Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Paris Hilton's jail time matters, and why we should pay close attention.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 12:54 AM
Original message
Why Paris Hilton's jail time matters, and why we should pay close attention.
Inevitable was the inane chatter about Paris Hilton's jail imbroglio, a blond ambition rudely stopped by California Superior Court Judge Michael Sauer's order for her to return to jail. We can't get enough Schadenfreude from Paris' demise, much like we couldn't get enough of Britney's meltdown earlier this year. We eat famous towheads for lunch, and one wealthy by birthright and sporting a vapid public image like Paris provided extra gravy that satiated us for a day, at least. Who needs to worry about one's own problems when we have Paris' anguish to feast off?

Why do we care about Paris? Closet intellects have wondered this ever since her first splash in the public eye, the wealthy hotel heiress whose dirty bedroom romp appeared on the internet "by accident." Paris is her own creation, but the same public that developed a love fascination with "Dynasty" and "Dallas" couldn't keep their eyes off this aristocratic celebrity. She's the unattainable "other side" of America that we don't see from our apartments and modest homes. Of beautiful clothes and lavish parties. Of an otherwise average looking girl who is beautiful because she can pay for it. We watched her like a train wreck in Prada, waiting (hoping, perhaps) that the shameless self-promoter would crash one day, licking our lips over the smoldering remains.

So when the ballyhoo spectacle that was Paris' jail sentence came to life, we immediately divided into three camps: those who feasted, those who clucked their tongues, and those who couldn't care less.

And for those who clucked their tongues, many of whom were the same closet intellects who asked why we cared about Paris in the first place, the prevailing question was, "Aren't there more important issues out there?" But the obvious answer - a resounding "YES!" - masks a greater lesson, that of holding attention-craving narcissists like Paris accountable for their actions, and that of our own hypocrisy in criticizing those who actually care about it all.

Allow me now to make a rather clumsy transition into another form of narcissism: the Bush Administration. The war. The lies. The pure contempt for our governing system and our intellect. George Bush is another product of wealth that achieved public power that has not yet been held accountable for his actions. He is Paris Hilton without the trial, the crying and the anguish. He's never been questioned, this male Marie Antoinette. And worst yet - he's supposed to be the president of our nation.

Let's fantasize a bit, shall we? A Texas criminal court judge hovers over a quivering 26 year-old George W. Bush. It's a warm summer day in 1972. George, Sr., and Barbara sit in the court room benches behind him, sniffling. He violated probation for yet another DWI (perhaps while he was AWOL in Alabama), and this time his father failed to pull the right strings for George. So now he must face the effect of his actions. The judge orders little George to jail.

"It's not fair!" he cries to Barbara as a bailiff escorts him from the court room. Pictures show a despondent George wailing in the back of a police car. George the Failure. George Who Never Could Best His Father. George the Jailbait.

Was this all Bush needed? A shock to the system? The knowledge that, yes indeed, he may one day have to answer to authority? To the law? And that the law applies to him, the Son of George? Maybe. Maybe the Paris Hilton light occupying the White House simply needed a kick in the pants. Perhaps he wouldn't have felt the need to run at all. But that's not germane to the "more important issues" facing us, right?

Once again the public enters the stage. Our own power, as voters and as consumers, makes or breaks celebrities and politicians alike. We post everyday (this writer, sadly included) about the need for Bush to pay for his criminal actions in Iraq but don't speak out where it matters - on the streets. We don't take control of our democracy and push for a change. We don't yell en masse. We don't picket. It's not a matter of money. Does one Paris Hilton truly outweigh the voices of a thousand screaming Americans?

And yet here we are, watching on a very small scale the very accountability that must happen on a large scale. Complain all you want about the attention we give to Paris Hilton. We should learn from it and move our attentions to Washington, DC, where sits a person well deserving of even greater punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I went to jail for a DUI violation....
Here in Orange County (right next to LA) you do 66% percent of your time. So I did 20/30 days.


In LA, you do 10% of your time. So she actually did the amount of time that anyone else would have whens he was first released. She is now being treated UNFAIRLY because of her celebrity. Dont get me wrong, she deserved her sentence. Celebrities should be treated no better, or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Keith O. had a good lawyer on basically saying the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Writer's point is supported here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Both Cheney and W chose to ignore our DUI laws
Why they were ever elected is say a mystery, or corporate money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. A narcissist is a milder form of a psychopath...
..George W. Bush is a full-blown psychopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. who is narcissist
and a rich brat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Actually I think you're both correct.
Both George and Paris are narcissists. Bill Clinton was one, too, in some respects. However Bush is of the more malignant variety (sociopathic) which makes him especially dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MatrixEscape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. On that note ...
If you have any desire to potentially go down the rabbit hole that the above post points to, then prepare yourself for a long read and some rather puzzling but potentially fruitful excursions out of the control matrix ... or deeper into it, depending on your personal perspective.

http://www.sensiblyeclectic.com/news/index.php?/archives/5507-On-Becoming-Comfortably-Unplugged.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Great read!
Thank you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes. The transition was clumsy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Jeus, I love how people attempt to connect Hilton to Bush
You have a beautiful writing style, but give us all a break. She's a 25 year old socialite who got a jail sentence. Can we get another essay on why Mel Gibson's racist comments point out the connection between Bush and the Israeli conflict?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Everyone wants to draw a parallel
You are so bloody right. Paris is one subject, Bush is another. Powerful writing does not need to use devices to string the topics together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Wow. That was the most complimentary disagreement I've ever experienced!
;)

Thanks for the feedback, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Actually, the subject is narcissim and accountability; Paris and Bush
are examples. Those who want to draw parallels are entirely within their right to do so, as well as 100% spot on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe the importance
lies in figuring out WHY there is so much attention.
I happen to believe it was so apparent that there is a two tiered justice system, one for the rich and one for the rest of us.
This was an injustice the public responded to and Democrats would be wise to recognize that.

