Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DoJ Legal Counsel Contradicts Gonzales, Suggests Other Spying Programs Exist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:29 PM
Original message
DoJ Legal Counsel Contradicts Gonzales, Suggests Other Spying Programs Exist
Edited on Sat Jun-09-07 12:30 PM by kpete
DoJ Legal Counsel Contradicts Gonzales, Suggests Other Spying Programs Exist

The House Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution held a hearing on Thursday to examine the administration’s specious arguments about the legal authority it has asserted to conduct warrantless wiretapping of Americans.

Steven Bradbury, the principal deputy assistant attorney general and the head of the Office of Legal Counsel, testified before the committee. Under questioning from Rep. Mel Watt (D-NC), Bradbury claimed that former Attorney General John Ashcroft’s reservations about signing onto the White House’s domestic spying efforts in 2004 were actually in reference to a different spying program than the one President Bush has revealed:

REP. WATT: Mr. Bradbury, did former Attorney General Ashcroft express reservations, legal reservation about some aspect — whatever they were; I’m not even going to get into that — of the surveillance program?

MR. BRADBURY: Congressman, the attorney general has indicated that, as you might expect with complicated national security matters, disagreements arose about aspects of intelligence activities, the details of operations and intelligence activities that are not public, that remain highly classified –

REP. WATT: I’m not asking you to make anything public. I’m asking you, does that mean that the former attorney general had some reservations about — legal reservations about some aspects of the program, Mr. Bradbury?

MR. BRADBURY: Well, all I’ll say is what the attorney general has said, which is that disagreements arose, disagreements were addressed and resolved; however, those disagreements did not — were not about the particular activities that the president has publicly described, that we have termed the Terrorist Surveillance Program.


more at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/09/bradbury-spying/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Limited hang out
Junior lets us peek in one pocket then tells us it's the only one he has. No surprise here. I've been under surveillance for decades and i'm sure there's no warrant attached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. NGIA (NGA) collecting data, 133 U.S. cities, ID everyone, nationality, political affiliations
Are your tax dollars working overtime, identifying your political affiliations?

=========================================
DIA SPYING: NGIA collecting data, 133 U.S. cities, ID everyone, nationality, political affiliations
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x983282

Campaign 2004: Were Bush / Cheney / NSA illegal wiretaps spying on Dems?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x925247
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Shell game, def 1 a common form of gambling involving 3 walnut
Edited on Sat Jun-09-07 03:45 PM by HereSince1628
shells and one pea. The object being to identify the shell covering the pea after the shells are shuffled on a table.

def 2. a form of hiding ballistic US missles also known as MX mobile missle. Missles were shuffled along a circular trackway and placed in one of many possible bunkers. The object was to increase uncertainty of the weapons location and thereby the cost to the enemy of eliminating launching sites by first strike.

def 3. a form of administrative deceit implemented by the Cheney administration to increase the cost of Congressional oversight in terms of effort, money and time. In the early 21st century this practice effectively allowed the paranoid Neoconservative administration to operate with no accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. The WH has always referred to programs in the plural.
Nice to have testimonial confirmation.

When will they do something about it?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...---...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. 509,000 mostly domestic names on another FBI list of terrorists
thanks to the pioneering efforts of John Edgar and his everloving Clyde:argh:

A damn RW Republican politburo/gestapo within a totally corrupted DoJ-and the building bears the name of John Edgar Hoover:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC