Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Veterans Write to RNC of Their Concern Over Republican Threat to Rule of Law (Plame)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:10 PM
Original message
CIA Veterans Write to RNC of Their Concern Over Republican Threat to Rule of Law (Plame)
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/23618

CIA Veterans Write to RNC of Their Concern Over Republican Threat to Rule of Law
Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2007-06-13 18:49. Media

13 June 2007
The Honorable Mel Martinez
General Chairman
The Republican National Committee
310 First Street, SE
Washington, D.C. 20003

As former intelligence officers—most of us have served the United States in undercover positions—we are saddened and appalled by the recent public comments of former Senator Fred Thompson, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and former Governor Mitt Romney—one a potential candidate and the other two declared candidates for the Republican nomination for President--with respect to the perjury and obstruction of justice conviction of Vice President Cheney’s Chief of Staff, Lewis “Scooter” Libby. These men misrepresent the case against Mr. Libby and call into question the integrity of a respected Federal Judge and U.S. attorney. Their positions with respect to the just and fair punishment meted out to Mr. Libby raise serious questions about their commitment to the rule of law free of partisan bias.

We are particularly concerned by the recent speech by Fred Thompson, who declared:

As you may recall, for some inexplicable reason, the CIA sent the husband of one of its employees to Niger on a sensitive mission. She had suggested it. He came back to the U.S. and proceeded to publicly blast the administration. Naturally, everyone wanted to know “who is this guy?” and “why was he sent to Niger?” Just as naturally, the fact that he was married to Valerie Plame at the CIA was leaked.

Having virtually guaranteed that Ms. Plame’s identity would be ultimately disclosed by using her, shall we say, “politically active” husband, the CIA then demanded that this leak of her name be investigated by the Justice Department for a possible violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. The Justice Department, bowing to political and media pressure, appointed a Special Counsel to investigate the leak and promised that the Justice Department would exercise no supervision over him whatsoever — a status even the Attorney General does not have.

The only problem with this little scenario was that there was no violation of the law, by anyone, and everybody — the CIA, the Justice Department and the Special Counsel knew it. Ms. Plame was not a “covered person” under the statute and it was obvious from the outset.

Furthermore, Justice and the Special Counsel knew who leaked Plames’s name and it wasn’t Scooter Libby. But the Beltway machinery was well oiled and geared up so the Special
Counsel spent the next two years moving heaven and earth to come up with something, anything. Finally he came up with some inconsistent recollections by Scooter Libby, who had been up to his ears studying National Intelligence Estimates. But he worked for Dick Cheney, so that apparently was enough for the special counsel.

The factual errors in Mr. Thompson’s statement are almost as egregious as his partisan view that perjury and obstruction of justice are not serious crimes. For example, Thompson states that there is something implausible about sending Ambassador Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate reports that Iraq was trying to buy yellow cake uranium. In fact, Ambassador Wilson was uniquely qualified for the mission. Having served as the acting Ambassador in Iraq and faced down Saddam Hussein, Ambassador Wilson also was the Director of Africa in the National Security Council and had served as an Ambassador in west Africa and monitored the uranium mining activity of the country where he was stationed.

Former Senator Thompson persists with the lie that there was no “violation” of the intelligence Identities Protection Act (IIPA). But his claim is debunked by Federal Judge Reginald Walton and Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who, after reviewing the classified personnel file of Valerie Plame Wilson, stated that she was in fact covered by the IIPA when Robert Novak printed her name in July of 2003.

It also is important to correct the record that Valerie Wilson did not suggest sending her husband to Niger. She responded to an inquiry from her supervisor and provided a memo laying out his capabilities. The decision to send Ambassador Wilson to Niger was made by a senior official in the Counter Proliferation Division of the CIA. Fred Thompson also is factually wrong by claiming that Joe Wilson returned from the trip, “and proceeded to publicly blast the administration”.

This is not true. Ambassador Wilson made no public statements critical of the Administration’s claims about the alleged purchase of yellowcake uranium until May of 2003—more than 15 months after returning from the trip and only after the President made the specious claim in the State of the Union address.

Our concern about Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney is narrower but important—are these men committed to a rule of law free of partisan influence? During the last Republican debate Rudy Giuliani said that:

he'd have to wait for the appeals process to play out to see if Libby met the criteria for a pardon. However, the former federal prosecutor said he believes the sentence imposed on Libby was "way out of line."

Mr. Giuliani had a different standard for charges of perjury and obstruction of justice on September 11, 1987:

The United States Attorney in Manhattan, Rudolph W. Giuliani, declared yesterday that the one-year prison sentence that a Queens judge received for perjury was "somewhat
shocking."

"A sentence of one year seemed to me to be very lenient," Mr. Giuliani said, when asked to comment on the sentence imposed Wednesday on Justice Francis X. Smith, the former Queens administrative judge. . . .

Justice Smith was convicted of committing perjury before a grand jury investigating corruption in the city, Mr. Giuliani said later, adding that "he could have helped root out corruption" by
cooperating with the grand jury.

Mr. Romney’s statement is more outrageous. He accused Patrick Fitzgerald of abusing "prosecutorial discretion."

The case against Mr. Libby is straightforward. He blocked the efforts of Federal agents to investigate the leak of the identity of an undercover CIA officer who was covered by the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. Mr. Libby lied to Federal law enforcement officials
investigating the leak. Most importantly, Mr. Libby was convicted in a fair trial of perjury and obstruction of justice.

This is not an issue of Republican versus Democrat. The signatories of this letter include registered Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. We believe that Republicans and Democrats alike must commit themselves to upholding the rule of law and refusing to use clandestine CIA officers as a political football. In this regard we find that the recent comments by Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney sadly wanting and unworthy of the highest elected office in the United States.

We are pleased, however, that the Republican Party is offering candidates who do believe in the rule of law. Former Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore and U.S. Congressman Ron Paul spoke boldly and reaffirmed the commitment of Republicans to uphold the rule of law. Both emphasized that the law must be applied to Mr. Libby, regardless of his social standing or wealth. We believe that Governor Gilmore and Congressman Paul reflect the values espoused by Ronald Reagan.

Good intelligence should not be a partisan issue. It is a professional obligation of intelligence officers to provide politicians with the best information and their best judgment. And it is the professional obligation of politicians to uphold the rule of law and ensure that the Constitution of the United States is upheld and enforced. On this critical issue we believe that the statements by Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney do damage to the reputation of the Republican Party and undermine public respect for the judicial system.

Respectfully yours,
Ray Close, Directorate of Operations
James Marcinkowski, Directorate of Operations
Philip Giraldi, Directorate of Operations
Michael Grimaldi, Directorate of Intelligence
Ray McGovern, Directorate of Intelligence
Melvin Goodman, Directorate of Intelligence
Larry Johnson, Directorate of Intelligence
David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Time to lock up these goons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. All Hail the signators of that letter
THE RNC IS AN ENEMY OF THE STATE. Pure. And. Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Boom. Another shoe drops.
Someone light a fire under these guys! Why are they so damned slow to respond. Finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. This administration has a closet as big as
Imelda Romuáldez Marcos closet of shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. That's a lot of shoes. 20,000 pairs, if I recall.
Oh no! We're never going to get to the last one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madhoosier Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
33. The Plame leak is one of four that fit a pattern.
The Plame/ Brewster Jennings leak is but one of four that we know about that appear to have come from the Bush administration that’s destroyed an intelligence gathering operation.

In Dec. of 2001 the Bush administration released a tape of Osama bin Laden talking with a crippled Saudi sheik about the attacks of 9/11, supposedly the release was to convince the Islamic world that bin Laden, and not Israel, were responsible for the attacks. The clandestine film of bin Laden exposed a Saudi intelligence operation that had infiltrated the highest levels of al Qaeda and was possibly the last good chance for bringing bin Laden to justice.

Ahmed Chalabi, the darling of the NeoCons who sat with Laura Bush during the 2003 State of the Union address, was told by a very high ranking government official that the NSA had broken Iran’s diplomatic code and we were reading their diplomatic cables regularly. Upon Chalabi’s return to Iraq he promptly passed the information of the intercepts to the Iranians destroying an invaluable window into the workings of Iran’s government. Beyond that, there is little doubt that every government on the planet evaluated their encryption methods when news of the intercept broke.

A month before the elections of 2004 Condoleezza Rice disclosed background information that lead to the press disclosing that Pakistan had arrested Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, a Pakistani al Qaeda agent serving as a communications link for the highest levels of al Qaeda. Pakistan had persuaded Khan into becoming a double agent. Had Khan been allowed to continue as a double agent the value of the information he could have provided can’t be underestimated, instead Khan has been disappeared into the secret prison system. The terror alert Rice was attempting to justify was based on information found on Khan’s computers that was years old. Khan has since been disappeared into the CIA’s secret prison system.

This brings us to the Plame – Brewster Jennings outing. By all accounts Brewster Jennings was a key source for gathering information on Iraq’s (pre-invasion) and Iran’s weapons of mass destruction programs.

With the exception of Libby’s conviction for lying to investigators and the Grand Jury nobody has been punished for any of these security breaches and the investigations are at dead ends.

Advancing a policy of regime change of governments that sit atop vast supplies of oil requires intelligence to justify war. The repeated “intelligence leaks” by the Bush administration seem to cripple intelligence sources that could provide accurate timely intelligence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. I can only conclude that these leaks show a deliberate intent to destroy intelligence assets
... that expose the illicit activities of corporations engaged in arms-related sales and which might offer facts that directly contradict the "faith-based" frauds employed by these necroconservatives to superficially rationalize the use of US military force to coerce sovereign powers to comply with global cororatist predations.

The notion that exposing Plame was motivated by some desire to punish Wilson is sheer nonsense, imho. I regard that as a 'cover' for a far more extensive desire to obliterate any objective source of intelligence that exposes the lies of this regime and their crony corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. This is very interesting. Thank you for this summary.
I agree that Valerie Plame's outing was about much more than revenge on her husband. It disrupted an investigation in Europe that was getting too close for comfort to bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. And on to the greatest page!
Proud to be #5!

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. it's a great letter
but because some " are missing, it's hard to read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Every news station, outlet, paper and blog should have this front and center. Very Important. Too
bad the Republicans will ignore it. National security is only important to them when it's wrapped in Republican hand-wringing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You will not see this letter anywhere in the MSM...
I would put money on it.

Ok -- Olberman would mention it...but I can't imagine anyone else talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. This letter is absolutely amazing -- K&R!
I can't wait to post this on my veterans' board -- the freepers' heads are going to explode!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Window dressing.
The CIA heart the RNC. Both heart giant corporations and globalization. All of those heart fascism.

If the CIA (remember Iran 1953) really came down on the side of Jeffersonian Democracy, *co would be over in an hour.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Betcha RNC just threw this in the trash when they saw that it called
for repudiation of Bush.

Loyalty above all else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick and recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
It's a nice letter, more bluster than actions? I guess it is a myth that the CIA take care of their own and can make life miserable for those who cross them!

It seems...I and some DU'ers are more furious about what has happened to the Wilsons versus the agency! Hope the civil action will bring some justice.
Guess I have watched too many spy movies!!:yoiks: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Repigs could care less...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Admirers of Fred Thompson take note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. As long as Fox Noise drums home the meme that Plame was not covert, the right wing won't believe it
they repeat that lie every single day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. What a letter!
Very courageous of these men. Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Respectfully yours? Thats what I do not like
about D.C.
These are the facts jack. You lied, its treason, you know it, I know it. Jail for you and all involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Fred Thompson should mind his own damn business if he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.
Either he's blatantly lying or is completely ignorant of the basic facts in the Libby case, either one disqualifies him as a credible voice on this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. Thompson's an actor but he has the same personality no matter...
what character he is playing. So how do you know when he's not acting? They operate by the premise that if they believe it ...you will too. Language is the tool of the trade so each word is contrived and fits a pattern all designed to convince you of something. Like driving his little red truck 300yrds from a rally and then jumping in his Cadillac just to convince others he's just a "good ole boy". He has some nerve talking about others lying or having a hidden agenda when he is the epitome of hypocrisy and being a phony. He just used Libby to get attention and supporters and cares little about the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. Sounds like his speech was written by someone on Cheney's staff.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Good on these guys.
That 30 percent base these repukes keep playing to will dwindle down to nothing just like Bush's popularity polls. I think the American people are really paying attention now and I say, let them stay in their lala land. I want them to become the permanent minority party for the rest of my life, and when former intelligence officers come out and forcefully rebuke the lies these Republican fools continue to tell, it will only contribute to their overwhelming loss in 2008. I've been waiting for this since early in the morning on November 8, 2000. Karma's a bitch guys, and now she wants to be paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. There are good people out there.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why do these guys hate America?
I'm series. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. It takes so much work to reverse the disinformation
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:08 PM by libodem
These GOP henchmen are bold-faced LIARS. "The most ingenious men continually pretend to condem tricking---but this is often done that they may use it themselves, when some great occasion or interest offers itself to them" Duc de la Richefoucauld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. If this is what EX-members of the CIA think
Imagine what the ACTIVE ones are thinking.

A little warning to Mittens, Giuliani and Thompson.

Don't. Piss off. The CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
26. Excellent. How can the RNC parade liars around and not correct them
Doesn't that make them complicit. Has the GOP lost all integrity? Is the whole party being run by a small group of hypocrites who blackmail the other members into submission? Or is it that "Republican" has come to be just another term for a criminal who hasn't been caught yet?

The Bush administration has turned Republicans into the party of hypocrisy and corruption. They place themselves above the rule of law and then demand pardons. They don't believe in oversight or being accountable and their candidates will not tolerate being corrected by the heads of their own party which forces all their members to be part of the cover-up. If a member speaks out against other members he must worry about retribution from the party leaders.

The lies they agree on about Libby should not be tolerated but that is the job of investigative journalists, to debunk and correct their misleading statements, except that the MSM is virtually owned by these same lie spreaders and what used to be journalists are now merely stenographers who just repeat the lies.

Thank God for the internet or we would be forced to get news about our country from other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
28. Democratic candidates need to respond to Thompson/Giuliani et al
on the Plame case. They need to more clearly state what laws were violated in the Plame matter. Lots of people don't understand that serious wrongs were committed.

Same goes for Fitzgerald. He has not made clear and simple public statements about the nature of the underlying crimes that might or would have been proved had Libby told the truth. Fitzgerald has attempted to rise above the political ramifications of this case. He needs to face them and deal with them. He was apparently able to convince the jury that what Libby did was a serious crime. But he has not even tried to convince the American public of that fact. He does not seem to realize that his reputation and maybe even his effectiveness in the future as a lawyer depend on what the public thinks about the merits of his prosecution of Libby. If future juries are persuaded by these Republicans that Fitzgerald was overzealous in this case, it could be a problem for him in a future case. I hope I'm wrong, but -- I suspect I am right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. Outstanding.
Thank you for posting this.

Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. These guys prove early on that...
They will go right on lying to us just like Bush has been lying from day one. Bush lied us into Iraq and he's lied about everything else too. I'm tired of being lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. Wow, and Fred you have no honor. Go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. Excellent letter!
I am saving this letter to my hard drive. Thank you so much for posting this!

K & R:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Looks like these guys will be wanting to spend more time with their families
for daring to stand up to the machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. The GOP are bad right to the core
I'm glad this lette was written!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. God Bless Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
and especially Ray McGovern.

kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC