Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

40 years ago today it was illegal for blacks to marry whites in at least 17 states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:31 PM
Original message
40 years ago today it was illegal for blacks to marry whites in at least 17 states
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 01:42 PM by NNN0LHI
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/422338,CST-NWS-loving11.article

Love reigned Supreme in 1967
MILFORD, VA. | Court tossed out bans on black-white marriages

June 11, 2007
BY DIONNE WALKER

MILFORD, Va. -- Reporters no longer beat a path to the house just over the Caroline County border -- and that's fine with its owner, a soft-spoken 67-year-old who never wanted the fame her marriage brought her.

Born Mildred Jeter, she's known mostly by the name she took when she -- a black woman living in segregated Virginia -- dared break the rules by marrying a white man named Richard Loving.

The union landed the Lovings in jail, and then before the U.S. Supreme Court, and finally in the history books; 40 years ago Tuesday, the court ruled in favor of the couple, overturning laws prohibiting interracial unions and changing the face of America. snip

It was in this setting that Mildred and Richard met. Their relationship took an abrupt turn when she became pregnant at 18.
They drove some 80 miles to Washington, D.C., in 1958, married, and returned to Central Point.

''I think he thought {if} we were married, they couldn't bother us,'' Mildred said.

Within a month, they were arrested. They spent years living in exile in Washington after being convicted of ''cohabiting as man and wife, against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth.'' Laws banning mixed marriages existed in at least 17 states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. are you saying (by omission) that it was legal for a white man to
marry a black woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. not marry but rape yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No the subject line wasn't big enough to get it all in n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
militaryspouse Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ..
If anyone hasn't seen the movie MR. and Mrs.Loving, I recommend it. Timmothy Hutton, and Rashan(sorry, messed up the name) played the role as mr. and ms. loving. Very good movie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. The actress that potrayed Mildred Loving was Leila Rochon...
This is something that is close to my heart as I'm a caramel woman married to a tall Texan Bohemian Czech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. actually your subject line would be shorter --
just drop the words male and female....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nia Zuri Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. He was white, she was black
It was illegal for whites and blacks to marry, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. thank you !!!
i hate it when sexism and racism are NOT separated...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Can you say more so I can understand what you mean?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. But but but IT WAS THE LAW!
What part of illegal don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. The law was found to be unconstitutional. That too, is the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. What if.....
they were both mixed race, but one spouse appeared white, at first glance? And the other appeared black?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The one drop rule
Remember the old musical "Show Boat"? The whole premise of it was a white man who fell in love with a black woman. Just before the sheriff came to arrest them, the hero had his lady cut her finger and he drank a drop of blood from it. When the sheriff came, he said, "I'm not white. I have black blood in me!" and the sheriff left them alone. That would be what would have happened in the case you cited. In VA, one DROP of "Negro blood" made you black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. May I say that you have one heck of a good memory?
Because you do.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. No, I read The Straight Dope
and Cecil Adams discussed this. But thanks for the compliment! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Indeed
A superb memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rule of law! Rule of law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder how hard it would be
to get a law like that changed in today's political environment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You'd probably be accused of supporting sex offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. if they had the supreme court we have today.....
...the ban on mixed marriages would not have been overturned. clarence thomas would have even supported the mixed marriage ban and it would have been a 5-4 decision. the lovings would still be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. I remember Life Magazine
having a feature story about a "mixed marriage"- I still remember their wonderment that some of the kids were dark and others very light. The whole feel of the piece was like a photo/article about aliens from Mars or something. There was a feeling of strangeness and an undercurrent of danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. We're really not very far from amoeba, are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. San Francisco TURNED on Willie Mays when he married a white woman.
I was only a kid but I remember hearing my family talking about it at the table. Not sure if it was at the tail end of the 50s or very early 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. I hope it doesn't take another 40 years for same sex couples to be able to marry
But then it just might if the bigots have their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. While social progress may move relatively slow in the U.S., it does move.
While social progress may move relatively slow in the U.S., it does move. From abject slavery, to Jim Crow, to integration, to where we are now, and to where we will (hopefully) be tomorrow. There has been real progress (which isn't to say there's no more left to be made).

I believe this applies to most social movements-- the ERA, the safety of the common worker, and welfare laws to name but a few. We move, we just move slowly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC