Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's 2007, why do people not have their children GPS tagged?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:25 PM
Original message
It's 2007, why do people not have their children GPS tagged?
With the horrible things that happen to children in this world and the technology available, why are children not fitted with an electronic locater of some fashion? This seems to be a simple thing to do in this day and age. Why is this not done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. the most important legacy we can bequeath our children...
...is the ability to hide and disappear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why don't people get themselves tagged?
And do the corporatocracy's job for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh Yeah...let's have everyone tagged and radio tracked from birth.
It's for our own good.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm glad it wasn't when I was a kid.
Unless of course the signal wasn't picked up by mom or dad.

I was constantly going places I shouldn't have gone...haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because they are human beings and not dolphins? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I met a dolphin once.
I should be so lucky to be one. Maybe next time around. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Dolphins are good people... err dolphins.
You know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a good idea
but it's a slippery slope.

For instance why not have CCTV cameras everywhere, why not hand in a DNA sample to a central govt database? Etc. etc.

A microchipped and trackable population would be a dream come true for the NWO/BFEE/PTB/MIC (whatever you want to call it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder if that would be a false sense of security plus
another reason not to teach your children the facts of real life, let the machine watch them for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. it would be a false sense of security -- Too much trust to a government
That is nothing more than a feeding ground for corporate information sharing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because such security is not worth what's sacrificed in return.
I want my children to be safe, but I also want them to learn independence and freedom. If we 'train' our children to be tagged and tracked, when they become adults, they'll let anyone do it to them. Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why not do Big Brother's job for him?
Then he won't have to do it for himself. :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redphish Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. They do make GPS locators that the kids can carry.
Although I'm sure they would be "lost" before very long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Maybe they'd take better care of it if it was their cell phone too...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Heck, my DOG has a GPS chip. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. People should teach their kids to
Sit
Stay
Speak
Roll Over

... and wag their tails.


After all, the Hiltons did.
:silly: :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. HAH! Love it!
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

It simply amazes me how many people are willing to give into the hysteria, sacrificing their children to the ever growing police state, all for the perception of greater security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. You ARE Bad
I love that in a person. :rofl:

Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. gps? or just a rfd?
there aren't gps chips yet are there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. If it's an implanted chip, it's RFID. GPS collars are available but expensive n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. see #30 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. My neighbor works for a local university on a chip project.
I believe it is a military contract about force identification (she won't say, exactly).

So Seamus has this chip at the base of his neck and I have this thing that looks like a large flip-phone that will direct me right to him just like that thing in my car that I never use.

Maybe they are just trying to keep track of me, as we are basically inseparable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Just think. No more MIA.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. That's why she let us in on it.
I have told her tales of extractions 'way back in the days of yore and my dog tends to bolt during boat races on the Bay (long story). I have found him miles from home and endured several eye-rolling freakouts by my better half.

So my neighbor took him to work with her one day and brought him back, tagged (or chipped or whatever). Pretty danged impressive. It will walk me right up to him, give or take a few yards.

I believe Special Forces are employing this system in the ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. Wow.
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. A GPS chip?
or an RFID chip?

If your dog escaped, you could track him anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. see #30, just above in the thread. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because then the UFOs can find them and suck them up into their saucer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because they don't wish to give into the national hysteria,
Thus enabling the ongoing creep of the American police state.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. It is done, though the devices are rarely implanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wow
...maybe because they don't want their children tracked by the government? Maybe because they fear Big Brother. Maybe because they are involved parents and keep an eye on them? Maybe because they don't think of their children as cattle? Maybe because we don't live under fascism yet?
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yeah, that whole privacy, freedom to explore the world and learn
from your mistakes, be your own person, and individual rights thing is so last century. Hell, who needs a GPS system when you can just keep them on a leash?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. Poverty for starters n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. They Have Them. Or Things Similar Anyway. But It's An Expensive Service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think it would simply add one more gruesome step to an abduction.
If they are implanted, say, an arm; the police would start finding arms at abduction sites. Or signs of primitive GPS removal surgery.
If your kid simply wandered off into the woods and got lost, it would be great. But, in the event of an abduction, it might actually place the child in immediate physical danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Because we're not paranoid freaks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. As Franklin said.......
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

the slippery slope argument wwas never more appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. maybe becasue they just want them to be children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Because it's open to use by people
other than parents. What a great way to ensure that any person could be tracked anywhere, anytime, during their lifetime!

Freedom from big brother.

This week I got a postcard announcing my 30th high school reunion. Interesting. I didn't attend the 10th or 20th, and don't remember getting a notification. I have no reason to go; I didn't know anyone in my graduating class. I didn't even attend the graduation. I had already moved on with my life.

I've lost track of all but one peer that I knew or spent time with during highschool, and we didn't live in the same town or attend the same school. I haven't seen anyone I spent time with in highschool for 6 years, and that was only for an afternoon at my ex' memorial service. I hadn't seen them for more than a decade before that.

How does a reunion committee find me, 30 years, 19 addresses, 2 states, and more than 1000 miles away from the graduation that I never attended?

It makes me feel vulnerable. Why would anyone want to violate their children's privacy for a lifetime?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. So, another vote for Big Brother Knows Where You Are, eh?
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 03:31 PM by WinkyDink
P.S. Kids could still be kidnapped and murdered; just found dead faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
37. You know, I'm 44 years old...
...and I have never met or heard about someone that I know having a "horrible thing" happening to them or their child. I would kinda think that I would have by now, if it's true that so many horrible things happen to children. I don't live a sheltered life by any means, and I live in New York City.

Granted, I can read in the news about horrible things happening to children, but how come I've never met anyone who dealt with that? Maybe because it's not as big a deal as the TV news and movies and tabloids would have you believe? Maybe because the media makes its money by creating controversy where very little actually exists?

I would never implant anything into a kid to assuage my own paranoia. You probably shouldn't either. But, that's your choice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I haven't met any either, but I don't know all that many people that raise children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
43. During my paranoid mother stage when my kids were little,
I thought about and actually researched this.

I have since learned to relax and not let fear guide my life or the lives of my kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC