Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eric Boehlert: The Media's Assult on Reason

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 08:02 PM
Original message
Eric Boehlert: The Media's Assult on Reason
Boehlert did a great book called Lapdogs of the Press last year. it was so spot on and well written. Not much said about it: surprise! Guess he made the media mad.
In his column on Media Matters he takes down the press and their attack on who else: Al Gore and his new book.

How hard is it to figure out if a book has footnotes? When it comes to Al Gore's new, national bestseller, The Assault on Reason (Penguin Press, May 2007), it's trickier than you think for some disdainful members of the Beltway press corps.

On June 10, The Washington Post published an opinion column by Andrew Ferguson about Gore's new book. Personally, I give The Assault on Reason high marks as a spot-on, truth-telling critique of the Bush administration, as well as for the insightful concern Gore expresses about the fragile state of American democracy. Or, "what passes for a national conversation," as Gore puts it.

Not surprisingly though, Ferguson, an editor at the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard, disliked the book, waving it off as "a sprawling, untidy blast of indignation."

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200706120005?f=h_column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seriously, when did that style of footnoting become popular?
I noticed the same thing with Kerry's new book (This Moment on Earth), where I initially made the mistake of thinking he hadn't footnoted (which made no sense, so I looked in the back and there they were).

So now I see the same thing with Assault on Reason and I am just wondering when this style started?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hate to say it, but I think it is "dumbed down" printing style...
Publishers have discovered that most people don't want the clutter of seeing little numbers on the page and/or they don't want to guilty that they don't want flip back to read the footnotes...

I don't think it was Al's choice, I presume that the publisher strongly recommended it so that the "public" would be more likely to read the book.

Anyone who insists on thinking critically - and who wants footnotes so they can check the sources - will just have to know to look at the back of the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC