturday, 9 June 2007, 7:45 pm
Opinion: Michael Collins


House of Games

What's the Motive?

Michael Collins
"Scoop" Independent News
Washington, DC

Carol Lam was one outstanding United States Attorney. She nailed down one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history with a guilty plea from former Republican Congressman Randal “Duke” Cunningham in November, 2005. His crimes included conspiracy to commit bribery, mail and wire fraud.

The San Diego Republican admitted to taking over $1.0 million alone from San Diego defense contractor Brent Wilkes. The jailed Cunningham is now serving an eight year sentence for this and other crimes. In one of her last official acts, Lam indicted Wilkes for bribing former CIA senior executive “Dusty” Foggo, who was also indicted. These crimes allegedly took place over a period as far back to 2002.

A recently released Department of Justice email carried by Talking Points Memo Document Collectoin raises an interesting question. The message is dated”3/7/2005” from leoleonard to MaryBeth Buchanan:



Leo Leonard, the sender, is apparently this Republican activist. He’s listed by Media Transparency as the , Director Lawyers Division of the Federalist Society for Law and Public PolicyStudies.

Mary Beth Buchanan, the presumed recipient of the memo, is the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. She was a John Ashcroft protégé. Her role at Justice was central. Her bio states that, “At the request of the Attorney General, Ms. Buchanan also served from June 2004 until June 2005 as the Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys.”

Think Progress and TPM.com blogger cici1414 quickly suggested that the memo from leoleonard to MaryBeth was indeed about replacing Lam with attorney Mary Walker, a hard right Republican.

If so, what was so hot that Lam was in the neoJustice crosshairs as far back as the date of the Email, March 7, 2005.

Why Target a Successful U.S. Attorney

Why not if she’s sending sheep in to a mine field filled with deadly secrets?

The McClatchy Washington Bureau noted:

On May 11, 2006, Kyle Sampson, then Gonzales' chief of staff, sent an e-mail to deputy White House counsel William Kelley, asking Kelley to call to discuss "the real problem we have right now with Carol Lam that leads me to conclude that we should have someone ready to be nominated on 11/18, the day her 4-year term expires."

It doesn’t get any clearer than this. Sampson refers to “the real problem we have right now with Carol Lam.” But this was May 2006. We’ve got a March 2005 email to interpret, if in fact replacing Lam is the subject of the email.

Here is some convincing evidence that her early retirement (aka dismissal) was long sought. Right as she left office, Lam offered up the detailed indictment of Foggo and Bent Wilkes.


Talking Point Memo Document Collection, 02/13/2007
The indictment goes on to list mail and wire fraud, bribery, and other crimes that are so ineptly hidden it takes one aback.

As the indictment alleges, “Defendant WILKES and other conspirators provided things of value to defendant FOGGO and defendant FOGGO accepted these things of value.”

But why?

According to the indictment, the motive for the relationship was influence over major contracts with the US government, in this case CIA, also known as the minefield. Foggo gave Wilkes access to highly sensitive information that Wilkes had no right to see due to a lack of security clearance. Wilkes used that information to get contracts for his corporation.

Wilkes made out like a bandit with a nine figure contract to show for his investment. A good time was had by all at vacation spots and posh restaurants, as the indictment attests. One of those vacation hideaways was a mansion in Hawaii that Foggo was reported to have enjoyed.

Was There a Bigger Story to Cover Up?

Maybe there was and it would have been percolating form about the time Lam came on as a U.S. Attorney in 2002 through the April 2005 date listed in the Foggo - Wilkes indictment. What was going on at that time in Lam’s back yard?

According to Brent Wilkes, he was in the ongoing business of doling out money for congressmen in return for favorable consideration According to the San Diego Union:

Several of Wilkes' former employees and business associates say he used the hospitality suites over the past 15 years to curry favor with lawmakers as well as officials with the CIA, where both Wilkes and Wade sought contracts.

Wilkes hosted parties for lawmakers and periodic poker games that included CIA officials as well as members of the House Appropriations and Intelligence committees. Cunningham, who sat on both committees, was a frequent guest, according to some of the participants in the poker games.

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo was more direct:

That's how we get into the other part of this story -- those 'hospitality suites', that moveable feast of food, poker and love, Brent Wilkes ran in Washington for maybe fifteen years. Josh Marshall 05/05/2007

Wilkes didn’t think much of the lobbying process and said so to the New York Times: “Offering a rare insider’s view, Mr. Wilkes described the appropriations process as little more than a shakedown.”

This was much more than a pay for play scandal in Washington or a political newbie showing up and throwing some money around. We’re talking about allegations that national security officials were bribed; a chilling thought since there are Wilkes all over the world in places not too friendly to the United States. In addition, there’s the sleazy entertainment angle with a 15 year history spoken of freely by a number of publications.

Stop Right There

There’s enough evidence in this well documented scenario to justify asking if Lam’s forced retirement was linked to her aggressive exposure of the Cunningham – Brent Wilkes - CIA connection. It’s bad enough to have free-wheeling, loose cannon, West Coast defense contractor bragging about paying off lobbyist shakedowns in order to gain congressional influence. It’s even worse to see an indictment describing how the number three executive at CIA took bribes and shared national security information But it’s utterly unbearable, if you know the public taste for scandal, to think that the story uncovered will lead with information about a scene like this described in Harpers magazine:

As to the festivities themselves, I hear that party nights began early with poker games (see Clarification, below) and degenerated into what the source described as a "frat party" scene—real bacchanals. Apparently photographs were taken, and investigators are anxiously procuring copies. My heart beats faster in fevered anticipation. Harpers Magazine 04/27/2006

On March 12, 2005 "Scoop" Independent News ran this:

Exposed and disgraced, Cunningham resigned after the indictment and apparently began singing the right tunes for the prosecutor. Lam widened her investigation and connected Cunningham’s cash cow, defense contractor Brent Wilkes, with a broader potential scandal involving Wilkes and former CIA executive Dusty Foggo.

That may not be the right reason to replace a hard nosed U.S. Attorney but, given the facts, it’s certainly a logical reason. At the end of 2005, researcher and blogger Joseph Cannon reported the findings of his extensive research:

The truth: Wilkes was a mechanism by which public funds earmarked for national defense were funneled to G.O.P. candidates and causes.

We can only imagine what’s hiding behind the public face of the scandal?

We may be stuck with only our imaginations if someone doesn’t start talking soon..

Will it be MaryBeth, who now knows that she was added to the list of U.S. Attorneys targeted for dismissal? Isn’t that what got the first eight fired federal prosecutors riled up and talking in the first place?

Report: U.S. Attorney Buchanan to meet with House Judiciary investigators
06/06/2007 (Associated Press)

PITTSBURGH -- U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan of Pittsburgh will meet privately Thursday with House Judiciary Committee investigators looking into the Justice Department's firing of eight federal prosecutors last year, her attorney told a newspaper.

Buchanan's attorney, Roscoe C. Howard J. -- the former U.S. Attorney of Washington, D.C. -- told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that he's representing Buchanan at the meeting in Washington.

Howard said Buchanan is cooperating with the investigation, but said it was premature to speculate about what she might be asked.
"They might go into areas that surprise us," Howard told the newspaper.

ENDS

Acknowledgement:Special thanks to internet poster mod mom for her tips and suggestions. To look into the abyss of the Wilkes scandal, see Joseph Cannon’s Wilkes, the Invisible Empire and Deeper into the Wilkes/MZM scandals (Updated

Permission to reprint with an attribution to the author and a link to this article at “Scoop” Independent News.

[stellanoir]

1. but. . .but. . .but. . .

what does this have to do with Paris and bad car crash scenarios. . .?

No seriously, there are so many facets and levels to the targeting of those prosecutors it's no wonder that people would rather focus on a blonde behaving badly.

Ughhh

Thanks for digging up all this stuff though.

K & R'd

[Me.]

2. Why Do They Always Take Photos?

For God's sake, if you're going to be a crook act like one. But that's the problem. It's gotten so bad that they don't even try to hide what they done. The six years of publican rule has brought us unbelievably criminality iced with hubris and arrogance.

Tony Soprano wouldn't have these guys on his crew if they paid him, and of course they would.

[autorank]

3. Everybody pays Tony;)

That's next, one of these Federal types will actually video tape the crimes like the teens do on occasion. They'll show it to friends and then it will get out. I think that should be a goal as
a matter of fact.

Monday Gonzales gets a vote of no confidence. If you owned a business where Gonzales worked, would you fire him or tell him he'd received a vote of no confidence (option 3 is a swift boot;)?

[Me.]

5. Option 2 Is Confusing

Wouldn't he know if he got a no confidence vote, would he need to be told? And what about option 4, being slammed in the slammer for a) breaking our laws and b) arranging for the torture of people.

Or maybe option 5, waterboard the little sob?

[autorank]

7. "arranging for the torture o people"

To me, that's right after a war based on lies and stealing elections. How on earth can we have a "Hilton like" government corporation of terror hotels around the world? What has happened to us?

I think that the post by arent is so true. We're at the end and we need a real assessment and new beginning. McClellan Democrats and the Death of the Republic

[Me.]

9. Ok, Then, We Might Be Onto Another Magangement Thread

Russia may be the savior of the world, in a totally unplanned, bizarre way, because Russia is becoming unmanageble. What these people never get, is that people don't like being poor.

[autorank]

15. "The poor" is an eternal concept for the proponents of feudal society

You bet. But there's a new term I've been floating ... "consumer units."

A consumer unit is just that, a human being who pays to consume what 'management' produces.

They need money to pay for the goods, a concept 'management' seems to have trouble grasping.

'Management' keeps looking at the balance sheet as the truth and the essence of that truth is
improving the 'bottom line' instead of creating larger markets through better paid 'consumer units.'

While margins and income can improve through this trick and manipulation of the tax code, the change
is illusory since a trend is started that ends up with the impoverishment of the 'units.' That means
no more sales. When that happens the 'units' become agitated and who knows what will happen.

Our ruling class is not very bright, sort of like the British royal family. They've had too much too
long and think they're smart, rather than lucky. Hence their persistence with these illusions.

The real risk to 'management' is a shift in consciousness among the consumer units. That's really
dangerous because one thing is for sure, we don't need 'management,' not even a little bit. In fact
'management' creates problems as indicated above.


'

[Totally Committed]

4. I agree... at first, they just kept throwing shi* at the wall s to see what stuck.

The smell of the sh*t was a dead giveaway. But, they kept on, boldly, and sometimes with the direct acquiescense of our own Democratic electeds. Now, it just seems, the level of crime, and their brazenness has paid off. Only those of us with a sharp sense of smell even notice all the sh*t-covered walls any longer.

Another great post, autorank!

TC

[The Backlash Cometh]

6. Will Jefferson get 8 years?

Does anybody have enough information on both cases to give us a comparative analysis?

[autorank]

13. I don't but that's a good question and it makes a lot of sense to ask it.

I changed around on the Libby verdict a bit after I read Judge Walton's stunning castigation of the academic and other attorneys who wrote letters in Libby's behalf. He as much as said that they did it for money and they should use that money to defend some indigent defendants. Wow. That doesn't indicate that he went lightly. But you never know. We need a lawyer in the DC bar or someone very familiar with it.

[bleever]

8. I can clearly see that it's "USA" blacked out in the email

from Leonard Leo, i.e. "U.S. Attorney San Diego."

Great work. I don't think there's any containing this scandal, and it ties together with so many other scandals.

[mod mom]

10. Control of the DOJ was used to prevent investigations into rampant corruption AND

help control elections by only keeping "loyal bu$hies" employed. Isn't it impeachment time yet?

Another good one Auto!

[autorank]

12. Thank you for the tip on the TPM info drop...that email's a curious one, isn't it.

There is so much dirt to look at, it amazes me.

Where to start;)

[mod mom]

14. My pleasure.

I wish I had more time to devote but between end of school events, kid swim team + diving team schedules and my sustainability group I can hardly keep a float.

Just want to let you know you're doing a great job!

[Kurovski]

11. Kick. (nt)