People may not be out in the streets but most everyone is becoming aware of the injustice that permeates our government now. Democratic politicians who can address that loudly and firmly will have an audience - that is what the PH debacle has demonstrated. The people are ready.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Nearly all issues end up in the same tangled ball of wool
Several years ago the corporation that controlled much of our waterfront activity decided to fire all the union wharfies and replace them with non-union contractors. The wharfies put on a spectacular strike.

Very little cargo got into or out of the Port of Melbourne. The lads picketed the docks, sleeping out, manning the lines 24/7. Many people, to show their solidarity with these workers, hiked down to offer financial and moral support. I was one of them.

What's this got to do with the original topic? Down at the docks, every group with a barrow to push had set up a stall. Selling stickers, asking for money. There were the save the dolphins/rainforests/whales. There were pro-choicers, GLBT rights, East Timor supporters, anti-Nazis and Greenpeace. I don't disagree with any of their platforms. Now, I love a good demo as well as the next person but THIS WAS NOT THE TIME OR PLACE.

It is one thing to be left wing and support a cause, but quite another to be opportunistic and jump on the cause that is garnering the current media attention and use it as a jump-up for a completely different agenda. If I were to be honest, this is my main gripe against leftist politics; the inability to prioritise and focus on an issue until it is dealt with then move on to the next.

So, to attempt to draw a parallel between PH and GWB is a stretch.In much the same way that any of those assorted group who rode the coat-tails of the wharfies desired fame by association. It is not honest, it distracts from a genuine message and is playing straight into the hands of those who appear to set the media 'rules'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Maybe I was not clear
It would not be appropriate for Democratic politicians to debate the paris Hilton mess.
What IS smart though is to recognize a nerve in the American people that has been exposed.

The Democratic party is about justice and fairness. Part of being a good politican is being able to read the mood of the people. If this incident has revealed anything it is the fact that people are becoming tuned in to injustice. All I was saying is the people will listen if the Dem politicos can make their case about fairness at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. "If this incident has revealed anything...
it is the fact that people are becoming tuned in to injustice."

BINGO!

But stop relying on the political institution to do your work for you. Make a sign and head to DC. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. I addressed this in a roundabout way...
Some of us are driven by the need to claim the spotlight, to be the center of attention. People will go on TV and tolerate the damnedest things for their promised fifteen minutes of fame. They'll eat worms, engage in astounding acts of folly, and willingly subject themselves to public humiliation to get a few minutes of camera time.

People will sign up to bare their lives and their souls on the stage of the Jerry Springer show, or strip down for a public flogging on Judge Judy, exposing themselves to the dubious mercy of a creature that makes me shudder just thinking about her.

All over the world, kids dream of making it as a rock or pop star, or gracing the small or big screen with their presence. Some kids dream of dancing, or acting on the stage. The best of these are driven by a need to practice an art, but others just want to see their name in lights, or to hear the screams of an adoring crowd.

Some people grow so desperate to be known that they will commit acts of unspeakable evil to gain notoriety, if they cannot gain the attention of the masses in any other way.

More:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Mythsaje
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. That's what struck me - bush is the Paris Hilton of politics.
And yes, he ABSOLUTELY is well-deserving of even greater punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. the "male Marie Antoinette"...
Good one!

I have to believe the day is coming when the public will demand accountability and "move our attentions to Washington, DC, where sits a person well deserving of even greater punishment."

I have to believe it. That is what keeps me going. Someday an 'awake' America will be paying attention and reclaiming her democracy. It will be messy. The road will be bumpy and the price very high for the crimes done in our name... but, it is necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. The punishment of losing yourself ...
to self-deceit is more than enough. George is done, finished, complete.
The cheap thrills of the Olbermann's ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. If paris hilton had been Shaniqua Jones
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 06:21 AM by SoCalDem
she would have been handcuffed on the spot, taken to the jail, and would still be sitting there waiting for a public defender ..she would have had her kids(if any) put into foster care, lost her job (if she had one), had her car impounded, had her license revoked,..and her place (if she had one) would have been gone over with a fine toothed comb (drugs might have been "found" there..and by the time she went to court, she would probably have been found guilty and sentenced to do some hard time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. Paris and Martha get jailed. George, Dick and friends remain gleefully free from accountability
The white wealthy male establishment continues its war on everyone else who doesnt like or want to participate in their wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. Kick for the morning crowd.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why the mods don't move every debutante thread straight to the Lounge is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. apparently the lounge started very few of our own
I think they should just about have started a temporary GD:Hilton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. It will only matter when its bush, dick, rove and rummy sharing a 4 bed cell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Uh-huh. And this begins, when?
Sorry, I'm in a particularly cynical mood today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. I was trying not to follow it, or her
However, I felt like I wanted to read your opinion on this matter.

I have, however, taken it to the streets - protesting the upcoming war in Feb. of 2003, protesting a Bush visit to KCMO in July 2003 and protesting a Bush visit to Manhattan, Ks in Feb. 2005. I have also taken it to the 'information super-highway' (a term which is no longer in vogue, and with LTTEs and GOTV work to defeat a Republican congresscritter in 2006.

To me though, it is not so much about holding him accountable, notwithstanding that he is a sock-puppet for an interest-group (as he, himself, is reported to have questioned his 2nd huge tax cut for the rich in 2003). It is about stopping further damage, undoing the damage that has been done, and preventing damage from the rest of the Republican a$$holes.

Screaming is not an answer though. Hysteria is not a strong argument for alot of people. It suggests somebody trying to have their way through violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. amazing. never would have seen the link, but there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC