Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

so if 17+ Repuke Senators vote no confidence against Gonzo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:15 PM
Original message
so if 17+ Repuke Senators vote no confidence against Gonzo
Would the House try to impeach Gonzo???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. no. but they should impeach regardless of the vote.
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 04:20 PM by endarkenment
Impeachment should be initiated based on reasonable suspicion that high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed. An impeachment proceeding is an investigation. The political consideration that the republican creeps would not vote against one of their own if he were caught having sex with an underage baboon really should not matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and when it fails, you will be happy about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Absolutely- stand up and put it on the record....
Fighting hypocritical Republicans is much better than looking cowardly- even if it's not successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Agreed. Man-up, Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yes I will be happy that we tried to do the right thing.
So far our opposition party's return to power has committed itself to nothing. It has not once attempted to take a risk. This last exercise in futility: the non binding lack of confidence vote being a perfect example. We risked defeat for nothing! Good show. Had we somehow won, absolutely nothing would have been achieved. Like the non-binding Iraq war bills, we managed to destroy our credibility without even a chance at actually winning anything of value. One has to ask whose side exactly are our leaders on, and I think the answer is obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I suspect that while they MIGHT vote "no confidence"
They would not vote to impeach.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. The house then votes on no confidence tomorrow?
it is a joint no confidence vote as I understand the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just remember- a 'No Confidence Vote'
is historically unprecedented. It will be a huge slap of the admin. if we pull it off.
Bush will go to below 20% approval or something embarrassing like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Censure, sure, anything that gives the appearance of oversight by GOP
but all the while had their heads in their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Since he wasn't elected- and was appointed by bush
I didn't think he could be impeached, fired maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, he can be impeached
all executive officers subject to senate approval can be impeached, as well as judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. wrong. see the constitution.
Cabinet officers are impeachable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Vote on 'no confidence' failed 53-38 this just in
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 06:34 PM by EVDebs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC