Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Justice Official Blasts Gonzales

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:30 PM
Original message
Former Justice Official Blasts Gonzales
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/washington/washington/entries/2007/06/09/former_justice.html

Former Justice Official Blasts Gonzales

By Rebecca Carr | Saturday, June 9, 2007, 02:39 PM

As Senate Democrats press Republicans to support a no-confidence resolution against Attorney General Alberto Gonzales tomorrow, a former senior Justice Department official says the attorney general ran the department like “a political arm of the White House.”

Daniel J. Metcalfe, the former director of the Justice Department’s Office of Information and Privacy, said he resigned in January because he could no longer tolerate the “sheer political expediency, avoidance of individual responsibility, defensive personal aggrandizement, irresponsible ‘consensus’ decisionmaking (and) disregard for longstanding practices and principles.”

And that was before the controversy erupted over the firing of nine U.S. attorneys last year.

Metcalfe, who worked for the department during the the Nixon administration’s infamous “Saturday night massacre,” said the dismissals had been handled like nothing he has ever seen before.

“I think the way in which the firings themselves were handled was abominable, the way in which the ensuing controversy was handled was abysmal, and the way in which Gonzales has handled himself is absolutely appalling,” Metcalfe said. “As a long-term Justice Department official, I am embarrassed and increasingly incensed that he is still in there.”

Extensive excerpts from the interview are available at www.coxwashington.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish more former DOJ officials would speak up! I remember very clearly that several career lawyers
resigned after Gonzales took over.

Thanks for posting this -- recommended!

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if Conyers or Leahy will call Mecalfe to testify?
I know Gonzo is to testify again sometime this month. At SOME POINT, even the Pubs will have to admit Gonzo is an AH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't be shy, Metcalfe, tell us how you feel!
Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HML Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. We must destroy Alberto Gonzales
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 01:19 AM by HML


We must destroy Alberto Gonzales
(Politically speaking of course.)

Let’s face it, most voters are stupid, uninformed, and uneducated. Democracy is a hopelessly flawed system, but the illusion of democracy helps to keep the little people happy and make them feel empowered. Society would be better off if it were controlled by an enlightened and educated liberal elite (like us).

The right-wing Neocons are evil, conservatism is evil, corporations are evil, and profit is bad. Capitalism is bad too. We are justified in using all methods at our disposal to keep good progressive-minded people in power. The use of multiple votes, coerced votes from the cognitively challenged, coerced votes from the mentally challenged, and from felons too are all important to us. Coerced votes from “undocumented residents” are also essential to the survival of our movement, especially in close elections. The creative counting of votes in an election is also justified given the importance of our noble progressive political struggle.

Just look at the example of Washington State in the 2004 elections. If not for the bold and daring work of many dedicated Seattle area progressives, especially in the large King County (Seattle) area, Washington State would now not only have a Republican governor, but the state would have an honest and ethical governor as well. Such an event might have destroyed the powerful progressive political machine we have created in western Washington.

We must be careful not to acknowledge these election efforts publicly as it could destroy our advantage. When allegations of election cheating are made against our side, we should immediately claim that this is a nonexistent problem and just a smokescreen for Republican cheating. Always bring up the word Diebold in such discussions. Anytime harsher laws are proposed to prevent election tampering we must oppose them claiming they would disenfranchise legitimate voters, especially poor and minority voters. Remember this, whenever you can insert race into a discussion you can easily imply your opposition is racist, and thus win the argument.

Now comes the Shrub Justice Department under Alberto Gonzales. One of Shrub’s initiatives is to prosecute those caught tampering with elections. Shrub may be a stupid smirking chimp, but he knows that if tampering is discouraged to any great degree, the Republicans would gain a distinct advantage. The GOP Neocons do not have the same organized and concerted effort to win that we do. Cheating on behalf of the GOP is isolated, unorganized, and fragmented at best. They do not have the same fanatical desire to win, and most don’t feel it is right to cheat. The Neocons are too caught up in their Bible-thumping Christian conservative dogma to allow themselves to cheat in elections. We progressives are unencumbered by such silly notions of character and ethics. We are the early adopters of the modern concept of “situational ethics”.

Alberto Gonzales fired several US attorneys for not proactively prosecuting “election fraud” cases. We must destroy Alberto Gonzales before he can do any more damage. And we must be certain that his replacement will not attempt any similar election-cleanup jihad until we can put someone sympathetic to our progressive cause back in the White House.


(written by HML 6-10-07)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Take the sleazeball out, and then start issuing and ENFORCING subpoenas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC