Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Cheney's staff intensely interested in intel suggesting Iran arming Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:57 PM
Original message
Newsweek: Cheney's staff intensely interested in intel suggesting Iran arming Taliban

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19001199/site/newsweek/

<snip>

In the last few weeks, Cheney's staff have unexpectedly become more active participants in an interagency group that steers policy on Afghanistan, according to an official familiar with the internal deliberations. During weekly meetings of the committee, known as the Afghanistan Interagency Operating Group, Cheney staffers have been intensely interested in a single issue: recent intelligence reports alleging that Iran is supplying weapons to Afghanistan's resurgent Islamist militia, the Taliban, according to two administration officials who asked for anonymity when discussing internal meetings.



check out the headlines coming out of the MSM over the past week... It's deja vu all over again :crazy:



Document: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/06/document_iran_c.html

Iran aids Afghanistan, but may have helped Taliban too: NATO general

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/11/asia/AS-GEN-Afghan-Iran.php

Iran is arming Taliban, U.S. envoy claims

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19190994


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. cheney's staff intensely interested in fixing more intel
If it does not say what dick wants then they'll just fix it. Incredibly amazing how much a war monger a chickenhawk can become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here we go again ... same old shit again ... marching down the avenue ...
bombing Iran before we're through. :grr: :nuke: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't you just know that this possibility has Cheney walking around
with a hard on? Nothing gets him turned on like the possibility of war, death, and destruction. Think of all the no-bid contracts! Yippee!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I must say the whole Iran arming the taliban did catch me by surprise
they are getting more creative.... they = neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Again, Bush shows he a uniter, not a divider.
I take any news of Iran helping the Talibani with a fat grain of salt. But that said, it does make a certain logistical sense for them to tie down American forces wherever they can.

I'll suggest that given the political mess that is Iran, it's much more likely that there are rogue factions within Iran doing this (the quasi-fascist Quds Force is suspect number one) rather than a deliberated policy. It makes mroe sense for Iran to patch up their differences with the Sadrists in Baghdad, but then there's no reason Iran can't help tie down US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is probably payback for the US supporting Sunni dissidents in southeast Iran and and Iraqi Kurd support for Kurdish separatists in northwest Iran.

While any Iranian support for the Talibani monsters is horrible and morally repugnant, it's not exactly unprovoked.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, duh.
:boring:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who is this "diplomat" Nicholas Burns? Is he another 33-year-old
with an oversized title?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. He's the guy in the State Department to keep Rice on her toes.
And to advance the neocon agenda.

To make a long story short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. hey-- we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud...
...do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Iran selling its Oil in Euros = Iran arming Taliban

It's neocon math.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Correctamundo!!
This game is to manipulate supply and demand and Iran isn't playing with the Sauds, Chenney and their other cronnies, thus they need to be shut down one way or another.

It's more the threat to Iran's oil that works for these crooks right now as any sabre rattling will make the price of oil jump and they all go to the bank. Uncertainty and instability are the keys to "maximizing profits" here and that's the only endgame this regime has played in that region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cheney's staff at the direction of Darth Vader just like in the Libby/Plame case
never ending war is the goal of the neocons......great portfolios all. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. In 2001, Iran offered to help the US by closing its border with Afghanistan
to ensure that the Taliban would not escape via the west. The Iranians could not have been thrilled to have the US fighting a war on its doorstep, but they were less thrilled with having the Taliban over there.

Of course, since then, they have the US fighting a war on two of its borders, and maybe they've calculated that the Taliban can't win, but they can continue to be a thorn in the US's side. How different the world would have been if the US had taken Iran's overtures seriously in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Prepare for War
Cheney is on the war path
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Cheney's staff busy making up intel to suggest that Iran is arming
Taliban...

Jesus H. Kriste -- is the media going to fall for this shit again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shi ites arming Sunnis?
I wonder if there is yellow cake involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC