MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:43 AM
Original message |
*** Lurita Doan Lies again to Waxman Again ** Thread 2 |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
1. she appears proud to be lying |
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Did you post this link in thread #1? |
|
I kept refreshing, but there were no new posts.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Just did, had to create the thread first. : ) |
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Duh. I'm an idiot. Sorry. |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yes or No answer, and she can't do it |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
20. Oh, she CAN. But that wouldn't eat up the time. ;) |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Original message |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
7. BOY she is arguing. . hostile hostile hostile. . |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Drinking terms: "Fully", "context", "ability", "speculate". Cheers!! |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
9. trade rags, freudian slip |
DemReadingDU
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Can I be the first one to smack her upside the head? |
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Only if I get to go second. |
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Does anyone have a link to the POWERPOINT ???? |
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
119. Thanks. It certainly is political and enlightening. MUST SEE |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
16. She admits she was represented by her 'personal counsel' at the time she was testifying before IG... |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. awww, poor baby. She was persecuted from day one. |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
17. why is she still head of GSA>??? |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. "Heckuva job, Doanie!" |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
26. chimpy has full confidence in her and gonzo |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
19. She says the report is full of 'leaps and inaccuracies' ... |
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
The historical analysis and the "ideological shift" slides are utter nonsense. The conclusions aren't even supported, statistically, be the data that's right there on the same slide. GAC
|
nascar55
(251 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
beginning. I see were they subpoenaed White House officials, this is getting good. They are all so in denial.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Does she know that the OSC is stacked with Bush appointees? |
JTFrog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
24. What the F difference does it make |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM by JTFrog
when the performace reviews took place? That doesn't mean she can't threaten to not give them bonuses or advances in the future. What the hell is her point?
|
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Poor little Lurita, she's being picked on by everyone, where's the Wahmbulance?? |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message |
28. ahahahaahaha! "I'm sorry. I'm losing it" |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
29. Parlimentary inquiry by Mica, douche bag, wasting time |
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. Mica has no idea what a parliamentary inquiry is. |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
34. bang! bang! bang! bang! bang! that gavel! |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:56 AM
Original message |
Bang it again! PLEASE! Thirty seconds was about five minutes ago! |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
30. Good Lord, here we go again! Mica has crap coming out of his mouth. |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
32. Mica moaning about wapo leak . .claiming parliamentary ..Waxman hammering |
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
33. Do you have the direct Congress link? n/t |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
36. You know they're desperate when they go to these lengths to hold up the hearing. |
nascar55
(251 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
47. That's all that was intended to do. Complete and total bullshit... |
|
the Government Reform and Oversight Committee didn't receive any information on this until it was published in the WaPo.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Mica: "This is a 3-ring circus." Waving the WPost around. Wants an investigation of the staff for |
|
some "leak". "I want an investigation."
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
43. "In fifteen years! Fifteen years!" Clearly, he was persona non gratis |
|
during investigations of the Clinton administration.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
46. Yea it's a 3 ring circus, and Mica is the ringmaster! n/t |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
38. I swear -- this is pissing me off to no end! STFU Mica |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
39. Hey Mica, what if it was KKKarl and his pals that leaked it |
|
to sink Good Ship Lurita?
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
60. ROFLMAO!! He'd shut up so fast his lips would fuse together! n/t |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
41. Repubs had to have some kind of strategy to divert attention and obfuscate...enter R-Mica |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
42. Funny how the PLAME leak was A-okay to these traitors. |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
44. Doan "GSA is Not a partisan agency" |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
52. 3 meets expectations but gets no bonus. |
JTFrog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
|
enough of the BS diversions already. Who gave the damn mic back to Tom?
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message |
48. Davis back up..(not sure how he got there) |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
53. talking about employee evaluations (diversionary bs) |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
54. "they may feel" -- talk about LEADING questions Davis |
|
DAMN! Ask THEM how they felt and don't project or drop it!
|
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message |
56. Someone went out of the way to embarass employees by inserting names into the document. |
Oilwellian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
57. I love how she blames the OSP for smearing the employees |
|
when in fact it was she who smeared them because of their testimony to the OSP against her.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
58. Who is this Davis creep? |
|
Are there pictures of him with a goat?
|
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
64. Alas, he is my Congressman |
|
Tom Davis R-VA11
Hey he looks good today. He even combed his hair, maybe he isn't hung over today.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
117. My heart goes out to you. |
sazemisery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
59. Why does she remember events when Repugs ask but.. |
|
"Don't recall" when Democrats ask?
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
62. she hasn't been 'forgetting' as much as 'denying' |
|
no i didn't everybody's picking on me
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
68. Well, when the Cons are doing the prepping ... |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
61. Davis: OSC interviews were tainted by previously testimony. |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
63. rehash of his first statement blah blah blah blah |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
65. Lurita LOVES the republican questioners |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
78. She has trouble hearing the Democrats' questions |
|
"Could you repeat that?" again and again and again eating up time
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
105. Lurida Lurita. In the opinion of one Republican dummy, a psepholigical |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:30 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
factor she expressed as a percentage would not be technical. Kind of an anecdotal opinion proferred by a novice to politics and electionering.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
66. Where the hell are the other Democrats? (mica up again) |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
67. Too many Republicans for my taste. Now Mica: "fishing expedition", blah, blah, blah. |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:04 AM by WinkyDink
And oddly enough, Doan was succinct just now: "No."
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
69. What rock did Mica crawl out from under? |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
74. I don't know, but the rock is mighty relieved! |
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #74 |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
|
what a bogus series of questions and prepared answers
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
71. Man they sure play up the race card - Mica |
|
"You're a minority, a woman, and they are after you."
|
sabra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
72. Mica is disgusting! Trying to link the investigation with Doan being a woman |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
73. finally Cummings (D- Md) up |
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #73 |
76. She is so fucking rude! |
|
Reading while he's questioning her
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #73 |
85. I think he was wrong to ask about an e-mail when she was a private citizen. |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
75. LOL! "I paid good money for this position" |
earthboundmisfit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
77. Cummings throwing statements from her previous testimony back at her |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
79. She is looking for help from the repukes |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
80. Cummings just walked her into an admission of Hatch Act violation |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
81. "Where do the mistakes end and the truth begins" -- Cummings D-Md |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
82. Urgent message from Karl? |
|
I can't say I ever recall watching a witness being given one of those pink message notes in the middle of their testimony before.
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #82 |
|
"I was a private citizen when I wrote that email."
LOL!
But she promised to "deliver" if she got the job.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
83. I just tuned in - what's this about? |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
84. Davis back up .. again are he and mica the only ones there? |
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
86. Is Davis allowed to do this????? eom |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
100. Apparently so! Makes him and the rest of them look bad, IMO |
|
Are they talking about her being African American?
Now Burton not only bringing up Plame, but Sandy Berger, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, etc. What the fuck is up with these people!
|
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
88. nitty gritty 10 times so far |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
89. Doan: I love black people |
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
90. Tom Davis is not interested in Justice only protecting |
|
the name of the Republicans... And there my friends lies the problem with this country... They don't see right and wrong, just Republican and Democrats....
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:13 AM
Original message |
|
Ms. Doan doesn't seem to get the gravity of this situation.
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
91. Davis kisses Doan-know's butt. |
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
92. oh burton..whipeeeeeeeeee..what scum bags rethugs are i can hardly watch this!! |
|
these people disgust me beyond words!!
fly
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
93. Doan is an Af Am so she has a big bullseye on her for the Dems. Yeah right! |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #93 |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #103 |
108. I know! Couldn't figure out wth they were talking about |
|
It's a ridiculous charge.
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #103 |
109. Af Am and you know how Dems target Af Ams. |
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
94. Let's bring up Sandy Berger.... |
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
95. Steven Hadley/Sandy Berger.. what's the diff? |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
96. Burton talking Berger/Plame crap again. . he's disgusting |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
97. WTF? This is all a big joke to the repigs. G'Dammit! |
sabra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
98. OMG! Attacking Sandy Berger, Plame, Gore, Clinton... |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
99. Burton stirs up Sandy Berger, Valerie Plame, Al Gore & buddhist temple, etc. |
|
He has not mentioned Doan --I guess that is consistent with their theme of not knowing why we are here.
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
101. Sandy Berger. Valerie Plame. Al Gore goes to a Buddist Temple. Bill Clinton |
|
but the Dems didn't want to hold hearing on that. Janet Reno.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
JTFrog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
broke the law? That's how this has got spun now???
|
windy252
(742 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #104 |
118. This tells me their desperate to distract from the current issue. (red herring) |
|
Whether anything will come out of this I don't know
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
106. Burton, let's list everything from 12 years ago to justify what is happening |
|
now. What do I call this--violation of THE HATCH ACT.
And what criminal act did Plame commit?
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
107. Clinton Officials violated the law hundreds of times says Burton. This is a witch hunt. |
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #107 |
110. Unfortunately, their histrionic and totally surreal witch-hunt of Bill Clinton |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:34 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
over a non-legal matter concerning his private life disqualifies their credibility in the same comprehensive measure.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
111. It's not that she should be allowed to answer the questions. She's under a binding obligation to |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:43 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
answer the questions.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
112. Was Davis implying Doane's a liar or an idiot, when he asked her if she had the |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:47 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
authority to retaliate? She specifically stated she would "retaliate". I can't think of another country in the world where you could find such idiots in the highest ranks of government, as these neocons.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
114. She doesn't know what the agenda of the enquiry is? Try "Finding out the truth |
|
concerning concerning their violation of the Hatch Act." Is that so difficult to understand?
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
115. When they allege all the Democratic members of the panel are politically motivated, |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 11:31 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
they should say, "Absolutely correct! It is SO helpful to establish the most basic facts. The beauty is that, if you are innocent of the offences enquired into, you can simply cite the FACTS. For the whole world to hear! If they have no case, holding up the investigators for the hopeless charlatans they are!
That's the beauty of a politically-motivated investigation. It gives both sides the perfect opportunity to establish the FACTS, to throw light on any unsubstantiated smears. The Democtrats can do their job as politicians, i.e. to go for weaknesses of the other side in terms of the criminality they evidently suspect; and the Republican defendants the perfect opportunity to demonstrate the innocence they would contend, of their actions.
It happened with the Starr and Clinton Special Prosecutor enquiry. Starr and his Republican cronies were held up to the contempt of the whole world, not because they were partisan, but because they were dishonestly partisan, incompetently partisan - nay cretinously partisan. That's the beauty of partisan-inspired investigations. They can go either way. According to where the truth lies.
So a good proportion of the insensate verbiage emanating from the neocons was utter, utter waffle and obscurantist bullshit.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-13-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
116. I would have said her lack of humility had been "chilling", rather than |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 11:34 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
"breath-taking". Such incredible arrogance aided and abetted by those neocons on the panel.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |